No Power, No Civility

No Power, No Civility
No Power No Civility

Yep, Ole Hillary crawled back out whatever dank hole she nests in between ill-thought screeds and proclaimed that, “[If the Dems]…are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again.” This, coming at a time when Republicans being shot, stabbed, doxxed, beaten, mailed ricin, run out of restaurants, and they and their families sent rape and death threats, has most Americans rightly outraged and concerned with her and other prominent Leftists’ calls for insurrection, violence and mob rule.

Rather than focus on the violence – with 70 million American patriots under arms, we can be deal with the Dems’ threat and in the process cull their voting base enough to geld them as political force – I think we should, instead, focus more on Hillary’s promise of “civility” if we allow them to regain any real power.  This is because their sort’s definition and enforcement of “civility” is a far worse and more lasting danger than any violence they will perpetrate.

Americans need only look to the Dem’s constituencies to see and understand what “civility” means under their rule.  The concerted banning of American voices on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube clearly show us what type “civility” their sort will demand.  Or we, the People can merely look to what their Fake News industry chooses to report and how they choose to editorialize that reporting. Or one can simply look to what is happening almost daily in the failing, degenerate remains of America’s colleges and universities.

“Civility,” when demanded and enforced by Democrats is always nothing less- or other than the censorship via law or extra-judicial measures of anyone whose opinion is apologetically different from their orthodoxy – an orthodoxy predicated upon the dogma of Political Correctness which is, in turn, predicated upon the narrative of “Social Justice.

And that, Ladies and Gentlemen of America, is what we must fight against, be in via the ballot box, in the streets, or from the rooftops. It isn’t even about Making America Great Again; it’s about keeping America alive and recognizable as the nation she was born to be.

Related Reading:

2018 America's Wave Election: The 70%'s Change Agenda
Treating People Well: The Extraordinary Power of Civility at Work and in Life
The Field of Blood: Violence in Congress and the Road to Civil War
Reasons To Vote For Democrats: A Comprehensive Guide
Campaigns and Elections (Third Edition, 2018 Election Update)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

The Boy Scouts

Scouts
The Boy Scouts Of^In America

So..The Boy Scouts are “removing” boys in favor of being gender neutral. They’re now calling themselves Scouts BSA and are allowing girls entrance and membership. Many Americans are worried about the Scouts making other fundamental changes.

A New Scout Oath?

On my honor I will do my best to be politically correct, to establish safe spaces, to fill all gender-diversity quotas, and to check my toxic micro-aggressive make privilege, so help me Whatever.

Well, The Old One Was “Offensive”

On my honor I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.

Yeah, let’s me see. The actual Scout Oath invokes God, Country, references Morality, and uses the word “Straight.” So…Christofascist, Nationalist, Intolerant, and a dog-whistle / trigger for Homophobic.

Honestly, given how many changes in core organizations of America have been forced through political correctness and other expressions of oikophobia, misandry, and anti-White racism, I can understand the concern. I just think it’s misplaced this time.

Boy Scouts Then and Now

BSA’s Venturing, Sea Scouting, and Exploring programs – all for the problematical ages of 14-20 – have been coed for some time with no newsworthy issues. Venturing and Exploring have been coed since 1971.

Also, Cub Scout “dens” will be single-gender, with separate groups for boys and girls, allowing the organization “to maintain the integrity of the single-gender model while also meeting the needs of today’s families.” Or, as like to put it, to minimize the exposure to- and exchange of “cooties.” 😉

I just can’t see where the addition of the Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts will suddenly cause an issue for the BSA or for concerned Americans. Sure, they could suddenly go all PC but, as they haven’t really bowed to most of that so far, I’m not worried about it much at all.

No, the only ones who are having and going to have more of a problem with the Boy Scouts going coed is the Girl Scouts. They’re already incensed because they’re staunch advocates of single-gender scouting, believing that only in a male-less organization can girls be safe and thrive.

Girl Scouts is the best girl leadership organization in the world, created with and for girls. We believe strongly in the importance of the all-girl, girl-led, and girl-friendly environment that Girl Scouts provides, which creates a free space for girls to learn and thrive.

The benefit of the single-gender environment has been well-documented by educators, scholars, other girl- and youth-serving organizations, and Girl Scouts and their families. Girl Scouts offers a one-of-a-kind experience for girls with a program tailored specifically to their unique developmental needs.

GSBlog

So, the Girl Scout are still a She-Woman Man Haters Club, to riff on a staple of Our Gang, with boys not being allowed to join – except for case-by-case exceptions for full lifestyle T-Girls, and men only allowed in troop leadership positions with heavy restrictions, e.g., never being allowed to be in the presence of the troop’s girls with at least one non-related woman present at all times. So, just the all-to-normal anti-male prejudices and double standards once again at play in society.

And, of course, there are no great, or even noticeable, numbers of people who want the Girl Scouts to change the sexually exclusive policies…though many wanted the Boy Scouts to change theirs. Yet, I don’t believe this is political correctness winning over Boy Scouts’ traditions or anti-male ideology trumping fairness in the case of the Girl Scouts.

Pragmatism Over Ideology

Simply put, I firmly believe that both the Boy Scouts’ choosing to allow girls to join the Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts, and the Girl Scouts’ anger and strident vitriol over it are primarily rooted is pure pragmatism and the organizations’ respective existential realities.

Scouting, much like youth sports, is in sharp decline. The Boys Scouts are down to about 2.3 million scouts from a peak of more than 4 million, and the Girl Scouts have dwindled to 1.8 million members from a high of 3.8 million. So, in my opinion, this is just the Boy Scouts taking a deliberate step to increase its odds of surviving into the next generation.

Similarly, the Girl Scouts’ complaints, while couched in the terms of special privileges, special “needs,” and misandry, are more than likely fueled by the fear of their organizations’ demise due to no longer seeming to have a monopoly on girls’ scouting.

Related Reading:

Scout's Outdoor Cookbook (Falcon Guide)
Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture
On Competition (Harvard Business Review Book)
Retaking America: Crushing Political Correctness
The America's Test Kitchen Cooking School Cookbook: Everything You Need to Know to Become a Great Cook

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

The Highlights Of 2017

The Highlights Of 2017

2017 was a very interesting year, a true watershed in the history of the world, the West, and America. What makes it even odder to me that the one thing that sums up the highlights of 2017 actually took place in 2016, specifically on November 8th.

Yes! This video, though from 2016, sums up the foundation of what was 2017. It was, with the amazing and largely unexpected election of Donald Trump to the US Presidency, a year of America rebirth. Of course, like all births, it was accompanied by blood, sweat, and tears. In this case, the blood, sweat and bitter tears of Liberal and Progressives of all flavors as the weeped and gnashed their teeth over a birth that they unsurprisingly so wanted to abort. 😉

Yes, 2017 was the best of years…for we, the People; it was the worst of years for those others living within the borders of our once and future great nation.

Related Reading:

Feminists Don't Wear Pink and Other Lies: Amazing Women on What the F-Word Means to Them
Turd Burglar (Nasty Scat Action!)
Water Quality: Management of a Natural Resource
Political Correctness Gone Mad?
The FBI War on Tupac Shakur and Black Leaders: U.S. Intelligence's Murderous Targeting of Tupac, MLK, Malcolm, Panthers, Hendrix, Marley, Rappers and Linked Ethnic Leftists

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |