Fearing Greatness

Fear Greatness
Fearing Greatness

It’s really no surprise that Democrats and the Liberals, Progressives, and minorities that they enable and pander to fear greatness. Their entire sociopolitical platform, their very doctrine and dogma, can’t survive a great America. Such a thing, were it to come to pass, would uplift too many and make them irrelevant.

Bitter ClingersWe’ve Got To Shake Off The Bitter Clingers

So were going to have to spend a lot of time better spent elsewhere and a lot of effort better turned towards restoring America in shaking loose these bitter clingers who demand that America be less than great.

Related Reading:

Pure Land, Real World: Modern Buddhism, Japanese Leftists, and the Utopian Imagination (Pure Land Buddhist Studies)
Primary Greatness: The 12 Levers of Success
Real Reasons To Vote Democrat: A Comprehensive Guide
Obama: The Call of History
My Brother's Keeper: George McGovern and Progressive Christianity (Culture, Politics, and the Cold War)

Tags: | | | | | | | |

Unchallenging Challenge

President Donald J. TrumpYesterday, President Trump announced that he plans to re-examine federal requirements that regulate the fuel efficiency of new cars and trucks. The Lamestream Enemedia instantly characterized it as the President’s moving forcefully against Obama-era environmental rules – because, of course, hysteria is their sole stock and trade and they know that the Warmists will go even further insane if properly goaded.

Vastly unsurprisingly, the truth of the matter is different than the MSM’s spin upon it. President Trump’s decision to re-evaluate Obama’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) emissions targets is a rather unchallenging challenge to the supposed centerpiece of Obama’s strategy to combat global warming. While it’s true that Obama’s EPA had promulgated regulations for cars and trucks that required auto manufacturers to reach a fleet-wide average of 54.5 mpg by 2025, it is also true that this rule was supposed to be reviewed in 2018 – but, in January – just seven days before Obama left office, the boy decided to cancel the review process. All that President Trump has promised to do is to reinstate the original, promised review of the CAFE standards that Obama imposed in 2012.

So really, like almost everything President Trump and his new administration has done so far, this is neither reason for Liberals and Progressives to scream, nor cause for Right Wing pundits and talking heads to crow and gloat.

Related Reading:

And That's the Way It Isn't: A Reference Guide to Media Bias
ESSENCE The Obamas: The White House Years
The Art of the Automobile: The 100 Greatest Cars
The Politics Book (Big Ideas Simply Explained)
Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Obama Wiretapped Trump

Obama Wiretapped TrumpPresident Trump has “accused” Obama of having wiretapped his telephones and data connections at Trump Tower during the 2016 election cycle. The President’s allegation, made as it was through Twitter, lit the internet on proverbial fire. The Lamestream Enemedia wasted no time is deriding the President’s claim and Obama’s spokesman, Kevin Lewis quickly fired back with a denial of any wrongdoing on the ex-President’s part.

Of course, these denials are almost Clintonian is their use of facts that don’t necessarily – depending on what words and terms mean – lead to the truth.

The facts of the matter are that the FBI did twice seek to gain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) court warrants to wiretap Trump’s communications and those of several of his advisers. The first attempt in June, 2016 was denied. The second, narrower request, now focused on a server in Trump Tower, in October, 2016 was granted.

So during the 2016 elections the FBI did conduct surveillance of Trump’s assets in Trump Towers, i.e., they did wiretap him, though this may have been limited to electronic communications and did not included telephony, which i what most of people still think of when wiretapping is brought up.  So, for the purposes of the truth and culpability, it comes down to the Clintonian question of what words and phrases mean, a particularly form of verbal tap-dancing that Obama has always been quite skilled at.

The FBI is ultimately under the authority of US Attorney General, during the time frame in question an Obama Appointee. So whether or not the wiretapping was done by the Obama Administration comes down to where you draw the line around the term “Obama Administration” and from whom exactly the order ultimately came from.

As to whether or not Obama “had” Trump’s assets tapped, that is a matter of great and fruitless conjecture. Obviously, Obama didn’t formally order the surveillance operation. No POTUS can formally and legally order such surveillance except in very limited circumstances that didn’t apply in this case. That, however, doesn’t address an informal, verbal order, suggestion, or spoken lament – Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest? – that Obama might have made to AG Loretta Lynch.

Then, we come to “had” vs. “known of” and “approved.” Personally, I find it hard, though not impossible, to lend credence to the idea that the FBI would undertake such a very, very sensitive operation – as proven from the fallout thereof – without walking it up the chain of command to get at least verbal approval for it. Hence, it seems very unlikely to me that Obama wasn’t both apprised of the planned investigation of the opposing party’s presidential candidate and given the chance to quash it before it started.

Related Reading:

Lies Women Believe: And the Truth that Sets Them Free
FBI & an Ordinary Guy - The Private Price of Public Service
Wiretaps: A Complete Guide for the Law and Criminal Justice Professional
Yuge!: 30 Years of Doonesbury on Trump
Democracy Betrayed: The Rise of the Surveillance Security State

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | |