Unchallenging Challenge

President Donald J. TrumpYesterday, President Trump announced that he plans to re-examine federal requirements that regulate the fuel efficiency of new cars and trucks. The Lamestream Enemedia instantly characterized it as the President’s moving forcefully against Obama-era environmental rules – because, of course, hysteria is their sole stock and trade and they know that the Warmists will go even further insane if properly goaded.

Vastly unsurprisingly, the truth of the matter is different than the MSM’s spin upon it. President Trump’s decision to re-evaluate Obama’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) emissions targets is a rather unchallenging challenge to the supposed centerpiece of Obama’s strategy to combat global warming. While it’s true that Obama’s EPA had promulgated regulations for cars and trucks that required auto manufacturers to reach a fleet-wide average of 54.5 mpg by 2025, it is also true that this rule was supposed to be reviewed in 2018 – but, in January – just seven days before Obama left office, the boy decided to cancel the review process. All that President Trump has promised to do is to reinstate the original, promised review of the CAFE standards that Obama imposed in 2012.

So really, like almost everything President Trump and his new administration has done so far, this is neither reason for Liberals and Progressives to scream, nor cause for Right Wing pundits and talking heads to crow and gloat.

Related Reading:

Hysteria: The disturbing history
How Culture Shapes the Climate Change Debate
Once in a Great City: A Detroit Story
America: The Cookbook
Detroit Resurrected: To Bankruptcy and Back

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

And The Consensus Is…

Climate Consensus - Warmists are bad at mathClimate Consensus – Warmists Are Bad At Math

Of course, to be heartlessly fair, this a breakdown of a large swath of the scientific community. If one limited the polling to only “Climatologists,” the consensus of belief-in-detail in Anthropogenic Climate Change with CO2 emissions as the sole or primary cause is over 95%. Hence, most of the queried scientists aren’t properly certified to have or espouse an opinion, not being “Climatologists.”

Yet, to once again be heartlessly fair, Climatology is nothing be a degree in Geology with a handful of extra credit hours attached to it is a degree that was created by the Warmists themselves a decade or so ago. As it teaches the revealed truth of Global Warming as a postulate and scientific truth, of course those degree holders are in orthodox consensus; they wouldn’t be able to be published otherwise and would perish. Hence, their magisterium is invalid and unfounded upon anything but fiat.

Eppure Si Raffredda

Yeah, the Warmists are quite bad at math…and Economics, Political Science, and History – and obviously have zero understanding of even the basics of Chaos Theory. They are, however, quite good at Theater Arts and fairly good at creative Theology and Divinity.

Related Reading:

Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Society: The Basics (13th Edition)
National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Mushrooms (National Audubon Society Field Guides)
Resident Evil (Prima's Official Strategy Guide)
Climate Change: What the Science Tells Us

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Alternative Energy

As I’ve said not too long ago, Liberal and Progressive ecotards, especially the Warmists and climatards of today, should be focusing on better sources of renewable energy than solar and/or wind…such as boobs!

01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
Ass – An Alternative Energy Source

But the issue is, as I recently realized, that such a breast-based energy plan would not be 100% efficient because not everyone is into breasts. Therefor, in order to maximized energy production and diversify the world’s energy portfolio, they should also be researching harnessing the power of women’s asses. 😉

Related Reading:

Environment: The Science Behind the Stories (6th Edition)
The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2017 (The Best American Series ®)
Babe: The Life of Oliver Hardy
Social Movements and Leftist Governments in Latin America: Confrontation or Co-optation?
Leftist Theories of Sport: A CRITIQUE AND RECONSTRUCTION (Sport and Society)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |