I fear the giving mankind a dependence on anything for support in age or sickness, besides industry and frugality during youth and health, tends to flatter our natural indolence, to encourage idleness and prodigality, and thereby to promote and increase poverty, the very evil it was intended to cure.
The CDC, both bowing to the reality that COVID-19 vaccines don’t work and striving to maintain their magisterium, have decided to go full-on Humpty Dumpty and decide that words mean just what they choose it to mean – neither more nor less.
The CDC use to defined “Vaccine” as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”, while “Vaccination” was defined as “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Now, however, the CDC defines “Vaccine” as “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases,” and “Vaccination” is now “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.”
What it comes down to is that they were forced to admit that the “preventative” medications that they were touting – and other parts of the government were forcing us to subject ourselves to – didn’t meet the CDC’s own standards for “Vaccines.” But, being what and who they are, their solution was to simply change their – and therefor de facto the government’s – definitions of “Vaccine” and “Vaccination.”
It’s a small change in verbiage. A minor and more honest definition change if one is speaking of anything coronavirus-related. But, it’s a change that opens the doors for massive and tyrannical government overreach.
Think about it. If a vaccine no longer has to provide a reasonably level of immunity to a disease, just some level of protection from it or its effects, what other medications can the government, with its long cultural and legal history of being able to demand people get vaccinated, force us to take?
Mental disease is a horrific thing, both for those that suffer from it and for those that must suffer the afflicted, and certain forms of these derangements have grown in rate of occurrence to epidemic levels.
It goes beyond what public health agencies can deal with along. Each and every one of needs to be on the look out for the mentally ill, lest they become a clear and present danger to themselves and/or others.
Do you know someone suffering from Trump Unacceptance & Resistance Disorder (TURD)? Know the signs, spot the symptoms, and save a life.
Trump Unacceptance & Resistance Disorder (TURD) is a pattern of pathologically dissociative and psychotic behavior, first observed in the late hours of November 8th 2016, and increasing in severity with passing time.
Sufferers of TURD often exhibit extremely pronounced cognitive dissonance, sudden bouts of childlike rage, rioting and uncontrollable crying.
Sufferers of TURD are characterized by a persistent unwillingness to accept that Donald Trump is going to Make America Great Again.
TURD is caused by the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States of America. For many, both in America and worldwide, this was a shocking and unexpected outcome; their preferred news sources having failed to inform them that the alternative candidate was a criminal parasite in such ill health she got chucked into the back of a van like a kidnap victim.
Research is ongoing, but TURD appears to correlate closely with the following environmental and behavioral factors:
Identifying as a Feminist
Currently enrolled in college, and/or possession of a Liberal Arts college degree
Living in a densely populated metropolitan area
Massive student debt
Spotty or non-existent work history
Patients with TURD are very resistant to treatment, and dangerous in large groups. Any possibility of treatment requires that they be separated from their hive-mind support apparatus; they cannot begin the process of accepting reality in the presence of encouragement towards delusion and irrationality. Separation may require the assistance of law enforcement.
If you have a friend or loved one suffering from TURD, urge them to seek treatment and stage interventions or report them to proper authorities if their disease has progressed past the point where they can voluntarily accept treatment. Together we can beat this scourge.
As most people in the US are probably aware, we have a second case of ebola in America. One of the nurses treating Mr. Duncan contracted ebola from him in the course of providing him treatment in the days before his death from this extremely lethal African virus.
In American pop-culture this would be called a Wildfire scenario.
Obama’s CDC, of course, swiftly responded to contain this breach…of faith and trust, if not the deadly contagion itself.
We’re deeply concerned about this new development. I think the fact that we don’t know of a breach in protocol is concerning because clearly there was a breach in protocol. We have the ability to prevent the spread of Ebola by caring safely for patients.
— Dr. Thomas Frieden
Blaming the victim for what is likely her imminent and horrific death is the sort of classy behavior we’ve come to expect from Obama’s appointees, as is Frieden’s rank prevarication.
To appropriate a tag line from Frieden’s boss, let me be clear – If following the CDC’s protocols while treating one single patient with a well-known disease in a state-of-the-art hospital in a major American city is insufficient to prevent healthcare workers from contracting the disease from the lone patient they’re treating, then those protocols are horribly and lethally flawed!
It’s painfully and patently obvious that we do not have the ability to prevent the spread of Ebola by caring safely for patients – at least, not if we merely abide by the CDC’s protocols. Perhaps, however, used Firestone’s protocols for containment and treating ebola, we would have that ability.
Ebola is bad – very, very bad. It is not, however the worst disease plaguing America right now. That seems to the the Lying Disease (Morbum Mendax) and, despite having identified Patient Zero, Morbum Mendax seems to be running rampant in some demographics.
The Obama Regime’s director of the Center for Disease Control (CDC), Dr. Tom Frieden is definitely showing symptoms of the late stages of this contagion. His rant on what is and is not America’s proper response to ebola certainly fits the pathology.
A travel ban is not the right answer. Itâ€™s simply not feasible to build a wall â€“ virtual or real â€“ around a community, city, or country. A travel ban would essentially quarantine the more than 22 million people that make up the combined populations of Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea.
When a wildfire breaks out we don’t fence it off. We go in to extinguish it before one of the random sparks sets off another outbreak somewhere else.
A complete and utter travel ban is probably not the right answer in the long run but many nations and major airlines had already quarantined the ebola-stricken nations of West Africa until the Unitied Nations, for reasons largely unrelated to- but but blamed up the outbreak, bullied them into promising to lift the quarantine. There is no valid reason why America could institute similar quarantine measures.
You see, despite the lies drooling out of Frieden’s maw, when a wildfire breaks out we do fence it off.Â The first order of containing a wildfire is to cordon it off using firebreaks and, where needed, back burns.
It’s both tone deaf and ironic that Frieden chose to use “wildfire” as analogy since in American pop-culture “wildfire” is a phrase used to denote a containment breach involving a deadly disease.
Nor would comprehensive travel restrictions into and from the ebola zone impact any form or strategized and properly managed disease control and relief efforts since a well-regulated and protected could still be put forth that did not include normal, commercial air traffic.
Then, this is the greatest threat posed by Morbum Mendax. It weakens the nation’s immune system and make us all more vulnerable to other infections such as ebola.
Consider this – Is it possible, given the near utter lack of safety measures or travel adjustments having been made by the Obama Regime in the wake of West Africa’s uncontrolled ebola epidemic, that Obama and his handlers and overseers actually wanted ebola to reach America?
Did Obama Want Ebola In The US
Yes, I know; that sounds like either paranoid hysteria or simple hyperbolic “red meat” thrown to my fellow Americans. It is neither. It is a reasoned question based upon Obama’s loyalties and cultural preconceptions, global realpolitik, and cold, hard technological and economic realities.
Obama’s Loyalties and Preconceptions
Obama has deep connections with and ties to Africa and Black Africans – genetic ties, familial ties, and religious ties. The latter being the result of his 20 years attendance of a Black Liberation Theology “church,” which holds the African Diaspora as a core tenet of faith. The boy is going to do whatever he can to lend aid and comfort to the African people and states suffering from ebola.
Obama was, irrespective of the geographic uncertainties of his birth, largely raised in the US and does seem to have the normal preconception that our science, technology, and initiative can rise to- and overcome any challenge if only we’re motivated to do so. Some of the more deadly errors in ObamaCare are direct evidence of this. However, the boy also believes that America is an inherently and systemically racist, lazy, and selfish, self-centered culture.
Hence, Obama desperately wants to save his brothers and sisters in Africa from ebola and believes that America has or can quickly develop the wherewithal to do so. However, he believes that it would be extremely difficult, perhaps impossible, to motivate America to do so so long as ebola is confined to Africa.
Global Realpolitik and Techno-Economic Realities
This particular strain of ebola spreads more effectively because it’s slower to show symptoms and slower to immobilize and then kill than previous strains.Â Barring a total quarantine of the continent of Africa, which is a functional impossibility, we’re unlikely to contain it unless we can actually fight it on the ground as it were.
The only medicines that we have to actually treat ebola are experimental, expensive, and require significant technological support. They’re not suitable for transport to- or use in the ebola-ridden regions of Africa, though they are suited for use in the US.
Also, there’s a very significantpolitical and social issues with testing experimental medicines on Blacks, especially poor, African Black villagers. Face it, there’s already large numbers of Blacktivists and Black radicals claiming that America developed ebola to eliminate or cull and contain Blacks in Africa.
So we have Obama personally wanting to save the Blacks in Africa from ebola and we have a vested, existential interest in doing so far beyond Obama’s personal feelings and loyalties. We also have the world’s most largest and advanced medical industry and experimental versions of both curatives and vaccines. Yet for a variety of reasons we cannot or will not bring these resources to bear in Africa where ebola is rampant.
Given all of the above, I do not think it is unreasonable for anyone to question whether Obama might have wanted and decided against taking comprehensive measures to prevent one or more small, presumed to be containable, ebola “outbreaks” in America.