Reflections From a Murky Pond

One of the best things about the failure of the labor unions is that they’re engaging in collective cannibalism. They’re eating their own and predating upon each other, which bodes well for America’s future. This is good because anything that weakens these syndicates further and contributes to their eventual destruction is a good thing for the American economy and should be celebrated by the American people.

With American workers fleeing the unions in droves, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters has chosen to raid other unions for members. Currently, their trying to pouch the US Airways and American Airlines mehanics from their existing unions. This is causing a lot of anger in the unions the Teamsters have targeted as prey.

As a trade unionist, I’m outraged and disgusted that the Teamsters plan to waste the time and resources of their members in an unprincipled raid against union members at US Airways. Let’s call this what it is: The IBT is behaving like a parasite. They are desperately attempting to feed off another organization to cover up their own failures. This has everything to do with the Bureau of Labor Statistics reporting that the IBT lost more members than any other union last year and nothing to do with the needs of aircraft mechanics.

– Garry Drummond
Air Transport Division Director, TWU

To be heartlessly fair though, nobody – not even the filth who run the labor soviets – should be surprised by this behavior. The Teamsters have a long and infamous history or predatory practices. Throughout the decades of their unfortunate existence they’re raided and sought to destroy union after union. That’s part of why they finally left AFL-CIO which tried to curtail that sort of behavior.

For Americans though, this is good news. Whenever the unions feast upon each other instead of the productive American population its a good thing.

Related Reading:

It seems that the Boston area still has a lingering problem caused by Tsarnaev brothers’ terrorist attack. They don’t seem to know what to do with remains of the vermin, Tamerlan Tsarnaev because no cemetery will accept the subhuman filth’s corpse.

A Worcester funeral home director is pleading for government officials to use their influence to convince a cemetery to bury Boston bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, but so far no state or federal authorities have stepped forward to help out.

“We have a body for burial that has caused a lot of controversy and we can’t continue to play this game,” said Peter Stefan, owner of the Graham, Putnam and Mahoney Funeral Parlors. “Under normal circumstances, the government would say it’s (the funeral parlor’s) responsibility to find a place for burial, but this is not normal circumstances. This is a nightmare.”

Since Stefan accepted Tsarnaev’s body Friday, protesters have been outside the funeral home, under the wary eye of local police, demanding that the bomber’s body be shipped out of the United States. Meanwhile, Stefan told the Herald the family wants Tsarnaev buried in Boston but he can’t find a cemetery anywhere willing to take the body.

And, of course, one of Massachusetts’ many Democrat politicians, State Sen. Harriet L. Chandler (D-Worcester) is clamoring for the federal government to step in a provide for the disposal of Tsarnaev’s carcass somewhere’s else other than any place in Massachusetts.

The federal government needs to step in. But I’m not sure what they’re going to do or where will they go.

Frankly, I don’t understand the problem. Don’t they have landfills in Massachusetts? They should just drop the pig-fucker’s carcass in a wood chipper, bag the resulting slurry, and send it to the most convenient dump with the rest of trash. Neither money, time, nor consideration should be wasted on the Tsarnaevs.

Related Reading:

The trail of the baby killer Kermit Gosnell has gone to the jury for deliberation on the seven counts of First Degree Murder of infants, a count of the Third Degree Murder of Karnamaya Mongar, and sundry other, lesser crimes.

The jury may take a while to reach a verdict because the murders of those seven babies carry the possibility of the death sentence for Gosnell and most juries will deliberate quite long before rendering a verdict that can lead to the extermination of a felon. Most likely though, the matter is not strongly in doubt.

It’s certainly the case that Gosnell’s flamboyant defense attorney, Jack McMahon closed his case with a closing non-argument that proved that he had no argument in defense of his client.

“Dr. Gosnell is not the only one doing abortions in Philadelphia,” McMahon said, “but he was an African American singled out for prosecution.”

“We know why he was targeted,” he said. “If you can’t see that reality, you’re living in some sort of la-la land.”

It is a simple and incontrovertible fact that each and every time, without fail or exception, that anyone plays the race card in defense of some minority’s actions or lack of actions it is the case that they have no argument of facts, substance, or worth to present in that defense. Hence. McMahon’s closing argument is laughable at best.

Related Reading: