Dem’s Shithole Fishing

Dems Fishing At The Shithole
Dem’s Shithole Fishing For Votes & Tax Dollars

Be assured of one thing, My Fellow Americans; the Democrat politicians at both state and federal levels are not so enamored with immigration, legal or otherwise, out of any sense of compassion for these foreigners – especially the ones from the world’s shitholes. No, they’re just fishing for votes and tax dollars just as they always are.

It’s Not About Voter Fraud

This is not to say that these Dems are trying to- or expecting to get noncitizens to vote for them. No, thankfully, that sort of voter fraud is statistically nonexistent.

No, the primary sort of votes the Dems are fishing for is Electoral College votes and seatshence, votes – in the US House of Representatives. Truthfully, if they want to stay even marginally relevant in the post-2020 future, they have to keep fishing for immigrants. Americans and long-term foreign residents are fleeing the Blue States. The only thing allowing these states to mitigate the effects of this is through foreign immigrants like New York and California do.

But, of course, these Dem politicians are also looking for votes for themselves from their Liberal and Progressive constituencies, constituencies that have proven to be both rabidly fanatical on non-White immigration and prone to extreme responses to perceived waffling on this issue at all.

Well, this is true of White Democrats at least. The Congressional Black Caucus is a bit more specific in their support for immigration from shithole countries.

And, of course, Tax Money

It’s really just simple math – arithmetic really – much of the taxpayers’ monies distributed to the several states is done so based upon population either directly or indirectly. Given that the Dems’ bailiwicks would be in a rather steep population decline, they need immigrants, legal or otherwise, to bolster those numbers, lest they lose out.

And, lest we either forget or simply turn a blind eye, immigrants, mostly illegals, provide the labor force for many businesses that thrive in the urban zones where Democrats also flourish. That brings in state level tax dollars and resultant clout into these Democrat politicians grasp. A perfect example of this being the plethora of nail salons in and around NYC which are owned by Asian legal immigrants who, in turn, “hire” illegal immigrants – some of whom are victims of human trafficking – and keep them essentially enslaved and living in squalid conditions. Another example would be the various sweatshops that proliferate in urban, i.e., Democrat, zones such as NYC or Chicago.

These industries, some of whom can only be competitive against foreign companies through enacting the same horrid conditions as the sweatshops in the Third World, all provide taxes to the states. Frankly, given that, it’s not even surprising that Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL 23), former Chair of the DNC, said that illegal immigrants were the backbone of the economy.

~*~

Yes, do always remember that, whenever a Democrat politician makes a strong statement in favor of increased immigration, it’s not about compassion; it’s about and only about, self-interest and the interests of the Democrat Party professionals.

Related Reading:

Race, Reality, and Realpolitik: U.S.–Haiti Relations in the Lead Up to the 1915 Occupation
Electoral College Reform: Challenges and Possibilities (Election Law, Politics, and Theory)
Henry Burkhardt and LDS Realpolitik in Communist East Germany
Theories of International Politics and Zombies: Revived Edition
World Politics: Interests, Interactions, Institutions (Third Edition)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

GA-6’s Real Loser

GAA-6's Real Loser is Pelosi
GA-6’s Real Loser May Be Pelosi

Republican Karen Handel beat Democrat Jon Ossoff in the GA-6 special election runoff may be the actual result of the recent election, but the real loser of GA-6 may well be Nancy Pelosi. As the crazy, old bat is seen by many Democrats as one of the major reasons for Ossoff’s defeat.

Some Democrats want to replace Pelosi atop their caucus, as they have more and more since last November’s poor showing at the polls  they say that it will be impossible to get back into a Congressional majority with her as their leader.

I think you’d have to be an idiot to think we could win the House with Pelosi at the top. Nancy Pelosi is not the only reason that Ossoff lost. But she certainly is one of the reasons.

— Representative Filemon Vela Jr. (D-TX-34)

~*~

There comes a time when every leader has to say, ‘For the good of the order and for the betterment of the party, it’s time for me to step aside.’ And I wish that that would happen right now. This is not a personal thing. I want to get back in the majority.

— Representative Kathleen Rice (D-NY-4)

Yes, it looks like there’s a certain and growing amount of rancor against Pelosi and that more and more Democrats believe that she has become an anchor around their party’s neck. Simply put, irrespective of whether or not Pelosi is a competent negotiator and political sausage grinder, there’s the waxing belief that her public presence does more to aid Republicans seeking office than Democrats do so. And do remember that, at the end of the day, these are professional politicians. As such, they’re far more concerned about elections than legislating.

While I doubt that Pelosi will be removed as Minority Leader, I do see her having to defend herself and her privilege to hold that position as a clear sign that she’s suffered the greatest loss in GA-6’s election.

Related Reading:

Reversing the Apocalypse: Hijacking the Democratic Party to Save the World
The Blueprint: How the Democrats Won Colorado (and Why Republicans Everywhere Should Care)
Good Night Georgia (Good Night Our World)
Keeping Faith in Congress: Why Persistence, Compassion, and Teamwork Will Save Our Democracy
Elementary Statistics: From Discovery to Decision

Tags: | | | | | |

Exceptional Hypocrisy

The current hysterical attempt by America’s domestic enemies – the Liberals and Progressives and their front agency, the Democrat Party – to overturn the 2016 elections or, if that won’t succeed, to catastrophically undermine the incoming POTUS, Donald Trump, is centered upon Russia “having hacked the election” and ” impacted the integrity of our election.”

Exceptional Hypocrisy Indeed
It Was The Russians!

For the sake of argument, let us ignore the lack of evidence that Russia as a state actor was involved in the hacking. Let us give them the hand-out of that postulate so that we can focus on something more important than their tantrums and straw-clutching.

This is exceptional hypocrisy on their part – truly, horrifically, and irredeemably exceptional hypocrisy.

They’re complaining and driving America towards civil war – and no! that’s not hyperbole – because the Russians supposedly cost Hillary the election. This is hypocritical in the extreme because both the Obama Regime and they, themselves have inserted themselves into other nation’s elections and governments in order to affect a regime change.

And no! In the context of the Obama Regime I’m not speaking of interfering in Israel’s recent election in an attempt to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. That just isn’t plausible given the timing involved – not unless the CIA is actually better than Mossad. On the other hand, these same Liberals and Progressives were funding that effort.

No. I’m speaking of Iran’s Green Revolution and the so-called Arab Spring, both cases of the Obama Regime using propaganda, the release of information or threat thereof, and direct financial efforts to effect the outcome of elections or to oust existing government. All of these efforts fully endorsed and aided by the Leftists who are now screaming because somebody supposedly did the same thing to us.

In all fairness, wouldn’t this be our chickens coming home to roost? Or are these Liberals and Progressives tacitly admitting that the US is supposed to by somehow exceptional and exempt from being on the receiving end of what we do to other nations?

Related Reading:

The Coming Insurrection (Semiotext(e) / Intervention Series)
How to Win a Local Election
Politics (Dover Thrift Editions)
Hypocrisy and Integrity : Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of Politics
Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |