The Liberal Samaritan

Posted in Humor, Politics on October 20th, 2014

Liberal Samaritan
The Liberal Samaritan

Yes, this sort of behavior, as opposed to personal charity, would be the expected behavior of the Liberal Samaritan.

Liberals never seem to favor personally helping those in need as this might disadvantage themselves compared to others who might not be- or be in a position to be equally charitable. Hence, the aid the Liberal Samaritan is willing to give is limited to that which costs all equally, thereby not materially disadvantaging themselves relative to others.

Related Reading:

Hyperbole and a Half: Unfortunate Situations, Flawed Coping Mechanisms, Mayhem, and Other Things That Happened
Things That Matter: Three Decades of Passions, Pastimes and Politics
The Good Samaritan Strikes Again
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life (Norton Paperback)

Collective Tyranny

Posted in Politics on October 19th, 2014

It is easy to think of the evils of America’s domestic enemies, the Liberal, Progressives, and their minority tenants, to be solely or primarily assaults upon American citizens’ natural right to individual liberty. Yet, while they do repeatedly attack some our our Divinely ordained individual rights, mostly those that could be disruptive, e.g., those of defense and speech, these Leftist enemies far more often attack American communities and various and sundry collective endeavors. This is because our domestic enemies are devoutly loyal and faithful to their own collective, the State.

For this reason the Liberal and Progressives are not opposed to individual liberty because most individual liberties, far from being the effect of emancipation from the power of the State, are, in point of fact, a key precondition of the State’s power. In the twisted minds of the Left the State must be the penultimate, preferably only, collective agency. They seek a collective tyranny with the state operating in a tyrannical manner to quash any other collective associations.

They do not sek to wage war against the individual; they wage their war against those non-coercive, intermediate institutions which claim the individual’s allegiance: the family, the church, the school, business, and so on and so forth. The Liberals and Progressives demand that an individual be wedded exclusively to the State as an exclusive community, and offer him a certain limited range of freedom in exchange. It is not individual liberty that these would-be tyrannts oppose, but competitors to their authority that they find utterly unacceptable. They do not mind individual freedom; they only mind competitors to the allegiance they require of men. They are willing to give men a long leash, so as long as they and they alone are grasping the other end.

In other words, despite State not being a community, our domestic enemies demand that the State be the only community that is allowed. They know that when people’s lives, hopes, and aspirations are severed from family, church, and vocation, they are an easy prey for the State.

Related Reading:

War Collectivism
Communities (People)
Community/Public Health Nursing: Promoting the Health of Populations, 6e
The Myth of Individualism: How Social Forces Shape Our Lives
Progressive Care Nursing Certification: Preparation, Review, and Practice Exams

Crimes Of War

Posted in Humor, Politics on October 4th, 2014

Barack Obama: murderer and war criminal
Obama – The Never-to-be-Indicted War Criminal?

Do you think the Liberals and Progressive living within and off of America will ever demand that Obama be tried for warcrimes and crimes against humanity? Nah, I don’t either…That’d be racist. :lol:

Related Reading:

Damascus Diary: An Inside Account of Hafez al-Assad's Peace Diplomacy, 1990-2000
Election: Dezinformatsiya and the Great Game
America 1844: Religious Fervor, Westward Expansion, and the Presidential Election That Transformed the Nation
Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform
Hypocrisy