Archive for December, 2009

Thugs Attack Red Cross

Posted in Politics, Society on December 27th, 2009

It seems that the subhuman thugs in the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and SEIU unions are more interested in maintaining their control and privileges than in the lives of American men, women, and children.

As America entered into winter and the holiday season, a time of year when blood donations are at their lowest levels and are the most urgently needed, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, SEIU’s sister union and member of the filth, Anna Burger’s Change to Win labor coalition, took advantage of this “opportunity” to go on strike on December 4th against the American Red Cross Blood Services Pennsylvania – New Jersey Region.

Subhuman Union Thugs Attack the Red Cross - Why does America still allow these vermin to live and to pollute our nation with their presence. They should all be exterminated!
Subhuman Thugs Who Should And Must Be Exterminated

The situation rapidly grew worse as the ghetto thugs and assorted misborn vermin illegally blocked critically necessary blood deliveries.

The Red Cross says it had to inform union members that a two-year-old child’s life depended on our blood delivery before they would allow a Red Cross vehicle to exit the yard to get the necessary blood products to the hospital.

Big Government

Fortunately the Red Cross was able to swiftly get a Court Injunction against these mockeries of mankind and the needed blood was delivered – under duress – to the patients in the more than 100 hospitals held hostage by these scum.

Of course these misbegotten crotch-droppings weren’t satisfied with merely holding 100 hospitals dependent upon Red Cross blood supplies hostage. Various other gangs from the Teamsters union targeted to other unrelated private businesses in the area conducting their own blood drives and tried to use their standard intimidation techniques to prevent them from happening.

Americans need to wake up and take whatever means are necessary to remove the now existential these thuggish vermin pose. Expect no help from Obama’s government and little, if any help from the law until its too late and take those facts into account when you plan your actions.

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. ;)

Related Reading:

New Jersey Atlas & Gazetteer
I Saw Santa in New Jersey
Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 9): Improving Health and Reducing Poverty
Teamster Power
2018 New Jersey PSI Real Estate Exam Prep Questions and Answers: Study Guide to Passing the Salesperson Real Estate License Exam Effortlessly

Unconstitutional Mandate

Posted in Politics on December 26th, 2009

President Obama and his Liberals who are currently ruling in Congress have never come up with an actual answer to the question of by what authority do they believe that they have the right to force Americans to purchase health insurance – or any other product for that matter as a precondition of legally living in America.

This question of whether or not the government the right to mandate such purchases is not a new question. Americans were under a similar threat in the 1990s when it was ObamaCare’s predecessor, HillaryCare that the traitorous Left was trying to ram down Americans’ throats.

Excerpt from the Congressional Budget Office’s Memorandum, The Budgetary Treatment Of An Individual Mandate To Buy Health Insurance, circa August, 1994.


A mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of federal action. The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government.

Federal mandates typically apply to people as parties to economic transactions, rather than as members of society. For example, the section of the Americans with Disabilities Act that requires restaurants to make their facilities accessible to persons with disabilities applies to people who own restaurants. The Federal Labor Standards Act prohibits employers from paying less than the federal minimum wage. This prohibition pertains to individuals who employ others. Federal environmental statutes and regulations that require firms to meet pollution control standards and use specific technologies apply to companies that engage in specific lines of business or use particular production processes. Federal mandates that apply to individuals as members of society are extremely rare. One example is the requirement that draft-age men register with the Selective Service System. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is not aware of any others imposed by current federal law.

Of course one cannot expect differently from misborn filth like Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and their followers. In whatever passes for their hearts they are not only not Americans, but have a deep and abiding hatred of America and all it has ever stood for. It should come as no surprise that these enemies of America would metaphorically wipe their asses the US Constitution in order to further consolidate their hold on power and to “rebuild” America in a foul and twisted mockery of what it has been.

So what can Americans do about this? How can we defend ourselves, our children, and the fabric of our nation against these domestic enemies and the abhorrent filth they have insinuated into the federal government?

Shall we Americans hope that John L. Perry’s prediction is correct and that our military will remember and adhere to the oaths that they have sworn before their God(s)?

I, _____ (NAME), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____(RANK) do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God!

That would be a sad and harsh thing to hope for or to have happen. It may well be necessary in the light of the current situation, but the ramifications of such an event are staggering.

I think it would be better – though that’s not saying much – if Americans took matters into their own hands to end the threat. We Americans still have the means to do so, both through the much preferred legal efforts and – as a last resort if the Liberals and their filth continue to ignore such methods – through more direct means.

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. 😉

Related Reading:

Gospel Treason: Betraying the Gospel With Hidden Idols
Freedom: A Novel (Oprah's Book Club)
Health Policy and Politics: A Nurse's Guide
When the Senate Worked for Us: The Invisible Role of Staffers in Countering Corporate Lobbies
Food Freedom Forever: Letting Go of Bad Habits, Guilt, and Anxiety Around Food by the Co-Creator of the Whole30

Surrendering Respect

Posted in Politics on December 25th, 2009

New York's Governor, David PatersonIt seems that the unelected, embattled, racist who currently fouls the New York State Executive Mansion in Albany, NY, David Paterson has an image problem. People keep referring to him by his first name instead of showing the “proper obeisance” and calling him by the unearned title of “Governor.”

It seems that, no matter what venue he is in, people keep referring to him as, “David,” though many quickly “correct” themselves afterward. Many just do not view Mr. Paterson as an especially elevated or intimidating figure.

This is something that bothers the political operatives that the DNC has provided to Paterson.

Being called David can undercut that improvement, and undermine his perceived authority. “I rarely hear the word governor. I always hear David,” said George Arzt, a campaign strategist who advises Democratic candidates in New York. “On the one hand, it’s charming, in a campaign sort of way, that he’s one of the people. On the other hand, it shows he’s not feared.”

What is important in Arzt’s lament is the use of “fear” instead of “respect.” Paterson’s campaign strategists have surrendered any thought of- or desire for the wildly unpopular Paterson to be respected by the people of New York; they’re wishing for him to be feared instead.

A man worthy of being called such desires respect, both for himself and for those things he supports.  A thug, deserving and having no respect for itself or its own agenda, desires to be feared.

It’s also a risky strategy. Americans aren’t cowards and have a tendency to rightfully “remove” things that cause them or their families fear. Paterson is blind; he’d never see the bullet. 😉

Yet – the misbegotten mockery of mankind, Paterson, aside – isn’t such an attitude as George Arzt’s both indicative and typical of the attitude of the new misborn breed of Liberal that has usurped control of the Democrat party both in New York and across our beleaguered nation?

To govern a people requires mutual respect. But Americans have already seen that this new breed of Liberal – Statists who advance a diseased, anti-American, mongrel hybridization of Socialism and Italian Fascism – have little or no interest in governance; they desire to rule.

Related Reading:

The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
Fear: Trump in the White House
Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps
Jung`s Red Book For Our Time: Searching for Soul under Postmodern Conditions Volume 1
Bread and Roses, Too