Like most creatures who are invested in being “oppressed” and profiteering off of their “Other” status, Karine Jean-Pierre – now most often referred to as KJP – has a well-developed danger sense. It’s just that KJP’s danger sense is very much predicated upon her own issues, biases, and allegiances.
Take as an example the danger KJP found in EWTN White House correspondent Owen Jensen’s quite pertinent question about the White House’s stance on the growing concerns among parents of female athletes who are now being forced to compete against biologically males in their sporting leagues.
“What would the president say to parents out there who have daughters, let’s say in high school, for example, who are worried that their daughter may have to compete against a male, a person born male and they could be a direct and physically athletic competition, and worry about their daughter’s safety,” he continued.
Jean-Pierre, who earlier called the issue “complicated,” then accused the reporter of characterizing transgender athletes as “dangerous.”
“What you’re alluding to is basically saying that transgender kids are dangerous… it sounds like that’s what you’re saying,” she retorted.
Jensen tried to push back against the assertion, interjecting, “I didn’t say that. This is strictly a safety question.”
“Well, you’re saying that their safety is at risk,” Jean-Pierre responded. “You’re laying out a kind of broad example or explanation of what could be potentially happening. That is dangerous. That is a dangerous thing to say that essentially transgender kids are dangerous.
“And so that’s something that I have to call out. That is irresponsible,” she continued. “I had just laid out how complicated this issue is. I had just laid out why it’s complicated, and so anything that you have any additional questions, I refer you to the Department of Education. I’m gonna move on.”— Karine Jean-Pierre v. Owen Jensen
Now, note that Jensen’s question was both timely and very specific. It dealt with parents’ fears that their daughter might face injury if forced to compete against trannies in more physically confrontational sports – [sic]… direct and physically athletic competition. Yet, KJP found danger in just the questioning of whether trannies might present any form of danger in any athletic circumstances. Even a specific and reasonable question is, in what passes for her mind, is dangerous. And that is how her sort, the ever-aggrieved and professionally oppressed, operate. They find danger in anything that is not wholly supportive of what they want.
And KJP Is Stupid
And yeah, KJP’s response wasn’t just telling; it was stupid in the extreme – though, an expected extreme in her case. Jensen’s question was the perfect lead in – it might have even been a hand-out to her – for her to speak about how Biden and Co.’s woke, transphilic changes to Title IX allow colleges to make exceptions to the general government mandate which forces them to allow students to compete as whatever gender they currently claim to be in order to maintain fairness and/or safety of the athletes.
Talk about opportunity lost! But that’s par for the course whenever a hire is made based upon criteria other than competency. 🙄