It is self-evident that no number of men, by conspiring, and calling themselves a government, can acquire any rights whatever over other men, or other men’s property, which they had not before, as individuals. And whenever any number of men, calling themselves a government, do anything to another man, or to his property, which they had no right to do as individuals, they thereby declare themselves trespassers, robbers, or murderers, according to the nature of their acts.
jonolan on New Client, New Problem: “😆 I’m always going to advocate for both. It be too hypocritical for me to do otherwise.” Sep 21, 07:03
Tyler, the Portly Politico on New Client, New Problem: “My top two from this exquisite collection: 1.) https://i0.wp.com/blog.jonolan.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/1/nggallery/need-new-shirts/08.jpg?ssl=1 2.) https://i0.wp.com/blog.jonolan.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/1/nggallery/need-new-shirts/12.jpg?ssl=1 I can’t figure out the winner! Tuscan bouffant or…” Sep 20, 18:59
jonolan on Bikini Interlude 92: “At the risk of poorly extrapolating your position, I’d say that you prefer a more natural, less worked at /…” Jul 28, 08:50
You would think that a large portion of the Feminists would be turning against the Democrats, given how that political organization has been treating them over the last few years.
Confusingly and sadly – more the latter, because it makes sense if you account for selfishness and evil – these womyn will put up with any abuse from the Dems as long as they can kill their unborn children at will, for any any reason or no reason at all.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 4th, 2024 at 9:27 am and is filed under Politics, Society.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Yes, not too surprisingly, Disney has “canceled” The Acolyte. It will not be given a second season. The saga of the lesbian space witches has died… though, maybe it should be described as DEI’d, given the nature of the series’ agenda-driven creation. 😉
Perhaps putting out a series with no connection to any of the proven story arcs and then making sure to make it not just non-canonical, but actively anti-canonical was a stupid idea. Forcing a #Woke agenda into it was certainly a mistake and an easily avoidable one.
And, in response to their show’s failure, Leslye Headland and Kathleen Kennedy – the woke womyn running The Acolyte – went full-on Bud Light, even though everyone should know that you never go full-on Bud light.
Yeah, taking a page out of Alissa Heinerscheid’s playbook and insulting and attacking the core customers when they choose not to partake of something that wasn’t made for them and was apparently made to alienate them is a level of self-destructive stupidity that I thought was now well-understood and deprecated. But Disney’s DEI hires have proved me wrong.
At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. Even if the fanbase is everything evil and horrid that these two claim them to be, it doesn’t matter. Headland and Kennedy had one job and one job only – to make a television series that was profitable for their employer, Disney. In that they failed utterly, completely, and humiliatingly. They created something that very few people watched and spent $180 million doing so.
In point of fact, if the Star Wars fanbase is everything evil and horrid that these two claim them to be, it was Headland’s and Kennedy’s sole job to produce a series that catered to their desires, prejudices, and preconceptions, unless there were credible studies definitively showing that their was a large enough replacement audience to make the series profitable despite it not being accepted by the existing fanbase.
One either produces a series that people will watch and, hence, provide profit or you have failed. It doesn’t matter why they watched or didn’t watch. All that matters is whether they did or didn’t. And, in the case of The Acolyte, not enough people by a wide margin watched it because it wasn’t something anyone wanted to see and spend their time on.
This entry was posted on Friday, August 23rd, 2024 at 9:35 am and is filed under Society.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Between having been a gamer since the days of Wizardy and Eamon (actually created and published adventure for that), having been involved in historical reenactment for almost as long, participating in certain weapons-based sports, and being “adjacent” to various Hollywood personalities who work in the Scifi-Fantasy genre, the “issues” surrounding women’s armor in game, film, and written works is something that I’m forced to endure on a fairly regular basis.
So, here she is – the Hollywood star we need: Brigitte Bardiche, in all her full-coverage, fairly historically accurate armor. And… with a bardiche, which is one of my favorite weapons along with its close, Scottish cousin, the lochaber axe.
NOTE: This is such a sensitive, “triggering,” and pervasive issue that I’m sure, if various pundits read this, they will find some way to take issue with her armor.
This entry was posted on Monday, March 11th, 2024 at 11:00 am and is filed under Humor, Society.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Parents – specifically you fathers, since I’m unsure of women’s participation – it’s my opinion that you need to raise your sons right. You need to raise them to have the basic life skills, particularly cooking and cleaning. You need to raise your sons in a manner that reduces the material value of women to them to recreation and reproduction. Do not let them grow up saddled and chained with any other need for women!
Yes, I know. Cue the feminazi cunts screaming “Misogyny!” Gods, how they hate the thought of strong, independent men, even though most them wouldn’t willingly do domestic task for men. 😆
Honestly, why wouldn’t you raise your sons to be strong, independent, self-sufficient men? Why would you even want them to be dependent upon another for their basic needs, especially a womyn of today? It’s not like they will provide your son anything of intrinsic value beyond sex and children, if he wishes to sire any. The days when daughters were raised to have value to men are gone; they seem to have died with Gen X.
