Hillary’s Stolen Destiny

One sadly common refrain among America’s domestic enemies is that Hillary Clinton’s destiny was stolen from her, first by Barack Obama and then by Donald Trump. Disturbingly, the Left believed that Hillary was destined to be POTUS. Hence, her repeated defeats were the theft of that ordained outcome.

Hillary's Stolen Destiny
Hillary’s Stolen Destiny?

But what actual destiny of Hillary’s was stolen from her? Perhaps the destiny that was “stolen” from her was her ordained appointment with Death at the hands of an assassin. Perhaps her destiny was to be the fifth US President to be assassinated while in office.

One does have to wonder if that wasn’t the destiny many of them hoped for Hillary. Given her baggage and nefarious history she would have served them better as a martyr than as a POTUS

After all, we Americans who voted against Hillary are a seething, frothing, violent,unwashed, uneducated horde of deplorable, mouth breathing, knuckle dragging, sexist, misogynist, hoplophilic, patriarchal, Nazis – or so those who supported Hillary identify us as being. If that is the case, what other destiny than death could Hillary have had if elected?

And then there’s the #BernieBros and #BernieGirls, who would have had their own very definite and specific reasons to enact lethal reprisals upon Hillary if she had won the 2016 elections…

It could be that Mr. Trump did Hillary a favor by “stealing” her destiny. 😉 Probably not though. Obama survived eight years as POTUS and, despite the much-hyped hysteria that some racist would assassinate him, not a single credible threat ever got anywhere near him despite the ongoing poor service record by the Secret Service.

Related Reading:

Feminist Fight Club: A Survival Manual for a Sexist Workplace
The Flipside of Feminism: What Conservative Women Know -- and Men Can't Say
Destiny of the Republic: A Tale of Madness, Medicine and the Murder of a President
The Hate U Give
Insanity (Revised Edition, 10 DVDs & Book/Pamphlets/Chart Set)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Fridge Pogrom

Fridge Pogrom
I Think It’s Time For A Fridge Pogrom

Gentlemen – and some of you ladies – if your date / house guest feels compelled to bring an AR-15 with her when she goes to get a midnight snack, it’s far, far, far past time for a fridge pogrom. 😆

Related Reading:

The Lifestyle of a Watchman: A 21-Day Journey to Becoming a Guardian in Prayer
Deeper Dating: How to Drop the Games of Seduction and Discover the Power of Intimacy
Beach Babes 2018 Wall Calendar
The Onion Book of Known Knowledge: A Definitive Encyclopaedia Of Existing Information
The Guns of August: The Pulitzer Prize-Winning Classic About the Outbreak of World War I

Tags: | | | | | | | |

Fauxcahontas’ Failure

Fauxcahontas' Failures Are MyriadFauxcahontas’ Failure Of Gendered Wages

Once again Massachusetts’ Elizabeth Warren aka the Waba Squaw aka Fauxcahontas has made ripples across the internet and, once again, it’s because of her own failure. This time it’s her failure to “walk” as he “talks.”

In 2016, the Waba Squaw ranted that Equal Pay Day was a A National Day Of Embarrassment.

Today is Equal Pay Day, and by the sound of it, you would think it’s some sort of historic holiday commemorating the anniversary of a landmark day that our country guaranteed equal pay for women. But that’s not what this is about. Not even close.

I cannot believe we’re still standing here debating whether a woman should get fired for asking what the guy down the hall makes.

#EqualPayDay isn’t a national day of celebration. It’s a national day of embarrassment.

The game is rigged against women and families, and it has to stop. It is 2016, not 1916, and it’s long past time to eliminate gender discrimination in the workplace.

So far, that was just another tired rendition of the annual Feminist screed about women’s wages vs. those of men. Prima facie, it’s no more of a failure than any of its predecessors were or its successors will be. The specific failure on Fauxcahontas’ part was that she either didn’t know or didn’t that her own house was not in order.

It seems that Warren pays her female staffers significantly less than she does her male ones. Indeed, apparently the gendered “wage gap” in her staff outstrips America’s national average.

Last year’s figures, showing that women earned 79.6 percent of what men earned, put Equal Pay Day on Tuesday April 4, more than three months into the calendar year.

However, women working for Warren were paid just 71 cents for every dollar paid to men during the 2016 fiscal year, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The median annual earnings for women staffers, $52,750, was more than $20,000 less than the median annual earnings for men, $73,750, according to the analysis of publicly available Senate data.

When calculated using average salaries rather than median, the pay gap expands to just over $26,051, or about 31 percent.

Consistent with previous Free Beacon analyses of Senate salary data, only full-time staffers who were employed for the entire period in question were included in the calculations.

It be easy to just chalk this up to yet more hypocrisy from a Leftist, but think that’s unfair. I tend to think of it as more of an unavoidable failure on Fauxcahontas’ part than it is hypocrisy. I’m fairly sure that Warren wanted to have a more equal pay distribution by gender but couldn’t manage to do it because there were simply not enough women who were equally or better qualified for the mid-to-higher positions which she needed filled, which in turn skewed to average in favor of men. This also seems to me to compounded by men being more likely to bargain for higher starting salaries than women seem to be.

You see, the “Wage Gap,” as it is so often presented, is a pernicious myth that is promulgated by certain sorts to fulfill their own agendas and line their own pocketbooks.

Let’s all face facts. If this supposed “Wage Gap” actually existed as it is presented rather than as the result of the average woman’s work-life balance choices, this have created what amounted to an arbitrage opportunity in terms of human capital that even moderately business savvy people would have already exploited to great effect. They would have form firms comprised solely or primarily of these underpaid women and out-competed other firms with their comparatively over-paid men. The result of this arbitrage would have been to inevitably to close such gaps until they were no larger than the transaction costs of the arbitrage endeavor. But, of course, there’s no visible signs of this ever having happened…

Related Reading:

Bones Don't Lie (Morgan Dane)
The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger
Spy the Lie: Former CIA Officers Teach You How to Detect Deception
That's What She Said: What Men Need to Know (and Women Need to Tell Them) About Working Together
Dave Ramsey's ACT Your Wage! Board Game

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |