And The Consensus Is…

Posted in Politics, Society, The Environment on August 22nd, 2015

Climate Consensus - Warmists are bad at mathClimate Consensus – Warmists Are Bad At Math

Of course, to be heartlessly fair, this a breakdown of a large swath of the scientific community. If one limited the polling to only “Climatologists,” the consensus of belief-in-detail in Anthropogenic Climate Change with CO2 emissions as the sole or primary cause is over 95%. Hence, most of the queried scientists aren’t properly certified to have or espouse an opinion, not being “Climatologists.”

Yet, to once again be heartlessly fair, Climatology is nothing be a degree in Geology with a handful of extra credit hours attached to it is a degree that was created by the Warmists themselves a decade or so ago. As it teaches the revealed truth of Global Warming as a postulate and scientific truth, of course those degree holders are in orthodox consensus; they wouldn’t be able to be published otherwise and would perish. Hence, their magisterium is invalid and unfounded upon anything but fiat.

Eppure Si Raffredda

Yeah, the Warmists are quite bad at math…and Economics, Political Science, and History – and obviously have zero understanding of even the basics of Chaos Theory. They are, however, quite good at Theater Arts and fairly good at creative Theology and Divinity.

Related Reading:

Dark Winter: How the Sun Is Causing a 30-Year Cold Spell
Cincinnati's Crosley Field: The Illustrated History of a Classic Ballpark
Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality
What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions

Bypass US Congress!

Posted in Politics, The Environment on June 5th, 2015

Laurent FabiusThe United Nations, the various global economic manipulators, the grifters and opportunists, and the true believers of the Warmists’ doomsday cult of AGW all have one existential problem in common – how to get their agenda past the stalwarts in the US Congress, who have repeatedly refused to support UN measures that would harm America’s economy and negatively impact American lives, livelihoods, and lifestyles.

It’s quite the problem for them since their movement is both predicated and dependent upon savaging America’s economy and industry.

France’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius – vastly unsurprisingly a Socialist – thinks he has the answer to their problem. He wants to just bypass the US Congress completely.

BONN, Germany (AP) — The global climate agreement being negotiated this year must be worded in such a way that it doesn’t require approval by the U.S. Congress, the French foreign minister said Monday.

Laurent Fabius told African delegates at U.N. climate talks in Bonn that “we know the politics in the U.S. Whether we like it or not, if it comes to the Congress, they will refuse.”

If negotiators follow his plan, that would exclude an international treaty that has legally-binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions – something some countries still insist on but which would have no chance of being ratified by the Republican-controlled Congress.

“We must find a formula which is valuable for everybody and valuable for the U.S. without going to the Congress,” said Fabius, who will host the U.N. climate summit in Paris in December where the new agreement is supposed to be adopted.

In many ways my thoughts on Fabius’ idea is for them to go for it. Without a treaty there is no binding agreement and their only hope for America’s compliance would be for a POTUS who both places an international agenda over American interests and has little to know respect for the Separation of Powers demanded by the Constitution.

True, they have that now in the person of Obama, but the UN’s Climate Summit isn’t until December and the boy will only be in office for a little over a year beyond that. Hence, unless America elects another to that office who doesn’t places an international agenda over American interests and has little to know respect for the Separation of Powers demanded by the Constitution, whatever the UN wants in the absence of a ratified treaty will be moot.

Je vous remercie, Monsieur Fabius. J’aime votre idée.

Related Reading:

Climate Change: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment
Act of Congress: How America's Essential Institution Works, and How It Doesn't
The Global-Warming Deception: How a Secret Elite Plans to Bankrupt America and Steal Your Freedom
Climate Change: The Facts

Climate Qualifications

Posted in Announcements on May 23rd, 2015

The majority of the thinking world believes that Obama is far from qualified to speak upon Climate Change, not that such the Warmists would ever let a lack of qualifications stop them from applauding anyone who agreed with their doomsday cult’s dogma.

Obama's a Weather Man
Just Who Made Obama a Weatherman?

The thing is though that the boy is, in fact, eminently qualified to to speak upon Climate Change, what with Bill Ayers having spent years training Obama in the ways of the Weather Underground. 😆

Besides, who’s better qualified to speak of Global Warming than a world “renowned” Mendacitologist such as Obama?

Related Reading:

Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity
America: Imagine a World without Her
The Death of Liberalism
Plunder and Deceit