Hillary’s Stolen Destiny

One sadly common refrain among America’s domestic enemies is that Hillary Clinton’s destiny was stolen from her, first by Barack Obama and then by Donald Trump. Disturbingly, the Left believed that Hillary was destined to be POTUS. Hence, her repeated defeats were the theft of that ordained outcome.

Hillary's Stolen Destiny
Hillary’s Stolen Destiny?

But what actual destiny of Hillary’s was stolen from her? Perhaps the destiny that was “stolen” from her was her ordained appointment with Death at the hands of an assassin. Perhaps her destiny was to be the fifth US President to be assassinated while in office.

One does have to wonder if that wasn’t the destiny many of them hoped for Hillary. Given her baggage and nefarious history she would have served them better as a martyr than as a POTUS

After all, we Americans who voted against Hillary are a seething, frothing, violent,unwashed, uneducated horde of deplorable, mouth breathing, knuckle dragging, sexist, misogynist, hoplophilic, patriarchal, Nazis – or so those who supported Hillary identify us as being. If that is the case, what other destiny than death could Hillary have had if elected?

And then there’s the #BernieBros and #BernieGirls, who would have had their own very definite and specific reasons to enact lethal reprisals upon Hillary if she had won the 2016 elections…

It could be that Mr. Trump did Hillary a favor by “stealing” her destiny. 😉 Probably not though. Obama survived eight years as POTUS and, despite the much-hyped hysteria that some racist would assassinate him, not a single credible threat ever got anywhere near him despite the ongoing poor service record by the Secret Service.

Related Reading:

Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters
The Talent Delusion: Why Data, Not Intuition, Is the Key to Unlocking Human Potential
Of Mice and Men
The Assassination of Fred Hampton: How the FBI and the Chicago Police Murdered a Black Panther
The Insanity Offense: How America's Failure to Treat the Seriously Mentally Ill Endangers Its Citizens

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Libs’ Pieholes & Shitholes

Firstly, I have my doubts that President Trump called any country, be it Haiti or some African locale a “shithole” since there’s no credible source claiming that he did so. Still, even if the POTUS in a closed-door meeting did describe one or more Third World countries as shitholes, the Liberals and Progressives, the Democrat politicians they support, and the Lamestream Media that they fondle and drool over need to drop the hypocrisy and shut their pie holes about it.

The entirety of their “compassionate” position upon immigration – be it legal, refugee, or illegal – is wholly and solely predicated upon the migrants’ birth nations being shitholes! Elsewise, there’d be less utility in their declaiming that any American who wants to in any way secure our borders and/or place some form of restriction upon the influx of immigrants as cruel, inhumane, heartless, selfish, and – of courseracist.

But Hey! What’s rank hypocrisy to our domestic enemies? President Trump allegedly said something, therefor it’s wrong, evil, and horrifically so. That, if he actually said it, he only put into succinct words what they’ve been tacitly claiming for decades means nothing tho their sort.

Related Reading:

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
Outrage: The Five Reasons Why O. J. Simpson Got Away with Murder
A Nation of Nations: A Great American Immigration Story
Progressive Steps to Syncopation for the Modern Drummer (Ted Reed Publications)
Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Conflicting Smoke Signals

Recently, the US Attorney General, Jeff Session declared that he and his DoJ would reverse course on the doctrine set forth under Obama and Holder and restart enforcement of federal drug laws as they pertain to marijuana. This, frankly, leaves me feeling ambivalent since one could say that I’m getting conflicting smoke signals… and neither of them have anything directly to do with either medical or recreational use of cannabis.

To me this is an example of federal overreach resulting in the Constitution being in conflict with itself at this time. I find that the entirety of the federal drug laws, except those that cover importation, exportation, or interstate trafficking, to be violations of the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution. However, the Take Care Clause (Section 3, Clause 5) of Article II of the Constitution requires that the Executive shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. In other words, the Constitution requires the Executive branch to enforce the laws set forth by the Legislative branch unless and until the Judicial branch declares said laws to be null and void.

That conflict is what’s making me ambivalent about this whole thing, not my personal opinions of either medical or recreational use of marijuana.

Related Reading:

Latino/a Rights and Justice in the United States: Perspectives and Approaches
The Battle of Ole Miss: Civil Rights v. States' Rights (Critical Historical Encounters Series)
The Bill of Rights: A User's Guide
Whistleblowing Rewards for Reporting Fraud Against the Government, Step-By-Step: How to Obtain a Reward by a Former Department of Justice Attorney Who Helped Administer DOJs Reward Program
Wise Woman Herbal for the Childbearing Year

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |