Reflections From a Murky Pond

As it’s almost time for another election in America and as we’ve someone who’s both a Democrat and a Black controlling the DoJ, let’s review the fact that not all ID requests are considered equal.

Yes, it’s true. The appropriateness and political correctness of states requiring government issued photo ID in order for a citizen or resident to purchase something or perform some action is ONLY considered racist by America’s domestic enemies when it involves voting and then only when that voting involves minorities, most specifically voting by the Blacks.

Apparently the Blacks seem to have some problem with acquiring a photo ID, something that the vast majority of Americans have no problem doing. Hence, insofar as they and their Liberal and Progressive enablers – and, of course, the Democrat party’s vote farmers – are concerned such things are racist solely because the Blacks seem to have some problem with meeting this simple requirement.

Of course, as is sadly normal for these sorts, our domestic enemies are far more laser focused on a specific result that favors themselves than in making America better. Consider that, if they focused upon getting the Blacks to meet the basic requirement of having a government issued photo ID, not only would voting requirements not be an issue but the Blacks would actually not be so disadvantaged in most facets of life by not having one in the first place.

What Would Jesus Do?

The trite question, “What would Jesus do,” is a lot like the Christian conceit of imprecatory prayer; it’s more annoying than anything else. Given the general uselessness and cowardice of those who tend to ask WWJD, I would like to remind them that it might include turning over tables and breaking out whips.

Even as a Pagan it’s disheartening to know that the only ones that ever bring up the possibility of such wrath are the ever-covetous failures in America and then they focus solely on the targets being bankers, other financial types, and the wealthy, forgetting that Jesus beat the crap out them for profaning the temple, not for being wealthy.

Our Last Chance To Defend The SCOTUS

If any American still needs a compelling reason to vote for Trump in the upcoming 2016 elections, this is it. If Hillary is elected, the makeup of the SCOTUS will be irrevocably changed and those Liberal “justices” will fundamentally transform America through judicial activism.

As is the case with almost all the Bikini Interlude posts, there’s really no real purpose to this post beyond providing myself and any who come here a brief interlude of beauty as exemplified by babes in bikinis.

In previous years this would have been a somewhat belated end of season edition but, with the southern beaches in America still being quite warm and the global reach of Reflections From A Murky Pond, I’ve realized that it’s always bikini season somewhere. 😉

Madonna For Hillary – The Oldest PAC

On Tuesday, 18 October 2016, aging pop star Madonna raised some eyebrows by offering to give blow jobs to voters who cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton.

If you vote for Hillary Clinton, I will give you a blow job. OK? I’m really good. I’m not a douche and I’m not a tool. I take my time, I have a lot of eye contact and I do swallow.

— Madonna

OK, leaving aside the fact that any mention of oral sex and the Clintons is “matrimonially insensitive,” this begs the question of since when did prostitution become the manner in which women promoted other women in society, business, and/or politics?

Given that prostitution is rightfully called the oldest profession, I’d hazard the guess that it’s been the manner such things were done since we invented society, business, and politics. Think of it as the oldest PAC. 😛

Of course, the utter lack of outrage among the Feminists shows their hypocrisy in the matter. Given that even “Sex Positive” Feminists – is that an oxymoron or a unicorn? – are against blow jobs and stridently against swallowing, the lack of outrage on their part shows the world that they don’t have a moral position, only a political one.

And…There’s that pesky, little matter of US Federal law. Madonna’s offer to fellate men who vote for Hillary may run afoul of the penumbra of 18 U.S. Code § 597. I’m force to say “may” because that statute requires an expenditure and one could easily argue that Madonna would be spending nothing to suck off these men. Indeed! One could argue that it’s the men who would be “spending.” 😆 Also, as prostitute isn’t legal in America, there may be an odd loophole where an illegal expenditure can’t be legally classed as an expenditure for purposes of the law.

NOTE: Just enjoy or hate the sarcasm. I’m very well aware that Madonna said this as part of her intro for comedienne Amy Schumer at her recent Madison Square Gardens performance. As such, this was all in good, “clean” fun. Hell! If it wasn’t, old Slick Willy would already be line up. 😛