It is self-evident that no number of men, by conspiring, and calling themselves a government, can acquire any rights whatever over other men, or other men’s property, which they had not before, as individuals. And whenever any number of men, calling themselves a government, do anything to another man, or to his property, which they had no right to do as individuals, they thereby declare themselves trespassers, robbers, or murderers, according to the nature of their acts.
To all my fellow Americans – I wish you a happy Thanksgiving. To the Liberals and Progressives – I leave you with the quandary of whether or not you can bring yourself to bitch about a Black immigrant dressed as an “Indian Princess.” 😛
Reality is more than little rough right now and looking like it’s going to get rougher before it gets better, if it even will get better. Sounds like a good time to take a short, restorative break from it.
VTOL Jet Turbine Snail!
There we all go. Nothing’s a better break from reality than a transforming VTOL snail with jet turbines. Enjoy! 😆
Liberals and Progressives are wont to gush of Obama’s analytical abilities…
Obama Analyzes America
Of course they do! Obama’s analysis of Americans is always the same and fits perfectly with the oikophobic Liberals and Progressives’ dogma. The boy doesn’t seem capable of seeing dissent as anything other than a sign of America’s “systemic racism.”
This begs the question though. Is Obama just another cynical, race-baiting grifter trading on identity politics to get his way or does the boy actually believe what he says?
It seems an important question to me. If Obama is the former, that’s one thing and a thing that can be dealt with. If, however, Obama – affluent, highly educated, and White raised – really can’t see anything except through the lens of race, that’s strong evidence to support the theory that America should not and must not ever again elect a Black to high office.
Faisal Saeed Al Mutar’s Facebook post about a fictional conversation between a Jihadi and a Progressive is said to have gone viral:
It must be incredibly frustrating as an Islamic terrorist not to have your views and motives taken seriously by the societies you terrorize, even after you have explicitly and repeatedly stated them. Even worse, those on the regressive left, in their endless capacity for masochism and self-loathing, have attempted to shift blame inwardly on themselves, denying the terrorists even the satisfaction of claiming responsibility.
It’s like a bad Monty Python sketch:
“We did this because our holy texts exhort us to to do it.”
“No you didn’t.”
“Wait, what? Yes we did…”
“No, this has nothing to do with religion. You guys are just using religion as a front for social and geopolitical reasons.”
“WHAT!? Did you even read our official statement? We give explicit Quranic justification. This is jihad, a holy crusade against pagans, blasphemers, and disbelievers.”
“No, this is definitely not a Muslim thing. You guys are not true Muslims, and you defame a great religion by saying so.”
“Huh!? Who are you to tell us we’re not true Muslims!? Islam is literally at the core of everything we do, and we have implemented the truest most literal and honest interpretation of its founding texts. It is our very reason for being.”
“Nope. We created you. We installed a social and economic system that alienates and disenfranchises you, and that’s why you did this. We’re sorry.”
“What? Why are you apologizing? We just slaughtered you mercilessly in the streets. We targeted unwitting civilians – disenfranchisement doesn’t even enter into it!”
“Listen, it’s our fault. We don’t blame you for feeling unwelcome and lashing out.”
“Seriously, stop taking credit for this! We worked really hard to pull this off, and we’re not going to let you take it away from us.”
“No, we nourished your extremism. We accept full blame.”
“OMG, how many people do we have to kill around here to finally get our message across?”
Of course, as we all know, if this conversation were conducted in person there’s only one way it could end.
Allahu Akbar Metnakah!
This would never happen though. Liberals and Progressives love telling us these things but I can’t really see them saying the same thing to the jihadis that they’re seemingly always engaged in apologetics for. This is probably a good thing because it would raise too many difficult questions – e.g., is it still terrorism if a Jihadi kills a Liberal or Progressive?
Also, let me point out that both the widow and the orphan shown above are Palestinians, parts of Hamas in the West Back. In other words, they’re both “good” Muslim terrorists and hold a special place in the hearts of Liberals and Progressives. Now picture what ISIS will do and how far they’ll go for their false God.
Does the above that I or any American believe that all, or even a majority, of those Muslim widows and orphans will turn out to be terrorist jihadi? No! Statistics from both government and NGO sources say that, if we let 10,000 of them into America, only 2000 will be supportive of Muslim Terrorism, and only 200 will actually “radicalize” and commit terrorist acts in the names of Allah and his Pedophile Prophet.
Of course, much like serial killers, we can’t tell which ones of those widows and orphans are a danger by looking at them…