There are persons who constantly clamor. They complain of oppression, speculation, and pernicious influence of wealth. They cry out loudly against all banks and corporations, and a means by which small capitalists become united in order to produce important and beneficial results. They carry on mad hostility against all established institutions. They would choke the fountain of industry and dry all streams.
And no, I’m not writing about the actual and quite dangerous mental illness, the abuse-related mental damage, or the borderline paraphilia either suffered or presented by transsexuals. I’m writing about this idiot bint from Berkely, Khiara Bridges’ mad claims that denying that men can get pregnant is committing violence against trans people.
That is true madness and Bridges’ statement make it clear that she presents a clear and present danger to society and should be treated exactly as any other insane person who does so.
Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?
The above was the 12th question in a recent Washington Post-University of Maryland poll. It was a question that 62% of the 1,100 respondents, who were a fairly even mix of Republicans (300), Democrats (399), and Independents (295), answered: “Never Justified.”
And so, if true-born and rightly-raised Americans set back and do nothing, the Grand Experiment that is America shall come to a sad and shuddering end, borne down into the muck and mire of history under the twin weights of greed and obedience.
When 62% of people within our nation’s borders are willing to state that they believe that it is never justified to take violent action against the government, we’re past the point of normalcy or rhetoric as a means of saving Americans. When that many individuals reject the purpose and point of the 2nd Amendment, there’s little to no hope of a good outcome that doesn’t involve force majeur on Americans’ part.
No, in order to save America, patriots culling the 62% from, at a minimum, the electorate, more likely the public sphere in general, and possibly the population itself, is a course of action that must be seriously considered. Obviously, the tree of Liberty is parched and must be watered.
Just checking. I know that a lot of the sorts that vote for Democrats were quick to defend Kathy Griffin when she was holding a mock-up of President Trump’s severed head. And, I know that even more of that sort declaimed Americans’ response to it as being over-the-top, heinous, and Nazi-esque.
So, how about Uncle Joe’s severed head? Still funny? Still worth defending? Or is this another case like #BlackLivesMatter vs. the Capitol Protesters, where the “nature” of the perpetrators and/or victims has to be taken into account and decisions made solely on those criteria?
Confirmation bias is a real thing. The Democrats just have an extreme case of it that presents in a specifically pernicious and destructive manner. Then, they are et alinsane, some of them congenitally, so this is not shocking.