Violate Or Be Violated

Posted in Politics on February 26th, 2015

Obama - Mexican FlagObama’s response Judge Andrew S. Hanen, of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas, ruling in favor of Texas and the 25 other states that had the temerity to challenge Obama’s unilateral immigration “reform” actions is classic Obama attitude – petulant and arrogant.

Despite the federal court’s injunction against carrying out Obama’s unilateral immigration policy changes, Obama has made it clear to all ICE and Border Patrol employees that they must carryout his wishes or face “consequences.”

Until we pass a law through Congress, the executive actions we’ve taken are not going to be permanent; they are temporary. There are going to be some jurisdictions and there may be individual ICE official or Border Control agent not paying attention to our new directives. But they’re going to be answerable to the head of Homeland Security because he’s been very clear about what our priorities will be.

– Barack Obama

It’s part of the law of Obama’s jungle – violate or be violated.

That’s the way it seems to be within the Obama Regime. You do what Obama demands, even if it’s in violation of court order, or you will be violated yourself.

And, of course, America’s domestic enemies are all for this sort of thing.

Related Reading:

The Politics Book (Big Ideas Simply Explained)
Politics (Dover Thrift Editions)
Amnesty after Atrocity?: Healing Nations after Genocide and War Crimes
The UCC Connection: How To Free Yourself From Legal Tyranny
Immigration Law (Quick Study: Law)

Unlawful Combatants

Posted in Politics on February 24th, 2015

Judge's Gavel on American FlagOn Monday, February 16, 2015, a mere one day before Obama’s sweeping executive actions on immigration would have allowed illegal immigrants to begin applying for work permits and legal protection, Judge Andrew S. Hanen, of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas, ruled in favor of Texas and 25 other states that had challenged Obama’s unilateral immigration actions and issued an injunction against carrying out these changes to the law.

Obama’s White House will, of course, challenge this ruling and battle it in the federal court system, possibly with it ending up in from of the SCOTUS in the relatively near future. That challenge is to be expected and is largely immaterial in the larger, deeper scope of America’s tribulations. There are bigger issues.

The bigger, deeper, and more fundamentally dangerous issue that this relates to is that almost half of the Democrats don’t believe that Obama should listen to- or abide by federal court rulings.

Should the president have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country?

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 26% of Likely U.S. Voters think the president should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country. Sixty percent (60%) disagree and say the president should not have the right to ignore the courts. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.

But perhaps more unsettling to supporters of constitutional checks and balances is the finding that 43% of Democrats believe the president should have the right to ignore the courts. Only 35% of voters in President Obama’s party disagree, compared to 81% of Republicans and 67% of voters not affiliated with either major party.

Yes, you read that right. 43% of Democrats believe that Obama shouldn’t be bound or constrained by the federal courts, 22% aren’t sure, and only 35% Democrats think he should be bound by the federal courts’ decisions.

Obama Worship
All Hail Barack Obama

So one of the most horrific and potentially destructive problems facing America and Americans is that almost half of the Democrats are not just Statists, not just Anti-Federalist, but in favor of a tyrannical, autocratic presidency which unbound by- and unbeholden to the laws of the land set forth in the check and balances demanded by the Constitution.

If war is politics by other means than politics is just war by other means. These beings within the borders of our nation are not our opponents, they’re our enemies. An the very lawless, tyrannical nature of rule they desire makes them unlawful combatants. We, the People should treat them and such with no restraint and extreme prejudice.

Related Reading:

The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State
Undocumented: How Immigration Became Illegal
Trust Betrayed: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the Selling Out of America's National Security
Immigration: Tough Questions, Direct Answers (The Skeptic's Guide)
Resistance to Tyranny: A Primer

Legalized Genocide

Posted in Politics, Society on January 29th, 2015

Ann CoulterIt’s a fact that Ann Coulter, the “shock jock” of sociopolitical thought and commentary, essentially makes her rent by utterly kissing off Liberals, Progressives, and their various and sundry sharecropping minority tenants by speaking truth in the most inflammatory manner. The important thing to remember, however, is that much of what Coulter says is the truth even if it is delivered in the most polarizing manner possible.

A perfect example of this is her pithy commentary upon “immigration reform” in the US:

If this sort of drastic change were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning the fact that current immigration law is intentionally designed to reduce their percentage in the population.

– Ann Coulter
Bush’s America: Roach Motel (2007)

Liberals, Progressives, and the non-Whites they farm for votes have always behaved as if reducing Whites to a minority in America was the goal of immigration, though the Blacks’ glee over it amuses me. The “Browning of America” is seen by them to be a good and worthy goal in and of itself or so their rhetoric makes it seem.

If this same attitude and rhetoric was applied to any other, non-White demographic is would be decried as cultural genocide. Indeed, various activist and “civil rights” groups would be in the courts filing lawsuit after lawsuit against it…and rioting and looting in “protest” against it and those that espoused it.

So Ann Coulter spoke the truth. “Immigration reform” is an attempt by the Left at legalized genocide of White culture in America.

Related Reading:

A Is for America
Godless: The Church of Liberalism
Coming to America: A History of Immigration and Ethnicity in American Life
The Devil in the White City:  Murder, Magic, and Madness at the Fair that Changed America
Get the Truth: Former CIA Officers Teach You How to Persuade Anyone to Tell All