The DNC’s Donna

As most are probably aware, the MSM being what it is in this age, Debbie Wasserman Shultz has resigned from her position as the head of the Democratic National Committee in the wake of Wikileaks release of 19,252 hacked DNC emails, some of which showed that the DNC under Wasserman Shultz was actively aiding Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders throughout the Democrats’ primary race. She’s to be replaced by Donna Brazile.

Debbie Wasserman Shultz
The New Head Of Hillary’s “50-State” Campaign

No worries for Debbie though. Hillary immediately made an “honest woman” of her by naming her the new head of the Clinton campaign’s 50 States Program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country and continue to be Hillary’s surrogate.

There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie–which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states.

— Hillary Clinton

So Debbie’s out of the DNC and out of the closet, as were, and Donna Brazile, Debbie’s second in command, is now in charge of the DNC until at least after the convention. Most likely she’ll continue on as the DNC’s Chairwoman until the 2016 elections are over. After all, she brings so much that so important to the Dems’ struggle.

We're not going to let the White boys winDonna Brazile – We’re Not Going To Let The White Boys Win

It should be a smooth transition of power too. Donna was acting alongside the Clintons against the Sanders’ campaign right along with Wasserman Shultz. Hence, this change is the pro forma, surface-only change – ironically with a Jew as the scapegoat – that one has to expect from the Democrat political establishment.

Related Reading:

America
What America's Decline in Economic Freedom Means for Entrepreneurship and Prosperity
Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton
Changing the Rules of Engagement: Inspiring Stories of Courage and Leadership from Women in the Military
Conklin's Corruption (#3 Conklin's Contemporary Romance Trilogy) (Conklin's Trilogy)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

White House Vandalism

White House VandalWhite House Vandalism

True, insofar as we’ve been allowed to know, there’s no indication that Barack Obama has “tagged” the White House in any way. The closest we have is his and Moochele’s darkening of it public artwork, something that they have every right to do even though it flies in the face of established tradition.

Yet, at the same time, his constant hateful, race-baiting and pro Black Insurrectionist rhetoric has done much to paint the White House in a manner that might as well be called vandalism. Never has anyone filling the role of POTUS injected their own hate and envy filled views into so many situations, both large and small. No resident of the White House has so fouled its hallowed halls.

Related Reading:

Richard Scarry's A Day at the Police Station (Look-Look)
Michelle Obama: A Life
400 Things Cops Know: Street-Smart Lessons from a Veteran Patrolman
Foreign Éclairs (A White House Chef Mystery)
The Official Dictionary of Sarcasm Postcards: 45 Cards for Those of Us Who Are Better and Smarter Than the Rest of You

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |

You Will Rent The Apt

If Americans though it was horrific that your business and life could be destroyed for not baking a cake or not printing a tee-shirt that one found offensive was bad, they really need to see where this sort of thing is going and what the Obama Regime is doing.

Forget cakes and tee-shirts for queers. The Obama Regime is demanding that landlords rent the apartment to criminals if those criminals are non-White, especially Black.

Across the United States, African Americans and Hispanics are arrested, convicted and incarcerated at rates disproportionate to their share of the general population. Consequently, criminal records-based barriers to housing are likely to have a disproportionate impact on minority home seekers. While having a criminal record is not a protected characteristic under the Fair Housing Act, criminal history-based restrictions on housing opportunities violate the Act if, without justification, their burden falls more often on renters or other housing market participants of one race or national origin over another (i.e., discriminatory effects liability).

~*~

A housing provider violates the Fair Housing Act when the provider’s policy or practice has an unjustified discriminatory effect, even when the provider had no intent to discriminate. Under this standard, a facially – neutral policy or practice that has a discriminatory effect violates the Act if it is not supported by a legally sufficient justification. Thus, where a policy or practice that restricts access to housing on the basis of criminal history has a disparate impact on individuals of a particular race, national origin, or other protected class, such policy or practice is unlawful under the Fair Housing Act if it is not necessary to serve a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest of the housing provider, or if such interest could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.

Office of General Counsel, HUD

And of course, if the non-White criminal files a discrimination complaint, the landlord or “property provider” is the one who must shoulder the burden and expense of proving that they had a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest in not renting property the non-White criminal, that such interest was neither hypothetical nor speculative, that not renting the property to the non-White criminal in question would achieve that interest, and that not renting the property to the non-White criminal was the only way to achieve that interest.

Yes, in this case as it is in every single case involving “disparate impact,” “discriminatory effect,” and “protected classes” there is a presumption of guilt upon the presumably White defendant – guilty until proven innocent. This is because the accused, if White, is considered guilty not due to his or her actions and motives but because the complainant is non-White and the effect upon the complainant is negative.

To further degrade any hope for true, unbiased justice in these matters, consider the qualifications needed for the landlord’s interests – substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory, and neither hypothetical nor speculative. All of these are completely and utterly subjective. These are metrics decided upon solely so that the government is the final arbiter of what any case’s results will be.

Cracka, you will rent the apartment to that Black or Hispanic thug or you will be destroyed.

Related Reading:

Law For Dummies
The Book on Managing Rental Properties: A Proven System for Finding, Screening, and Managing Tenants with Fewer Headaches and Maximum Profits
Horseman, Pass By (Hud)
The Everything American Government Book: From the Constitution to Present-Day Elections, All You Need to Understand Our Democratic System
Protected Class Status for Veterans in College

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |