Pelosi: Quit Your Job

Posted in Politics on May 17th, 2010

The ever stupid House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, avowed enemy of all things American, said this week that thanks to Obamacare, musicians and other creative types could quit their jobs and focus on developing their talents because the American taxpayers would be forced to fund their federally mandated health insurance coverage.


Quit Your Job. Americans Will Be Forced To Pay For You!?!

Someone should really open up Pelosi’s skull and see if there is, in fact, a brain within it, and if so, what sort of pathology has affected it. Is it senile dementia, delusional schizophrenia, tertiary syphilis, or just advanced Liberalism? There has to be something wrong with her mind given the unending stream of inanity that she mouths.

Pelosi is a depraved and a parasite much akin to a liver fluke or a guinea worm and, much like her spiritual and intellectual kin, needs to be purged or excised from the body of America.

Oh Yes! Let is do our utmost to create a generation of parasites and force the dwindling number of hard-working Americans who love their country and spirit it embodied to be their hosts. That’s just what this country needs to get it back on its feet.

The extent to which Liberals such as Nancy Pelosi actively discourage the very productivity that is the life’s blood of their beloved and ever expanding entitlement programs, is staggering and astounding. It’s also self-destructive since parasites fail if and when they kill they their hosts.

If America is going to survive as a nation and a culture it is likely going to require surgery to rid itself of its current crop of parasites and diseases in vaguely human form. If we move quickly, we will only need the lancet; dawdling will result in the need for a currettement.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down.  ;-)

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]

The Source Of Rage

Posted in Politics on April 8th, 2010

The picture below perfectly sums up a large part of the fear and resultant rage against the politicians in the federal government that is being expressed by the American people in the form of the Tea Party movement.

A Little Girl Born Into Debt Thanks To The Government
I’m Already In Debt $38,375 And I Only Own A Dollhouse.

No; it’s not about the POTUS’ race, despite the Leftists and their minority tenants near-constant mendacious screeds to that effect. It’s about President Obama and his cabal Liberals bankrupting America and stealing the future from our children and our children’s children.

Remember that our progeny must live and die in the world we create for them, and that it is a parents holy duty to protect their children from any and all who would prey upon them.

The American people, by and large, love their children and wish for them to have betters lives than we have had. Only a relative few groups – mostly exilic groups sunk in crime, drug addiction, family dissolution, nihilism, and the resultant multi-generational poverty – try to indoctrinate and/or coerce their children to live in the same circumstances as they have rather than to move out, move on, and better themselves.

The source of the American people’s fear and rage is not racism; it’s a human parent’s natural response to anything or anyone who threatens their children or the children’s future.

Only two questions remain: how far will Americans have to go to protect our children and how far President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and their coterie of Liberals will go to continue preying upon our children and robbing them of their future liberty and opportunity to succeed by their own efforts, will, and ability?

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. ;-)

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]

Oddly, We Agree

Posted in Politics on April 2nd, 2010

Professor Jonathan Turley is an attorney, a legal scholar mostly specializing in Liberal interpretations of constitutional law, and a frequent commentator in many of the Leftist MSM’s papers and shows.  He also maintains an interesting blog, Res ipsa loquitur. Prof. Turley and I rarely agree on anything. That is why it is odd that he and I are in agreement on one of the more disturbing aspects of ObamaCare.

With this legislation, Congress has effectively defined an uninsured 18-year-old man in Richmond as an interstate problem like a polluting factory. It is an assertion of federal power that is inherently at odds with the original vision of the Framers. If a citizen who fails to get health insurance is an interstate problem, it is difficult to see the limiting principle as Congress seeks to impose other requirements on citizens. The ultimate question may not be how Congress can prevail, but how much of states’ rights would be left if it prevailed.

– Prof. Jonathon Turley
Is the Individual Mandate Constitutional?

Think about Prof. Turley’s statement, “If a citizen who fails to get health insurance is an interstate problem, it is difficult to see the limiting principle as Congress seeks to impose other requirements on citizens.” To any true American, one who would guard his liberty and that of his progeny, that is a chilling statement made all the more so because the reasoning mind can find little in the way of factual argument to refute it.

At this time (April 2, 2010) at least 14 States have filed federal lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the individual mandate portion of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid’s health insurance reconstruction legislation colloquially known as ObamaCare. So it is obvious that others besides myself agree with Turley’s estimation of the situation.

If the Gods are at all mercifully inclined towards America, these lawsuits will result in a key provision of ObamaCare, the individual health insurance mandate, being struck down on Constitutional grounds and the whole legislation having to go back to Congress in order to create a new – hopefully wiser and more American – rendition of the legislation.

So – oddly, Professor Turley and I are, for once, in agreement. It should be, but isn’t any longer, even odder that the one circumstance where two staunch proponents of differing views on so many issues can reach agreement is in opposition to President Obama and his agenda.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]