On Christmas day, 2009, a filthy bush monkey jihadi and Al-Qaeda recruit from the cesspit of Nigeria, Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab, tried to destroy a passenger jet as it came in to land at Detroit Airport. It tried to do so by detonating 80g of explosives sewn into its underpants. It failed.
The passengers and crew of Northwest flight 253, led by the brave Jasper Schuringa, captured the piece of filth after its crotch bomb failed to properly detonate and it was later turned over to the authorities upon landing.
My only issue is that it was turned over to its new zookeepers intact. While it had to be kept alive and able to respond to interrogation, it certainly didn’t need its eyes, genitals, or hands.
By Morrigu, if I had the opportunity, I would mutilate the animal – to ensure that it was safe to handle, as an object lesson for its nestmates, and to prevent it from ever again mocking humanity by looking a human in the eye, breeding more misborn crotch-droppings, or using tools.
The creature’s failed act of terrorism has raised some serious concerns about America’s and the Civilized World’s security policies. Sadly, members of my own titular political party, the GOP, have focused on the wrong issue. They’re complaining that the vermin was allowed to board flight 253 since it was on the Terror Watch List and its father – or at least the male that its mother claimed rutted it into her – had reported its jihadi tendencies to American authorities.
This is completely the wrong question and the wrong complaint. It reeks of both hyperpartisanship and seeking the easy, politically safe answer to the problem facing America and the Civilized World.
It’s easy to end up one the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) watch list. There are over 500K individuals on that list for a variety of reasons of varying degrees of merit. That is why the TIDE watch list is not the same thing as the “No Fly” list.
There are less than 4,000 of the names on the “No Fly” list and only another 14,000 names are on the “Selectee” list, which calls for mandatory secondary screening.
There just wasn’t enough evidence to place the diseased bush monkey, Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab on the “No Fly” or “Selectee” lists.
There was not enough negative information to include his name in a subset of that group, the Terrorist Screening Data Base (TSDB) that has more than 400,000 individuals and is the main identities database within the U.S. government for international terrorism, the official said.
Less than 4,000 of the names in the TSDB are on the “No Fly” list and another 14,000 names are on the “Selectee” list, which calls for mandatory secondary screening, the official said.
“There was insufficient derogatory information available on the subject at that time to include him in the TSDB or its ‘no fly’ or ‘selectee’ lists,” the official said. “Thus, he was not watchlisted as of 25 December 2009.
That is likely how it should be, despite the risks entailed. America and the Civilized World shouldn’t be concentrating on keeping the 500K+ individuals on the TIDE list from flying on airlines. Such a concern is – very obviously in the wake of recent jihadi attacks and near misses by Muslim terrorists – ineffectual.
No; the Civilized World, and especially America, needs to focus on the problem. That problem is the fact that this creature managed to board an airline with approximately 80g of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) in his underwear and a syringe filled with the needed catalyst.
Since Al-Qaeda has used it before, I would guess that the catalyst was triacetone triperoxide (TATP). TATP is, as explosives go, easy enough to make that even a Muslim cur can hope to do so safely.
Both the failed “Shoe Bomber” and the vermin who downed Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland used PETN / TATP binary explosives. The combination of PETN and TATP is the new cocktail favorite among Muslim terrorists .
We need to get over it and stop kowtowing to the puling Liberals, their jabbering minority sharecroppers, and their terrorist allies, CAIR. There is no reason for our criminally lax and misapplied transit security measures other than the stupidity of political correctness.
America and the Civilized world is not dealing with a criminal problem stemming from Islam and the Muslims; it’s engaged in a war, a war the Muslim animals have couched in what passes for their religious terms – Jihad.
We peoples of the Earth may not have started the war or wished for it to happen in the first place. We’re, however, stuck with it and, if we hope to finish it and provide a free and secure future for our children, we must accept that the war exists and treat all situations pertaining to it in a fitting manner.
Some Simple, Pragmatic Security Measures:
Firstly and fundamentally, we need to curtail or severely limit the issuance of travel and work visas to individuals from dangerous nations. That would include the entirety of the Middle-East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia Minor along with parts of other regions.
We didn’t allow free and largely unregulated travel from Germany and Japan during WW2, nor did we allow such from the USSR during the Cold War. This war is little or no different from those at the functional security level.
Secondly and more pragmatically, we need to focus our transit security measures on Muslims. Individuals from Muslim nations, individual with Muslim names, and individuals whose appearance is of Muslim nature. Yes, we need to profile these individuals and focus our efforts upon them – the problem and the threat – rather than artificially diluting our security efforts for the sake of Liberal sensitivities.
That means automatic security screening of Muslims at all transit nexuses, especially ingress and egress points into civilized nations. It means presentation of IDs and visual verification their identities, i.e., the required removal of the hijab in the case of their females. It means automatic physical searches of Muslims attempting to utilize transit nexuses and that these physical searches incorporate: pat downs, partial strip searches of Muslims in particularly concealing raiment, and the routine use of metal detectors, chemical sensors, and bomb dogs on Muslim travelers.
I’m not utterly insensitive to Muslim body taboos. Searches that interfere with their prejudices should be done in private and by the appropriately gendered security personnel.
Face it, law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and the military profile individuals all the time in the course of executing their duties. Indeed, the “profile” of a serial killer was publish separately by both Dr. Jack A. Apsche and Dr. Eric W. Hickey in the 1990’s and nobody complained.
The Liberals did not complain about this racial and gender profiling because the profile of a serial killer is a White male in his 20s to 30s who is quiet and tends to keep to himself. In the minds of the Liberals and their jabbering minority sharecroppers it’s only wrong and politically incorrect if the ones being profiled aren’t Whites.
All the questions about why this thing, Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab, was allowed to fly on an airline to a civilized nation with impunity are moot and misguided. The real question was why any Muslim or resident of a heavily or primarily Muslim nation was allowed to do so without appropriate security screening.
This is a war, a jihad being waged by Muslim filth against the Civilized World by means of terrorism. The absolutely necessary constraints placed upon law enforcement measures do not apply and must not be misapplied in this matter.
Indeed, despite the expected rantings from the Leftists and the ever-eager-to-rage minorities, no true Color of Law is even being applied in the course of the security measures that I propose be enacted. There is no valid reason to rail about, “innocent until proven guilty” because there is no de facto application of criminal charges.
In point of fact, no civilian charges need to be brought at all. This is a war and, as such, the enemy should be treated as a enemy combatant who eschewed the wearing of a uniform or distinctive badge and deliberately attacked purely civilian targets…
One cannot rationally complain about, “unlawful search and seizure” unless one is willing to claim that all transit security measures are unconstitutional, illegal, and wrong. That’s something that no sane person – or even most Liberals – would do.
The only complaint that can be put forth against properly profiling Muslims who attempt to travel to or within the Civilized World is that it is “profiling” and, except when applied to Whites, violates the tenets of political correctness.
I, for one, am utterly unwilling to entertain for even one bare moment the idea that maintaining political correctness is a valid reason for putting women and children at increased risk from Muslim terrorism. The Liberals seem to sanguine about a second 9/11 but I and the American population are far less so.
Focus on the problem and deal with it in a manner that provides the greatest chance of permanently eliminating the threat of Muslim terrorism!