Damn! Look at all those racist countries out there past America’s borders. They all require a photo ID in order to vote. Hellfire! Some, e.g., India and Iraq, even physically mark voters after they cast their ballots.
Let’s face it; if requiring Voter ID is racist, as the Dems keep claiming, then these are a bunch of racist countries. Of course, you’ll never hear a Dem or likely Dem voter claim these countries are racist. Much like so many other “racially charged” things, the Dems only believe it’s wrong if America does it.
Funny how in these times, whenever a Democrat loses and election to a Republican – especially if said Dem is a Black and the Republican a White – and the votes are close, there’s now always some issue and there’s always some number of extra Democrat ballots found by them after the fact. :shock:Â It seems an awful lot like they have a supply of Emergency Democrat Votes, doesn’t it?
And it’s these sorts who rant so stridently that President Trump, the Electoral College, and anything, everything, and anyone except themselves is a threat to America’s democracy and the integrity of our electoral process.
Be assured of one thing, My Fellow Americans; the Democrat politicians at both state and federal levels are not so enamored with immigration, legal or otherwise, out of any sense of compassion for these foreigners – especially the ones from the world’s shitholes. No, they’re just fishing for votes and tax dollars just as they always are.
It’s Not About Voter Fraud
This is not to say that these Dems are trying to- or expecting to get noncitizens to vote for them. No, thankfully, that sort of voter fraud is statistically nonexistent.
No, the primary sort of votes the Dems are fishing for is Electoral College votes and seats – hence, votes – in the US House of Representatives. Truthfully, if they want to stay even marginally relevant in the post-2020 future, they have to keep fishing for immigrants. Americans and long-term foreign residents are fleeing the Blue States. The only thing allowing these states to mitigate the effects of this is through foreign immigrants like New York and California do.
But, of course, these Dem politicians are also looking for votes for themselves from their Liberal and Progressive constituencies, constituencies that have proven to be both rabidly fanatical on non-White immigration and prone to extreme responses to perceived waffling on this issue at all.
Well, this is true of White Democrats at least. The Congressional Black Caucus is a bit more specific in their support for immigration from shithole countries.
And, of course, Tax Money
It’s really just simple math – arithmetic really – much of the taxpayers’ monies distributed to the several states is done so based upon population either directly or indirectly. Given that the Dems’ bailiwicks would be in a rather steep population decline, they need immigrants, legal or otherwise, to bolster those numbers, lest they lose out.
And, lest we either forget or simply turn a blind eye, immigrants, mostly illegals, provide the labor force for many businesses that thrive in the urban zones where Democrats also flourish. That brings in state level tax dollars and resultant clout into these Democrat politicians grasp. A perfect example of this being the plethora of nail salons in and around NYC which are owned by Asian legal immigrants who, in turn, “hire” illegal immigrants – some of whom are victims of human trafficking – and keep them essentially enslaved and living in squalid conditions. Another example would be the various sweatshops that proliferate in urban, i.e., Democrat, zones such as NYC or Chicago.
These industries, some of whom can only be competitive against foreign companies through enacting the same horrid conditions as the sweatshops in the Third World, all provide taxes to the states. Frankly, given that, it’s not even surprising that Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL 23), former Chair of the DNC, said that illegal immigrants were the backbone of the economy.
Yes, do always remember that, whenever a Democrat politician makes a strong statement in favor of increased immigration, it’s not about compassion; it’s about and only about, self-interest and the interests of the Democrat Party professionals.
Democrats from Obama on down are ranting how Trump and the American people are harming the electoral process because we aren’t shy about telling telling the world that we fully expect it to be a rigged election, installing Hillary as POTUS irrespective of the actual will of we, the People.
Funny thing that, since the Democrats did it to a much greater extent and to greater, lasting harm to America’s electoral process back in 2000 when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore. It reeks of hypocrisy but is to be expected. Democrats and the sort that vote for them have always maintained a double standard, with Americans being held to a higher and stricter standard than those who tend to vote for Democrats.
On Tuesday, 18 October 2016, aging pop star Madonna raised some eyebrows by offering to give blow jobs to voters who cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton.
If you vote for Hillary Clinton, I will give you a blow job. OK? I’m really good. I’m not a douche and I’m not a tool. I take my time, I have a lot of eye contact and I do swallow.
OK, leaving aside the fact that any mention of oral sex and the Clintons is “matrimonially insensitive,” this begs the question of since when did prostitution become the manner in which women promoted other women in society, business, and/or politics?
Given that prostitution is rightfully called the oldest profession, I’d hazard the guess that it’s been the manner such things were done since we invented society, business, and politics. Think of it as the oldest PAC. 😛
Of course, the utter lack of outrage among the Feminists shows their hypocrisy in the matter. Given that even “Sex Positive” Feminists – is that an oxymoron or a unicorn? – are against blow jobs and stridently against swallowing, the lack of outrage on their part shows the world that they don’t have a moral position, only a political one.
And…There’s that pesky, little matter of US Federal law. Madonna’s offer to fellate men who vote for Hillary may run afoul of the penumbra of 18 U.S. Code Â§ 597. I’m force to say “may” because that statute requires an expenditure and one could easily argue that Madonna would be spending nothing to suck off these men. Indeed! One could argue that it’s the men who would be “spending.” 😆 Also, as prostitute isn’t legal in America, there may be an odd loophole where an illegal expenditure can’t be legally classed as an expenditure for purposes of the law.
NOTE: Just enjoy or hate the sarcasm. I’m very well aware that Madonna said this as part of her intro for comedienne Amy Schumer at her recent Madison Square Gardens performance. As such, this was all in good, “clean” fun. Hell! If it wasn’t, old Slick Willy would already be line up. 😛