I Don’t Need A Woman. I Can Cook Myself Dinner
Face it; the hate and vitriol this post would generate – if they actually read it – among the majority of Western females today is strong evidence, if not outright proof, of the accuracy and wisdom of its premise. Further, if we look at womyn’s tendency to divorce and the courts’ bias against men in said divorce, there is empirical proof that women should face an uphill struggle to prove to men that their worth to them offsets the risks involved in taking them on. And, Gentlemen, I don’t see many of the ones of your sons’ generation even considering doing that.
The Best Thing A Man Can Ever Learn Is To Never Need A Woman
Honestly, the best thing fathers can do for their sons and for the future of our society is to teach them how to never need a woman for anything other than sex and bearing their children. Teach your sons all the life skills necessary – irrespective of traditional genders roles, which have been more and more rejected by women in recent decades – to be self-sufficient.
To be extraordinarily crass, crude, and blunt, fathers need to teach their sons that what a woman “brings to the table” insofar as value-add in a relationship are: three holes, two tits, and a womb. If you’ve raised them right, women can offer them nothing else that they need, allowing your son’s to choose as, when, and if they please.
Because You Don’t Require Her Help, You Don’t Need Her; You Want Her. There Is A Difference.
But here’s the thing that most people, and pretty all the feminists and their supposedly “high value” women, won’t get about this post. I’m not suggesting father teach their sons to hate women. Nor do I believe it’s “misogynist” to raise them to see no need for women beyond sex and childbearing. There’s a fundamental difference between needs and desires. And, as the same feminstas who would decry this post have taught their daughters, good relationships aren’t based upon dependency.
But, it’s truly ironic that these same womyn who taught their daughters this lesson, albeit in the nastiest, most hate-filled, and self-destructive context, go ballistic when the genders are reversed and it’s men who are taught not to need them. 😉
This entry was posted on Friday, May 12th, 2023 at 12:00 pm and is filed under Society.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Cue the crazed Feministas! Apparently, the “Patriarchy” now intends to use permanently comatose (PVS) and brain dead (BD/DNC) women as wombs. Because we all know these sorts will be stridently and possibly violently opposed to Whole Body Gestational Donation (WBGD). Insofar as they’re concerned, this is just a call for Zombie Handmaids ala some twisted and rather gross Z Day version of Gilead.
But hey! We could call it 40 Weeks After! 😆
Or not. You see, this is outrage based, at least partially on pure, unadulterated, Feminist ignorance and their dystopian fantasies of oppression – especially when it comes to bearing children. It has little to no intersection with reality.
The truth is that the idea of women doing Whole Body Gestational Donation wasn’t published in a medical journal. It was published in a medical ethics journal, specifically Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. By their very nature a large portion of the papers in such publications are speculative in nature and overtly seek to find, or even push, the boundaries of acceptable practice within the medical field.
Another, even more ironic truth, is that the paper was written in late 2022 by a woman, one Dr. Anna Smajdor PhD, who is currently a tenured professor of Practical Philosophy at the University of Oslo. Even more ironic is that she based a great deal of her paper on the previous work done by another woman, Rosalie Ber, who apparently originally floated the idea of using comatose women as gestational surrogates.
Yessiree! The entire concept of WBGD was conceived by women – Smajdor is even the person to name it. But the Patriarchy!
But, In Some Defense Of Feminists
None of the above is meant to say that nothing heinous could come of Smajdor’s and Ber’s idea now that it’s been put out there. Rahm Emanuel’s Complete Lives System and how it was implemented to some extent during COVID-19 shows us that sometimes published speculative ethics are essentially an excuse for normatively reprehensed behavior. There’s always room for doctors – who play God far too often – to behave badly.
And, as well, there’s the legal issues of consent – issues that Smajdor did mention, but didn’t and can’t address. And there’s a long if not common history of arguments over what to do with people who are PVS or BD/DNC, with next of kin often being the ones to make those decisions for the “living remains” of the victim. So yeah, it’s not utterly impossible that a husband or parent could make the legal decision for a PVS or BD/DNC to enter into WBGD, but it would be a vanishingly rare occurrence.
~*~
So, they’re not completely wrong in their worries – if worrying about WBGD is valid in the first place – but it’s not the Patriarchy and it’s not a likely outcome. Men are not going to turn them into Zombie Handmaids.
This entry was posted on Thursday, February 16th, 2023 at 9:00 am and is filed under Society.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Announcement
Due to issues between the latest version of WordPress and my gallery plugin, galleries are currently broken. As a workaround, right-click gallery thumbnails and choose Open in New Tab or New Window.