Equality Of Result

Posted in Politics on August 3rd, 2011

The Liberals’ idea of race relations and mitigating the racism that they see everywhere – except in the mirror or in the eyes of non-Whites – has always centered on accommodation, appeasement, excuses, and lowering standards in order to foster an equality of result. This has, in general, had poor results but was especially harmful to everyone when they applied it to creditworthiness.

Thomas Sowell sums up how well this helped the Blacks:

Government agencies, from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to the Federal Reserve leaned on lenders to lower lending standards, and the Department of Justice threatened prosecutions for discrimination if the racial makeup of people approved for mortgage loans did not match their preconceptions.

It worked. In fact, it worked so well that many blacks got loans that they could not have gotten otherwise.

Now the statistics tell us, belatedly, that blacks lost out, big time, from this “favor” done for them by politicians.

Reality being what it is, these Blacks who were handed loans that they didn’t except by grace of their skin color and Liberal stupidity qualify for, were “overrepresented” among those who later defaulted on their mortgages.

Of course a certain equality of outcome or result was achieved by the Liberals’ policies. The banks’ move to shield themselves from the inherent risks in sub-prime mortgages by bundling them into securities and the federal governments’ regulations that coerced financial firms to heavily buy those securities was a large part of what led to America’s current economic woes which have affected us all.

It’s a simple fact that lowering the standards and applying coercive force to ensure any form of demographic quotas can and will only achieve an equality of results when those results are negative and such negative results are the most likely outcome.

Related Reading:

The American Mortgage System: Crisis and Reform (The City in the Twenty-First Century)
The Nature of Prejudice: 25th Anniversary Edition
New Urban Housing
Homebuyers Beware: Whoâs Ripping You Off Now?--What You Must Know About the New Rules of Mortgage and Credit
The Subprime Solution: How Today's Global Financial Crisis Happened, and What to Do about It
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]

Why Muslims Fear Women

Posted in Humor, Religion, Society on January 30th, 2011
 

Muhammad and Aisha As the whole of humanity knows, Muslim males fear women. These mockeries of Man’s rampant and persistent “culture” of pedophilia, fondness for demanding female genital mutilation, disgusting abuse of- and violence towards any woman with a shred of dignity, and their staunch refusal allow them any right under Shari’a prove this fact.

Some would erroneously claim that the Muslim vermin hated women but they would be wrong. Subjugation that overt and that fierce is not born of hatred; it is born out of a deep and abiding pathological fear.

The question devolves to why do Muslim males fear women? I think there might be a simple answer to that question. ;-)

Sexy Niqaabi Domme

A Muslimah Walks Her Slave To The Market

Islam is submission; that is even the transliteration of the Arabic word, Islam, which is a verbal noun that is derived from the Arabic verb Aslama, which means “to accept, surrender or submit.” Indeed, the Arabic word for slave, Abd is based upon the same root as their word for worshiper, Abid.

As a culture of slaves, utterly unsuited and unwilling to accept the responsibilities of any higher station, they do so live in terror of a change in ownership and shifting from being Abdullah (Slave of God) to Abdul Koos (Slave of Pussy). :-P

Good Abdullah Might Get 72 Virgins After Death.
Good Abdul Koos Get…

Try as they do, I’m fairly sure they’re doomed to wear a new collar and pay “lip service” to their mistresses as opposed to the master created for them by their Pedophile Prophet.

Related Reading:

Unveiling Islam: An Insider's Look at Muslim Life and Beliefs
Bedtime Stories for Children You Hate
After the Arab Spring: How Islamists Hijacked the Middle East Revolts
The Complete Vermin Killer: A Valuable And Useful Companion For Families, In Town And Country (1777)
The Kindle Qur'an | Kindle Koran | Kindle Quran | Kindle Al-Qur'an (Definitive English Edition) Complete and Unabridged With Full Color Reproductions of ... Moslem | Qur'an | Koran | Quran | Al-Qur'an)
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]

The General Welfare

Posted in Politics on November 23rd, 2009

When dealing with the Liberals who willfully misuse and misinterpret the US Constitution to further their aims to replace America with a nation built upon their ideology of government mandated and controlled non-merit based equality of result it is useful to refer to what our Founding Father’s actually meant.

With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.

– “Father of the Constitution,” James Madison

Now, in truth, the Nanny-Statists of the Left care very little for Madison or his thoughts, but Americans do. Referring back to the words, wisdom, and thoughts of the “Father of the Constitution” is always prudent when Liberals foul our Constitution by daring to cite it as an excuse for their beliefs and goals.

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. ;)

Related Reading:

Practical politics; or, The liberalism of to-day
James Madison
Freedom, Spiced and Drunk
Politics: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer--and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]