SOPA So What?

Posted in Politics, Technology on January 18th, 2012

Screaming in ignorance about SOPAThere’s a lot of whinging, whining, ranting, and raving over SOPA and PIPA. My guess is that very, very few – perhaps as low as 1% – of the people engaging in these histrionics have bothered to read either bill.

That fundamental, self-imposed ignorance, of course,  never seems to stop these cretins from yammering about things about which they know nothing or next to nothing.

Most hilarious reaction is the SOPA Strike or Blackout protest going on today (January 18, 2012).  Well over 99% of the sites choosing to “go dark” are so inconsequential that their permanent loss would go utterly unnoticed by the internet public at large.

NOTE: This blog would also most definitely fall into that 99%, as would virtually all personal websites. I have some comforting illusions but this blog’s importance isn’t one of them.

On the slim chance that you, my dear reader, wish to be one of the 1% who isn’t bleating in ignorance born rage, links to the full text of both SOPA and PIPA can be found below:

Texts of SOPA & PIPA

  • Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) [H. R. 3261]
  • Protect IP Act (PIPA) [S. 968]

At least after reading the bills in question one can, if one still has an issue with one or both of them, have complaints and arguments based upon actual verifiable facts as opposed to the drivel certain agendists spoon feed their drones. And it’s not inconceivable that you would still take issue with SOPA and PIPA; like all laws, there’s room for argument over the details – especially over the various amendments and riders that are always added to bills in Congress.

Read the rest of this entry »

Related Reading:

Implementing Cisco IP Routing (ROUTE) Foundation Learning Guide: Foundation learning for the ROUTE 642-902 Exam (Foundation Learning Guides)
Copyright in A Global Information Economy 3e
Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Casebook (Cyber Law Series)
Sopa de pollo para el alma: relatos que conmueven el corazón y ponen fuego en el espíritu
The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom

Obstructionist!

Posted in Politics on January 15th, 2012

Obama doesn’t like it when things get in the way of his grand reelection scheme. The boy has little patience for anyone or anything that obstructs his goals and he’s more than willing to sidestep around such obstructions.


Obstructionist!

After all, small-minded, self-absorbed, narcissistic boy masquerading as a man or not, Obama is a Liberal who studied constitutional law and their sort only do so in order to learn how to manipulate and suborn it.

After all, Obama is the First Black President and it’s not as if he’s going to complacently allow a document written by a group of rich, old, White slave owners to obstruct his being seen by history as more than a footnote or cautionary tale.

No, Obama doesn’t like it when things get in the way of his grand reelection scheme. The boy has little patience for anyone or anything that obstructs his goals and he’s more than willing to sidestep around such obstructions.

Related Reading:

Laughing at Obama: Volume I
The Path of the Law
The common law
What You Should Know About Politics...But Don't: A Nonpartisan Guide to the Issues
Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress--and a Plan to Stop It
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]

SCOTUS Spanks Holder

Posted in Politics, Religion on January 12th, 2012

Eric Holder - Dangerous Idiot On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 the US Supreme Court delivered a well-deserved spanking to Obama’s boy, Eric Holder. In an unanimous decision the SCOTUS informed the worthless and murderously criminal Holder – and his overseer at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. – that, despite the Obama Regime’s best efforts, the Constitution is still the highest law in the land and it includes the right of religious freedom.

In the case of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC the SCOTUS Justices rendered a blunt 9-0 ruling that the Obama Regime does not have the right or privilege to tell a religious institution who may or may not be in their clergy nor under what terms they onboard or offboard such ministers and/or priests, overruling and reversing the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals’ early decision.

The interest of society in the enforcement of employment discrimination statutes is undoubtedly important. But so too is the interest of religious groups in choosing who will preach their beliefs, teach their faith, and carry out their mission. When a minister who has been fired sues her church alleging that her termination was discriminatory, the First Amendment has struck the balance for us. The church must be free to choose those who will guide it on its way.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.

– Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Writing for the Court

So, for now, the shades of the Founding Fathers are smiling. The Supreme Court unanimously slapped down the Obama Regime’s attempt to violate the 1st Amendment and Americans’ freedom of religion.

Related Reading:

Constitutional Law 101: The TextVook
America
Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, Mafia, and al Qaeda, 2nd Edition
Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, Mafia, and al Qaeda
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]