E Pluribus Unum

E Pluribus UnumPeople need to remember that it is E Pluribus Unum (out of many, one), not Ex Omnibus Unum (out of all, one). There will always be some that do not become part of the one, mostly because they refuse to do so.

That’s the truth that the Liberals, Progressives, and the minorities they pander to refuse to accept. One has to become part of the one.

No, instead the Liberals, Progressives, and the minorities they pander would declaim this fact as racist, nationalist, xenophobic, and evil. This is, I think, largely because they don’t want there to be a “one” and certainly won’t tolerate it happening or anyone who wishes it to do so.

That’s the horrific thing. These oikophobic Leftists and their minority tenants may love to rant and whine about “inclusiveness” and “diversity” but they’ve willfully created an unholy synergy between these two concepts that is nothing but an attempt to dilute and dissolve America. They don’t want to make one out of many.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

The Inclusivity Myth

You here a lot about “inclusivity” from the various stripes of Liberal and Progressive elements living withing our borders. To some extent this is the Left’s professed mantra insofar as social practices are concerned.

It’s, however, nothing but a well-told lie. The inclusivity myth is false and is nothing but a rationalization of the Left’s oikophobia.

The Left does not seek inclusivity; they seek to shift societal mores to a more libertine model and espouse even less tolerance for those with normative ethical, moral, an societal practices than those that they seek to displace and destroy.

All it that the Left’s “inclusivity” really is is an attempt to exclude and marginalize people who might otherwise be included in favor of those who society has previously, rightly or wrongly, censured.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |