Zimmerman Arrested

George ZimmermanGeorge Zimmerman has been arrested on Second Degree Murder charges for the February 26, 2012 shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, FL.

This story should really be filed under Non-News Of The Day.

The government of Florida, likely under the “instruction” of Obama and Eric Holder, “hired” Angela Corey to do exactly that – arrest, try, convict, and incarcerate George Zimmerman.

It ridiculous to believe otherwise since Corey is Florida’s top dog when it comes to convicting people on homicide charges. She’s currently also overseeing prosecution of 12-year-old Cristian Fernandez as an adult on charges of homicide and aggravated child abuse.

What happens now is just the steady, slow beat of the drum that ends up with Mr. Zimmerman behind bars where the Black inmate population can do the government’s “work” for them. It will start with the travesty of the Grand Jury indictment – which Corey is not allowing to set the charges – and proceed to a lengthy case that will exhaust Zimmerman’s finances and force him into a plea bargain.

Then sometime shortly after it is proven that Zimmerman has no funds left for his defense Holder’s federal hate crime investigation will “find” that they have enough evidence to charge Zimmerman under federal hate crime statutes and have his sentence expanded.

From this point on in the Zimmerman case the only news will be what special instructions the judge overseeing the case is told to give the jury in order to reach the “right” verdict.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

Safely Offensive

The Risen Zombie Jesus - Blood and Brains For The Lord Christ
Blood and Brains For The Zombie Lord Jesus

The image above is likely to be quite offensive to Christians. Depicting their God and His Resurrection in the context of a zombie apocalypse is quite disrespectful, offensive, and insulting to Christians. By and large though, it’s safely offensive; neither the law nor individual Christians will attempt to do me harm over it.

Of course this would not be the case if I chose to post images mocking Allah, Muhammad, and/or Islam. Then I would be open to societal reprisals and possibly murderous assault by the Muslims. In some areas of the Civilized World I could even be brought up on criminal charges.

Art vs. Hate Crime - Oikophobia, Islamic Terrorism, and Christophobia combined in Evil
One Is Art, One Is a Hate Crime?

The United Nations, long, deeply, and irredeemably contaminated by the vicious, subhuman Muslims, has repeatedly tried to expand this special protection across the globe.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Hate Crime In Seattle

Race Card If five Whites stole something from a pregnant Black girl and then brutally assaulted her when she tried to recover her property it would be headline news, condemned as a Hate Crime, and we’d have animals like Al Sharpton jabbering all over everything and trying its best to stage more riots.

When the races are reversed, however, and its five nappy and nasty Negresses viciously and brutally attacking a pregnant White girl the incident is barely mentioned and the races of the thugs and victim are not mentioned at all.

Such is sadly yet unsurprisingly the case in the recent Black-on-White assault in Seattle, WA.


Black-On-White Hate Crime, But Who Cares?

And, if you for a moment think that Obama’s boy, Attorney General Eric Holder will have the Department of Justice apply federal hate crimes statutes to these ghetto bitches, you’re delusional.

The New Black Panthers – Eric Holder’s Homies

The American people need to wake up and fully realize that they will get no support from the Mainstream Media and little or no protection from the government or law enforcement. In point of sad and treasonous fact, both the MSM and the government will actively seek to prevent law enforcement from providing that protection.

If you want to maintain a reasonable level of safety for yourself and your loved ones, you’re going to have to be willing to provide it yourself by whatever means you can manage and that your conscience calls for – and always remember that it is far better to be proactive rather than reactive, especially in a threat situation.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. 😉

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | |

Not A Hate Crime?

I’m utterly against Hate Crimes legislation in the first place but, if we’re to be forced to endure the evil of criminalizing thought and motive in addition to action, the standard and the law should be enforced fairly and equally, irrespective of the minority status of the perpetrators and the victims. Sadly but quite expectedly, the people who created these “thought crime” laws had no such equality in mind when they did so and enforcement of these laws is very unidirectional.

Recently a woman living in East Austin, TX was awakened by a brick being thrown through her 4 year-old son’s bedroom window. Attached to the brick was a note reading, “Keep Eastside Black. Keep Eastside Strong.”

Austin Police say that the incident doesn’t fall under the hate crime category, which is a classification of a charge but not a charge itself. The excuse is that the the note attached to the brick didn’t include hate speech.

The truth, after the apologetics and dissembling are removed, is that the incident won’t be allowed to fall under the hate crime category because the women in question, Barbara Frische, and her young son are White.

Detail’s via The Austin American-Statesman:

Early Friday morning, Barbara Frische said she woke up to the sound of glass breaking inside her East Austin home.

She called police but didn’t learn what had shattered the double-paned window in her 4-year-old son’s room until after police arrived. Officers showed her a brick with a note attached: “Keep Eastside Black. Keep Eastside Strong.”

“It’s the first time anything like this has ever happened to me,” said Frische, who is white. She has lived in her house on 13th Street for about 10 years.

The incident doesn’t fall under the hate crime category, which is a classification of a charge but not a charge itself, said Austin police Sgt. Richard Stresing. He said the charge probably would be criminal mischief and deadly conduct, both misdemeanors.

Crimes based on race, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability or gender are flagged as hate crimes, Stresing said, so they can be referred to the Department of Justice. The note attached to the brick didn’t include hate speech, he said.

Frische was featured in a Statesman Watch article in May in which she lobbied for action to be taken on a charred house that neighbors said had been a gathering place for drug dealers, prostitutes and squatters.

Frische said she received no negative feedback from area residents after the article ran and said she does not think this incident is connected to the article.

Nelson Linder, president of the Austin chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said incidents such as the one that happened to Frische are rare.

“Throwing a brick into somebody’s home, that’s a crime,” Linder said. “It’s a criminal act, and that’s how it should be addressed.”

Linder said this incident is linked to an undercurrent of racism that city leaders have yet to address in East Austin.

Even Nelson Linder, president of the Austin chapter of the NAACP, amid his apologetics admits that the crime is linked to an undercurrent of racism in East Austin. Yet the law will not address it as such.

If Barbara Frische and her son were Black or Hispanic and living in a White neighborhood in western Austin such an incident would certainly be treated as a hate crime because a note reading, “Keep Westside White. Keep Westside Strong,” would definitely be classed as hate speech – even if it’d been taped to her front door instead of hurled through her son’s bedroom window!

But, of course, hate crimes laws were never meant to be enforced evenly. The people who championed them are primarily minorities and White ethno-guiltists who operate under a particularly self-serving (mis)definition of racism. In their minds only Whites can commit hate crimes based on race because only Whites can be racist.

If this wasn’t a hate crime then neither was anytime the Klan burned a cross in some Black’s front yard.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

Hunting Down Queers

What would happen if someone gathered together a list of queers and those who support faggotry in America and posted their personal information on the internet? Would various criminal charges – including federal “Hate Crimes” charges, and lawsuits be filed? Would there be huge amounts of outcry from coast to coast? Would whoever did so be accused of hunting down queers? You damn well better believe it.

If someone gathered together the names, addresses and signatures of tens of thousands of queers and those who support the legislated acceptance of their chosen lifestyle and made such information public the storm of litigation and outrage such an act would raise would be overwhelming. But apparently it’s perfectly OK for faggots to do that very thing to Americans who do not vote in favor of pro-queer legislation or who initiate legislation that queers don’t like.

A group of queers calling themselves KnowThyNeighbor.org didn’t like the fact that Americans in Arkansas initiated and got approved a 2008 ballot resolution – the Unmarried Couple Adoption Ban (Act 1) – that made it illegal for any individuals – irrespective of sexual preferences – cohabiting outside of a valid marriage to adopt or provide foster care to minors.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS:

Section 1: Adoption and foster care of minors.

(a) A minor may not be adopted or placed in a foster home if the individual seeking to adopt or to serve as a foster parent is cohabiting with a sexual partner outside of a marriage which is valid under the constitution and laws of this state.

(b) The prohibition of this section applies equally to cohabiting opposite-sex and same-sex individuals.

Section 2: Guardianship of minors.
This act will not affect the guardianship of minors.

Section 3: Definition.
As used in this act, “minor” means an individual under the age of eighteen (18) years.

Section 4: Public policy.
The public policy of the state is to favor marriage, as defined by the constitution and laws of this state, over unmarried cohabitation with regard to adoption and foster care.

Section 5: Finding and declaration.
The people of Arkansas find and declare that it is in the best interest of children in need of adoption or foster care to be reared in homes in which adoptive or foster parents are not cohabiting outside of marriage.

Section 6: Regulations:
The Director of the Department of Human Services, or the successor agency or agencies responsible for adoption and foster care, shall promulgate regulations consistent with this act.

Section 7: Prospective application and effective date.
This act applies prospectively beginning on January 1, 2009.

So the very angry faggots at KnowThyNeighbor got copies of the original petition that initiated the Arkansas ballot initiative and entered all the information – including reasonable quality scanned images of the Americans’ signatures – of the approximately 83,000 Americans who signed it into a searchable database and posted it on their site.

The only two purposes for such an act are to intimidate Americans into never speaking out against anything that the queers want to do, and to facilitate reprisals against the persons and property of the Americans who exercised their constitutional right to initiate legislation. As we have seen in post Prop 8 California, such reprisals are likely to happen and are likely to include instances of violence against both people and their property.

Suddenly the hype about the “gay agenda” and what queers will do to further it doesn’t seem quite so far-fetched anymore, does it? Maybe the AFA wasn’t as wrong as many of us wanted to believe.

Would anyone care to hazard a guess about what would happen to anyone who made a similar database of the names, addresses, and signatures of the queers and their supporters who signed any of the petitions that started the various Gay Marriage laws? But then hunting down queers is wrong, whereas doing the same to heterosexuals is “activism.”

Tags: | | | | | | | |