What Form Of Treason?Posted in Politics on December 30th, 2009
On December 17, 2009 the White House released President Obama’s Executive Order 12425. With it President Obama committed what any true American would consider treason. The question remains though on what form Obama’s treason took.
Did President – for now – Obama blithely cede US sovereignty to an international body in the form of INTERPOL, or is Obama’s plan to use these international “law enforcement personnel” as foreign troops to rid himself of certain problematical American citizens and foreign visitors?
Yes, those are the only two rational reasons I can think of for why anyone claiming to be an American, much less the POTUS, would place foreign police forces above US law and the Constitution.
Can anyone come up with another reason for Obama placing foreign “police” above US law? If so, speak up! I would truly like to hear another explanation.
But this bit of treason is straight from the The White House and the mind and pen President Obama and, this time, it can’t be passed off as an ill-advised comment or misunderstanding on the part of one of his staff :
Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425
– – – – – – –
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 16, 2009.
So let us look at what restrictions President Obama has decided to remove from foreign “law enforcement” agents operating on American soil. Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the International Organizations Immunities Act of 1949 are quite innocuous and pertain only to customs duties and various forms of taxation. Section 2, however, is a totally different matter.
Section 2 – International organizations shall enjoy the status, immunities, exemptions, and privileges set forth in this section, as follows:
(c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.
So why would Obama want to make INTERPOL’s records inviolate? Why does someone installed as the President of the United States desire to make an armed foreign force’s facilities within America immune from search by American law enforcement? Why would he need them to be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act?
One reason could be that President Obama doesn’t believe in or endorse American sovereignty. Many of his speeches and espoused beliefs seem to support that hypothesis. Obama seems to want the United Nations to actually be the world’s government and have the United States to be subordinated to it.
Another possibility is that Obama is hoping to use INTERPOL to remove problematical people like: President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and various members of the US military and intelligence agencies without he and his boy, Attorney General Holder having to deal with the American laws and the US courts system.
In either case, it is treason, or at least solid grounds for such a charge, and President Obama should be dealt with like any other traitor to America – except that the penalty he and his should suffer must be the maximum one available to the American people.
Not that the Liberals ruling Congress would ever act in America’s interests in this matter and impeach Obama, remove him from office, and have him tried for treason.
No; I’m afraid the American people currently have no protection and no recourse under the law.
As for any of INTERPOL’s operatives – the only response an American should ever have to someone or something trying to enforce foreign laws upon Americans within the borders of America is an armed response.
Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. 😉