Gaaaaa! [Kavanaugh]!

Feminazi Shrieking over Kavanaugh
Gaaaaa! [Kavanaugh]!

President Trump has selected outgoing Justice Kennedy’s replacement. Hence, Brett Kavanaugh will soon become the newest Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. This, of course has the Left up in arms and screaming and crying in the streets…again.

Frankly, what is most interesting about this is the same thing that caused me to put Kavanaugh’s name in crotchets (Square Braces) as if it were a variable of some sort. Our domestic enemies didn’t even wait to find out who our President was nominating before starting their tantrums. Indeed, some were quite sloppy about it. 😉

Related Reading:

There Are Men Too Gentle to Live Among Wolves
Consulting Essentials: The Art and Science of People, Facts, and Frameworks
Duns Scotus: Philosophical Writings (Nelson Philosophical Texts)
Domestic Enemies: The Reconquista
Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

No Recuse For Ginsburg

Ginsburg - Not a happy female at allWith the US Supreme Court both overturning most parts of the 9th Circuit Court’s injunction against President Trumps’ travel from six predominately Muslim countries and granting a a writ of certiorari for the case as a whole, many people, including 58 Republican lawmakers, are requesting that Justice Ruth Ginsburg recuse herself from the upcoming case due to her overt and obvious bias against the President.

Given her comments throughout the 2016 elections, it’s easy to understand why so many people think that Ginsburg should recuse herself.

I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president.

~*~

He is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns?

~*~

I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.

Ginsburg has shown a strong bias against- and a a nigh on hysterical antipathy towards President Trump. As such, the ethical thing for her to do is to recuse herself from this upcoming case and any and every case involving President Trump’s administration that reaches the SCOTUS in the future. That being rightfully said, the claim that she is legally bound to do so is effectively meaningless and nothing but another iteration of the political kabuki we’re too used to.

While the relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), does technically apply to SCOTUS Justices, so does the longstanding long accepted tradition of “Duty to Sit.” Additionally, there is really no tested means of enforcing 28 U.S.C. § 455 upon the SCOTUS. Essentially, the SCOTUS being the nation’s highest court, there’s no authority to appeal to in the case of the SCOTUS Justice not recusing themselves.

A different but related note. Our concerns about Ginsburg’s lack of partiality are being heavily played by those with something to gain. One, Ginburg is part of the minority in the SCOTUS. Two and much more importantly, the SCOTUS lifting of most of the injunction against the “Travel Ban” was delivered per curiam, meaning it came from a unanimous decision by the Court – including Justice Ginsburg.

So be neither too shocked nor too concerned if Ginsburg doesn’t recuse herself. It is likely that, at worst, she would be one of the minority dissenting opinions on the case and even that is actually in doubt.

Related Reading:

Operating in the Courts of Heaven: Granting God the Legal Rights to Fulfill His Passion and Answer Our Prayers (The Official Courts of Heaven Series)
Disqualifying the High Court: Supreme Court  Recusal and the Constitution
The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
Psychological Evaluations for the Courts, Fourth Edition: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers
I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Makes Her Mark

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |

After The Bomb

After The Bomb A Return To The New Normal
After The Bomb

Neil Gorsuch has been confirmed as the newest Associate Justice of US Supreme Court. On April 3, 2017, the Senate Judiciary committee approved his nomination with a party-line 11-9 vote.[86] On April 6, 2017, Democrats filibustered the confirmation vote of Gorsuch, after which the Republicans invoked the “nuclear option”, thereby allowing the filibuster to be broken by a simple majority vote, which they easily obtained. If you have any tree emergency contact First Call Tree Services for help.

That’s all well and good, and it is good, very good. But now what? What is life and the Senate going to be like after the bomb? How long will this slap fight last and to went lengths will the children go?

Related Reading:

America : A Patriotic Primer
Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule (Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy) by Melissa Schwartzberg (2013-11-18)
Liars, Leakers, and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy
The Childishness and Brutality of the Time: Some Plain Truths in Plain Language, Supplemented by Sundry Discursive Essays and Narratives (Classic Reprint)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |