There is all the difference in the world between treating people equally and attempting to make them equal. While the first is the condition of a free society, the second means as De Tocqueville describes it, ‘a new form of servitude.’
As the results of- and the Dems’ petty, utterly graceless, and insulting responses to the elections in both Florida and Georgia show, the Dems, especially the anti-White, race-baiting Blacks they come up with as candidates, will say and do anything to attack the process and the will of the voters, who rejected these sub-par individuals.
Both Gillum and Abrams claimed that they didn’t really lose and the that the results were because the elections were stolen from them via some combination of election fraud, voter suppression, and – of course, given these candidates – racism. And, as expected in these times, they spent the next couple of weeks engaging in bemoaning the “theft” and engaging in lawfare – and outright election fraud – against the victors and the People, who rejected these candidates as unworthy of office.
Be assured of one thing, My Fellow Americans; the Democrat politicians at both state and federal levels are not so enamored with immigration, legal or otherwise, out of any sense of compassion for these foreigners – especially the ones from the world’s shitholes. No, they’re just fishing for votes and tax dollars just as they always are.
It’s Not About Voter Fraud
This is not to say that these Dems are trying to- or expecting to get noncitizens to vote for them. No, thankfully, that sort of voter fraud is statistically nonexistent.
No, the primary sort of votes the Dems are fishing for is Electoral College votes and seats – hence, votes – in the US House of Representatives. Truthfully, if they want to stay even marginally relevant in the post-2020 future, they have to keep fishing for immigrants. Americans and long-term foreign residents are fleeing the Blue States. The only thing allowing these states to mitigate the effects of this is through foreign immigrants like New York and California do.
But, of course, these Dem politicians are also looking for votes for themselves from their Liberal and Progressive constituencies, constituencies that have proven to be both rabidly fanatical on non-White immigration and prone to extreme responses to perceived waffling on this issue at all.
Well, this is true of White Democrats at least. The Congressional Black Caucus is a bit more specific in their support for immigration from shithole countries.
And, of course, Tax Money
It’s really just simple math – arithmetic really – much of the taxpayers’ monies distributed to the several states is done so based upon population either directly or indirectly. Given that the Dems’ bailiwicks would be in a rather steep population decline, they need immigrants, legal or otherwise, to bolster those numbers, lest they lose out.
And, lest we either forget or simply turn a blind eye, immigrants, mostly illegals, provide the labor force for many businesses that thrive in the urban zones where Democrats also flourish. That brings in state level tax dollars and resultant clout into these Democrat politicians grasp. A perfect example of this being the plethora of nail salons in and around NYC which are owned by Asian legal immigrants who, in turn, “hire” illegal immigrants – some of whom are victims of human trafficking – and keep them essentially enslaved and living in squalid conditions. Another example would be the various sweatshops that proliferate in urban, i.e., Democrat, zones such as NYC or Chicago.
These industries, some of whom can only be competitive against foreign companies through enacting the same horrid conditions as the sweatshops in the Third World, all provide taxes to the states. Frankly, given that, it’s not even surprising that Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL 23), former Chair of the DNC, said that illegal immigrants were the backbone of the economy.
Yes, do always remember that, whenever a Democrat politician makes a strong statement in favor of increased immigration, it’s not about compassion; it’s about and only about, self-interest and the interests of the Democrat Party professionals.
As it’s almost time for another election in America and as we’ve someone who’s both a Democrat and a Black controlling the DoJ, let’s review the fact that not all ID requests are considered equal.
ID Requests Not Racist
ID Requests Are Racist
OPEN A BANK ACCOUNT
CASH A CHECK
APPLY FOR FOOD STAMPS*
APPLY FOR WELFARE
APPLY FOR MEDICAID
APPLY FOR SOCIAL SECURITY
APPLY FOR A JOB
APPLY FOR UNEMPLOYMENT
RENT A HOUSE
BUY A HOUSE
APPLY FOR A MORTGAGE
DRIVE A CAR
RENT A CAR
BUY A CAR
GET ON AN AIRPLANE
PURCHASE A GUN
ADOPT A PET
RENT A HOTEL ROOM
APPLY FOR A HUNTING LICENSE
APPLY FOR A FISHING LICENSE
BUY A CELL PHONE
VISIT A CASINO
GET A PRESCRIPTION
HOLD A RALLY OR PROTEST
DONATE YOUR BLOOD
BUY AN “M” RATED VIDEO GAME
* – There is an exception to the official ID requirements for foodstamps if the recipient can show that they’re homeless. It is not an easy or quick procedure though in most states, especially for those homeless not in some form of shelter.
Not All ID Requirements Are Equal
Yes, it’s true. The appropriateness and political correctness of states requiring government issued photo ID in order for a citizen or resident to purchase something or perform some action is ONLY considered racist by America’s domestic enemies when it involves voting and then only when that voting involves minorities, most specifically voting by the Blacks.
Apparently the Blacks seem to have some problem with acquiring a photo ID, something that the vast majority of Americans have no problem doing. Hence, insofar as they and their Liberal and Progressive enablers – and, of course, the Democrat party’s vote farmers – are concerned such things are racist solely because the Blacks seem to have some problem with meeting this simple requirement.
Of course, as is sadly normal for these sorts, our domestic enemies are far more laser focused on a specific result that favors themselves than in making America better. Consider that, if they focused upon getting the Blacks to meet the basic requirement of having a government issued photo ID, not only would voting requirements not be an issue but the Blacks would actually not be so disadvantaged in most facets of life by not having one in the first place.