Conflicting Smoke Signals

Recently, the US Attorney General, Jeff Session declared that he and his DoJ would reverse course on the doctrine set forth under Obama and Holder and restart enforcement of federal drug laws as they pertain to marijuana. This, frankly, leaves me feeling ambivalent since one could say that I’m getting conflicting smoke signals… and neither of them have anything directly to do with either medical or recreational use of cannabis.

To me this is an example of federal overreach resulting in the Constitution being in conflict with itself at this time. I find that the entirety of the federal drug laws, except those that cover importation, exportation, or interstate trafficking, to be violations of the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution. However, the Take Care Clause (Section 3, Clause 5) of Article II of the Constitution requires that the Executive shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. In other words, the Constitution requires the Executive branch to enforce the laws set forth by the Legislative branch unless and until the Judicial branch declares said laws to be null and void.

That conflict is what’s making me ambivalent about this whole thing, not my personal opinions of either medical or recreational use of marijuana.

Related Reading:

Marijuana Grower's Handbook: Your Complete Guide for Medical and Personal Marijuana Cultivation
A Practical Guide to FDA's Food and Drug Law and Regulation, Sixth Edition
Weed the People: The Future of Legal Marijuana in America
The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions: The Official Story of the Abbey Road years 1962-1970
Federalism: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Reference Guides to the United States Constitution)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |