The Dems And Biden

The Dems And Biden - A Summation
The Dems And Biden – A Summation

Yep. On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 – perhaps prophetically at High Noon, the Democrats are going to – barring “civic action” by patriots – swear in the man they’ve installed as President, Joe Biden. To sum that up: the Dems attacked President Trump for 4 years, using his investigation into the Biden family’s criminal and corrupt behavior, then use “alternative” voting methods to replace President Trump with the very criminal he was investigating.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

Biden – 55% President

Biden – 55% President

I know the image says 47% of voters, but, after reading several polls and trying to normalize the numbers, it seems to me that it’s 45% of voters who believe that Biden didn’t fairly and honestly win the 2020 Presidential Election.

Why such a large number and percentage of voters believe that the 2020 elections were rigged is rather immaterial, though a point of ongoing hatred and rancor for the Left. What’s important is that Biden is not going to an easy time in office with that many viewing him as a usurper.

When you add in the fact that there are at least as solid grounds to impeach Biden immediately upon his inauguration as there ever was to impeach President Trump, but the Democrats never, ever will, and you’ve got a recipe for an angry and disillusioned populace to take direct corrective action. After all, it’s not as if the ongoing, nationwide violence by the Blacks and their enablers has shown Americans that violence does sway people into at least saying that they endorse your views.

Yeah, it’s looking likely that it’s going to be a rough ride, and the best I believe that Americans can hope for and work towards is that it’s a rougher ride for the the Dems and, for them, a one-way trip.

Tags: | | | | | | | | |

Did You Know?

Did You Know Any Of This?

Did you know that President Trump did all these things – among many other fine and great acts – during his four years in office?

Most likely, unless you’re a serious political wonk with either too much time on your hands or a material need to hunt down such things, you don’t. It’s not like the Democrats’ Lamestream Media ever reported any positive thing that President Trump has done. Doing so wasn’t their job since it didn’t fit the chosen narrative or the Democrats’ most-likely successful pogrom to remove our POTUS from office.

Well now, too late in all likelihood for a positive and peaceful resolution, you know. What you do with that knowledge is a matter for your own conscience.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |

Surrender My Guns?

Surrender My Guns? Not while one single Democrat or Likely Democrat still lives and walks free
Surrender My Guns?

Exactly! The primary reason for the Second Amendment has always been so that we, the People could forcibly remove and enact reprisals upon any politician who acted in such a heinous manner as to shock the conscience of right-thinking Americans.

And lets face it; with Democrats already wanting para-birth abortions and the subsequent extermination of any babies that survive such atrocities, what would they feel safe doing if we were disarmed?

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | |

Ocasio-Cortez’s Threats

Ocasio-Cortez All Angry And Shit

Newbie Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is not a shy and retiring flower; nor is she prone to the basic humility expected of a freshman politician. No, she’s just another nasty Chola whose prone to threatening people.

First, it was Donald Trump Jr. being threatened by Ocasio-Cortez, and now it the CEO’s of Microsoft, Facebook, and Google receiving threats.

And, unlike the thoughtless threat against Donald Trump Jr., these threats are ideologically based and, hence, are more serious. Even more serious since they’re a direct attack on basic rights that are both constitutionally enumerated and set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Dear Mr. Nadella, Mr. Zuckerberg and Mr. Pichai,

We are writing to you today in light of the important role that your companies play as we prepare to take comprehensive action on climate Change. As Members of the House of Representatives, we have already begun our individual, committee, and caucus efforts to make this issue a top priority in the 116th Congress. That is why we were deeply disappointed to see that your companies were high-level sponsors of a conference this month in Washington D.C., known as LibertyCon, that included a session denying established science on climate change.

The past commitments of your companies to address climate change have been well documented. We are encouraged that each of you have pledged to reduce your carbon footprint and have committed other efforts like pursuing renewable energy. We need more of this commitment from corporate America. Disappointingly, though, the example you have set promoting sustainability and evidence-based science is compromised by your implicit support of the session organized at LibertyCon.

We understand that sponsorship of an event or conference is a common occurrence and that these sponsorships do not automatically indicate that the company endorses the variety of political viewpoints that may be presented at these events. However, given the magnitude and urgency of the climate crisis that we are now facing, we find it imperative to ensure that the Climate-related Views espoused at LibertyCon do not reflect the values of your companies going forward.

As you are well aware, the spreading of misinformation can be dangerous to our society. Today’s coordinated campaign to deny climate change, or to put a positive spin on its effects, is not unlike that of the tobacco companies which once sought to discredit their product’s link to cancer. Their propaganda kept the nation from addressing a public health crisis for years, leading to many preventable deaths. We cannot afford to make the same mistake again with Climate change. We must be resolute against granting this campaign any credibility, whether intentional or otherwise.

We look forward to hearing from you in the hope that we can continue to count on you as allies in the fight for a more sustainable future.

Now think about that. Ocasio-Cortez is “concerned ” that the three big tech firms were among the sponsors of an event that included among many other Libertarian and Libertarian-leaning sessions, one that spoke against the AGW position that she believes in. She concerned enough to write to the CEOs of those companies in order to make sure that they won’t do that again.

Essentially, the puta said to them, “Those are some nice stock prices you’ve got there. It’d be a shame if we subpoenaed you and something happened to it.” And she made sure to have Rep. Pingree involved to lend muscle to her implied threat of the loss of 10s of billions of dollars.

That, my fellow Americans, is the beginnings of tyranny. When a worthless politician is comfortable with threatening corporate leaders if they don’t make sure to never again lend support to any event or gathering that might include something that the politician doesn’t like, liberty and America are already moribund.

And, nor is this completely unfounded hyperbole or hysterics on my part. Ocasio-Cortez has already framed Global Warming as an existential threat that must be fought without limits.

Millennials and people, you know, Gen Z and all these folks that will come after us are looking up and we’re like: ‘The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?

This is our World War II.

Just pause a moment and think about her language and the belief structure it is evidence of. It’s the language of extremism and fanatical belief. And, it is the language that led to World War II; it was just couched in German instead of English. It’s the language used by those who have already accepted any moral cost for the sake of their cause.

Think about this carefully and act accordingly.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |