Government of the self was the original basis for republican government, reflecting the view that civil society was much more than politics. Society was made up of men and women who gave order to their lives by entering into associations on a voluntary basis, quite apart from government, for all the various reasons of fellowship, philanthropy, faith and commerce.
There’s a plethora a roads that lead to beauty and beautiful faces come in many shades. No one is any better or worse than any other, though each of us will likely have our preferences – though I’m one of the exceptions this, not having any generalized, ethnic or racial preferences when it comes to women’s beauty.
Light Girls’ Beautiful Faces
Of course, society being what it is, not all beautiful faces are treated equally. This is especially true for light-skinned Black women. They catch a lot of Hell from their darker-toned sisters…for no other reason than being a lighter shade of brown.
Don’t get me wrong; I’ve my own issues with society’s general conception of Black beauty. It’s just that the prejudice, bigotry, and general vileness of the “Black Community’s” response to light-skinned Black women – especially if they have “good hair” and/or light eys – is extremely despicable, vulgar, and abhorrent to me.
To those angry Blacks and the various Liberal angst appropriators who believe that I, a White man – a “Cracka” to boot, should never comment on internecine Black issues: Suck it up, Buttercup!
I live in “The Hood” and one of my wives is Black. I have to hear about and, to some extent, deal with this shit every day so I’ll comment as I damn well please.
The shadism or colorism that the “Black Community” inflicts upon itself is as ridiculous as it is pernicious, which is to be expected since it’s nothing but racism being applied to their own people.
One of the primary reasons I tell people not to bother verbally arguing with the gun-grabbers is that Americans and the Liberals and Progressives can’t truly effectively communicate with each other on this issue. What an American says and means is distorted into something else by the cultural bias of the Liberals and Progressives. What we say is not closely related at all to what they hear.
Despite the cynical manipulation of the various “weathertainment” channels and the over the top overreaction by Bill de Blasio, NYC’s cop killer mayor, The Blizzard That Wasn’t of 2015 didn’t do much more than give us a chance to enjoy a snow day.
It’s a fact that Ann Coulter, the “shock jock” of sociopolitical thought and commentary, essentially makes her rent by utterly kissing off Liberals, Progressives, and their various and sundry sharecropping minority tenants by speaking truth in the most inflammatory manner. The important thing to remember, however, is that much of what Coulter says is the truth even if it is delivered in the most polarizing manner possible.
A perfect example of this is her pithy commentary upon “immigration reform” in the US:
If this sort of drastic change were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning the fact that current immigration law is intentionally designed to reduce their percentage in the population.
Liberals, Progressives, and the non-Whites they farm for votes have always behaved as if reducing Whites to a minority in America was the goal of immigration, though the Blacks’ glee over it amuses me. The “Browning of America” is seen by them to be a good and worthy goal in and of itself or so their rhetoric makes it seem.
If this same attitude and rhetoric was applied to any other, non-White demographic is would be decried as cultural genocide. Indeed, various activist and “civil rights” groups would be in the courts filing lawsuit after lawsuit against it…and rioting and looting in “protest” against it and those that espoused it.
So Ann Coulter spoke the truth. “Immigration reform” is an attempt by the Left at legalized genocide of White culture in America.
Joseph Story, who served on the Supreme Court of the United States from 1811 to 1845, is best known outside of legal circle for his magisterial treatise of US Constitution, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, which was first published in 1833 and, to this day, is considered one of seminal publications on the highest and most fundamental sets of American law and jurisprudence.
In all truth, Justice Story’s various writings but most especially his Commentaries, should be required reading in schools. Sadly however, I have never even heard about it being on an optional reading list.
Then this oversight might be explained by Story’s own words in Book II (2nd edition and later) of his Commentaries:
If these Commentaries shall but inspire in the rising generation a more ardent love of their country, an unquenchable thirst for liberty, and a profound reverence for the constitution and the union, then they will have accomplished all that their author ought to desire. Let the American youth never forget that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings, and blood of their ancestors; and capable, if wisely improved, and faithfully guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the substantial blessings of life, the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, property, religion, and independence. The structure has been erected by architects of consummate skill and fidelity; its foundations are solid; its compartments are beautiful as well as useful; its arrangements are full of wisdom and order; and its defenses are impregnable from without. It has been reared for immortality, if the work of man may justly aspire to such a title. It may, nevertheless, perish in an hour by the folly, or corruption, or negligence of its only keepers, THE PEOPLE. Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people in order to betray them.
If the Commentaries accomplished all that their author ought to desire, America would never have reached a point when and where what passes for our educational system did not include the work in the curriculum. Now, our nation having reached the point when and where it is only the profligate who are rewarded, Justice Story’s work is antithetical to ideology that the school system wants to inculcate in the rising generation.
After all, since the 1960s the schools system has been more and more striving to teach the American youth to forget that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings, and blood of their ancestors. Indeed, quite the opposite is taught now in what passes for our public schools.
And therein is meat of the problem. America’s domestic enemies know and capitalize upon the fact that America has been reared for immortality, but that it may perish in an hour by the folly, or corruption, or negligence of its only keepers, the People.