â€œYouâ€™ve gotta respect everyoneâ€™s beliefs.” No, you donâ€™t. Thatâ€™s what gets us in trouble. Look, you have to acknowledge everyoneâ€™s beliefs, and then you have to reserve the right to go: “That is fucking stupid. Are you kidding me?”
Yes, my fine fellows, the legal construct of the crime of rape, as opposed to the objective act of forcible or coercive sexual assault of some type, is gendered – utterly, completely, and unilaterally.
The Crime Of Rape Is Gendered
One is forced to wonder if there is or will become of trend of females taking selfies during their Walk of Shame in order to evidence of their “rape.” 🙄
Then, this sort of misandry and sexism has to be expected. One, Feminists need to broaden the definition of rape in order to maintain their myth of the Patriarchy. Two and more fundamentally, Feminism isn’t in its current form about equality; it’s solely about providing females with special gender-based privileges and freeing them from any consequences of- or responsibility for their own choices.
As we roll our eyes and grimace in preparation for the next wave of race rioting in the Ferguson, MO area, the question oft on the minds of the American people is who will be responsible for that renewal of violent and feral behavior by the ghetto thugs and their enablers.
If There’s More Race Riots In Ferguson, Who’s Responsible?
To many the responsibility for any insurrection and rioting by the Blacks if and when the grand jury fails to indict officer Darren Wilson will be shared by Obama, Holder, Jackson, and Sharpton because of four of these Blacks committed incitement to riot in all ways except the legalistic ones.
This is a serious failing of thought and belief. While these four thug-in-suits bear some measure of culpability for any and all violence that ensues in Missouri, the bulk of the responsibility will be born by the Black hordes and their fellow-travelers. In the end, neither the barely tacit approval of the Obama Regime nor the rabble rousing of the pair of aging Blacktivists, Jackson and Sharpton are causative factors in the Blacks’ behavior.
No, the Blacks in the Ferguson area are the ones who will be responsible for the own bad actions. Placing any inordinate levels of blame upon others for this specific set of bad acts is no different than giving the Blacks the hand out of Blaming American society for their underlying failures that led to this situation in the first place.
If we are to believe Obama and his handlers and overseers, Obama is the most ignorant and sheltered President in America’s history. If we are to believe what his propaganda corps tells us, he’s nigh on completely oblivious to anything that his underlings do.
The O-Blivious POTUS?
Truly, if Americans give Obama the hand-out of credence, he’s better suited to being a member of the Know Nothing Party than of the Democrats. There is, after all, more than passing similarity between the Obama Presidency and that of Millard Fillmore.
As President Fillmore is known only for his bathtub, it seems that Obama may well be best remembered for his television, since the TV seems to be, by his own repeated assertions, the boy’s sole source of information about the actions of his regime.
He Heard About It On the News
Of course, believing what Obama says is a mental disorder that should be included in the next Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) alongside Racial Anxiety Disorder.
While it’s not implausible that Obama is, in effect, a stranger to his own Presidency, it’s much more likely that the boy is knowingly benefiting from plausible deniability. Most likely Obama knows far more of the bad behavior of his regime than he’s admitting and what he doesn’t know is due to his and his handlers and overseers having deliberately set things up so that we wouldn’t know the details.
The boy’s carefully crafted aloof and isolated demeanor coupled with his rhetorical tone certainly created a tenor to his would-be reign that fits this model.
One thing, however, must be remembered – in this, as in every other bit of the Narcissist-in-Chief’s tenure in politics, Obama is neither original nor transformative. The boy has merely expanded upon the behaviors of his predecessors, pushing them down the next step along the entropic curve. Maintaining the POTUS’ plausible deniability has been a growing trend in administrations over the last few decades with President Reagan being notable as the first serious and public uptick in it.
The idea that people’s rulers should be served and given leave to rule is ancient. It’s even biblical.
Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.
But what if, as Americans have found in these latter, lesser days, our titular leaders are neither held accountable nor feel in any way that they are so or should even be so? What now? Should we obey them and/or submit ourselves to them and their agendas when it has become clear that they: do not watch for our souls; do not believe that they must give account to either us or the God(s); and do not, in the case of 53% of us, care what is unprofitable for us?
Some would say that we, the People should pray for these would-be rulers of our land.
I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
Others would say that a quiet and peaceable life is not worth the cost in godliness and honesty that must accrue – a black debt upon our souls – by lending even spiritual aid and comfort to those who have reneged upon and defiled the covenant they were sworn to abide by. These too, however, often believe in prayer as the solution, though I find this lacking and vaguely theologically offensive.
Personally, I cannot help but belief that, upon our respective deaths, we shall go before our God(s) for judgement and they will task us sorely for not taking it upon our own heads and hands to deal with these unaccountable ones.
No! We must hold these would-be tyrants accountable for this failures and malicious misdeeds. The only questions of merit are what forms and within what limits, if any at all, our reprisals should take.