Democrats

Democrat Party Slogan

Posted in Humor, Politics on January 6th, 2012

It’s 2012 and in America that means a big election year. That’s a good time for a political campaign or whole party to reassess their message and how it’s distilled down into their tagline or slogan.

With the issues that the 2010 mid-term elections highlighted, this is especially true of the Democrat party. The question is what should the Democrat party slogan be changed to in order to properly reflect their agenda and fire up their constituents.

What do think? Which should be the new Democrat party slogan? All ten choices seem solid to me. They’s succinct, pithy, and they honestly distill the Democrats’ goals and should resonate strongly with their constituents.

Coyote Ugly

Posted in 2012 Election, Humor, Politics on December 20th, 2011

The Democrats have a problem. They got drunk on class warfare, ended up in bed – or up against a wall in a piss-stinking alley – with the anti-American, criminal slackers of OWS, and are now faced with the problem of a “coyote ugly” morning after.

Coyote Ugly - Gnaw arm off...
Gnaw Off Arm And Crawl Away…

Now it’s up to Americans to make sure that, come the 2012 elections, the Dems have to make that “walk of shame” right out of office and right out of history – except as a footnote on failure.

Truth be told though, I’m not sure that “shame” can play a part in this. Democrats don’t seem to have the capacity for shame and whored themselves out to OWS knowingly. Now it’s not shame that drive them; it’s morning after regrets and the fear of what diseases or vermin they may have contracted.

Liberals’ Permanent Poor

Posted in Politics, Society on November 25th, 2011

Jackass Braying It’s a very well known but seldom openly talked about fact of life and politics in America that the Liberals feed like parasites upon the poor. The Liberals need a steady herd of people – preferably largely minority – to be perceived as impoverished and to perceive themselves as impoverished in order for the Liberals to maintain some level of hold upon America’s cultural, political and economic landscape.

In a country where the single most often repeated lament about the “poor” is that they’re obese this has presented the Liberals with more than a bit of a quandary. How are the Liberals to tend their herd and farm them for votes and support as their overall situation becomes less dire? How are the Liberals going to stampede them at the forces of capitalism and individual freedom when their “poor’s” standard of living isn’t that objectively uncomfortable?

Enter Obama, or more accurately those who do the dirty work for Obama’s handlers since Obama himself is more minstrel than leader. The Obama Regime’s Census Bureau released its brand new, still technically experimental “supplemental poverty measure.”

This Supplemental Poverty Measure fundamentally changes how poverty is measured in America. It doesn’t just update the thresholds and metrics for measuring poverty, it is designed to change the basic measure of poverty from an objective standard to a relative standard.

The current poverty metrics are antiquated and do need updating, and this supplemental poverty measure has inside of it some damn good changes. It’s its philosophical base that is pernicious.

Traditionally the poverty line assumes that families need a set amount of money to meet their material needs. The Obama Regime’s new supplemental measure declares that people need at least what Americans in the 33rd percentile of expenditures already spend on “essentials.” This in turn means that, if the Liberals can coerce the government into shifting to this new wealth measuring standard, they will always have a large crop of “poor” to exploit irrespective of improvements in overall wealth.

A permanent class of poor determined to be such by relative standards is the culmination of the Liberals’ fevered wet dreams. With their boy, Obama’s help, they’re one giant step closer to achieving it.