What’s In A Name?

What's In A Name? Apparently, a lot to some of the more sensitized sort
What’s In A Name?

Yes! This sums up the monumental hypocrisy of America’s domestic enemies, the Liberal, Progressives, and those sorts that they pander to- and enable. They behave in such a manner that it became reasonable for ESPN to change who was providing play-by-play commentating for a college football game because his name was Robert Lee. Yet, for eight years they decried any American who didn’t like the POTUS’ middle name being Hussein as a bigot, racist, and Islamophobe.

Related Reading:

Snowflakes in Photographs (Dover Pictorial Archive)
The Bait of Satan, 20th Anniversary Edition: Living Free from the Deadly Trap of Offense
Managing the Millennials: Discover the Core Competencies for Managing Today's Workforce
Resentment and the “Feminine” in Nietzsche’s Politico-Aesthetics
The Hypocrisy of Disco: A Memoir

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Regretfully Correct

Regretfully Correct Liberal
A Regretfully Correct Libtard

Yeah, while few, if any, of the Civilized World’s various domestic enemies would be so sanguine about their own execution at the hands of the jihadis, this does aptly sum up their dhimmitude, oikophobia, and slavish devotion to political correctness.

Then again, stupid should be painful, so this wouldn’t be an absolute horror show or without benefit in the larger context. And yes! Let me make this clear to one and all – if it were just Liberals and Progressives at risk of being murdered by Muslim terrorists, I wouldn’t be bothered by it at all.

Related Reading:

Jihad: The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia
Understanding Dhimmitude
The Sarcasm Handbook
Progressive Sight Reading Exercises: Piano Technique
The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

The Deplorables

They're The DeplorablesHillary Clinton, while speaking a select group of wealthy queers in New York City last Friday, said that fully 50% of Donald Trump’s supporters were racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, and/or islamaphobic. She bluntly and openly described them – a very conservatively estimated 22 million American voters – as a basket of deplorables i.e. as deserving of strong condemnation due to shock, fear, or disgust they engender.

Rather than choose to be offended by Hillary’s declaration, I decided to think about what she said objectively and to take into account the greater context of Hillary’s words, audience, and cultural history. Doing so has allowed me to realize that this is just another case where the Left confuses facts and truth.

The simple and sad fact is that, within the context of how Liberals, Progressives, and those who they enable and pander to have mis-defined various form of bigotry and expanded what they consider examples thereof, we are racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, and/or islamaphobic. Indeed, given their beliefs, it’s not just 50% of Donald Trump’s supporters who are so deplorable; it’s entirety of the White population of America who is so …or at least so their oikophobic ideology forces them to believe. Their only internal conflict is when an individual with one “protected trait” is perceived by them to have attacked another with a different “protected trait.” Then, suffer from hysterical paralysis until they can determine the hierarchy of victimology.

So what is truly deplorable and abhorrent to Americans is not what Hillary said. It is what her followers truly believe and that is deplorable indeed.

Related Reading:

REVEL for Living Democracy, 2016 Presidential Election -- Access Card (5th Edition)
The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society
America: The Last Best Hope (Volume I): From the Age of Discovery to a World at War
Racism: A Very Short Introduction
Demonizing the Other: Antisemitism, Racism and Xenophobia (Studies in Antisemitism)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |