Charting Biden’s VP Pick

Charting Biden's VP Pick
Charting Biden’s VP Pick

With Biden make gender and race the paired primary “qualifications” for being his 2020 running mate, the Lamestream Media’s charting the duskiness of potential picks is actually less bias than just following along with the Gaffemaster’s own promise.

But hey! It’s not as if Biden couldn’t use a Magic Negress to keep him grounded and under control, and a strong, wise “mammy” might just be the best choice – though the Quaker Oats Company and their parent company, PepsiCo would probably disagree.

In any event and no matter which one his handlers pick for him, Biden’s VP choice in the 2020 elections will be the perfect and most perfectly visible token of what the Democrat party is now.

At least we know Biden won’t pick Hillary as his running mate. He may be a bit crazy and more than a little senile, but he does want to survive his possible term as POTUS without “suiciding” or have “an odd accident.” ūüėČ

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

How Did Go So Far Wrong?

Schadenfreude is arguably petty but I’m honest enough with myself to know that I enjoy it. I especially enjoy it when the situation that engenders it is and was so easily predictable, such as the Black protests and proto-riots at the University of Missouri and other campuses where the Blacks have risen up and claimed oppression, victimhood, and a violation of the “Safe Spaces.”

How did this campus political correctness get so far out of hand
How Did This Campus Political Correctness Get So Far Out Of Hand?

After decades of the teachers and administrators of America’s colleges and universities feeding the monkeys on a steady diet of ethnoguiltism, victimology, and manufactured outrage and angst against Whites and especially “White Authority” they really shouldn’t be shocked that the Blacks and the Liberal and Progressive Millennials that have been pandering to- and enabling them turned around and bit those very same hands that fed them.

In a very real sense these schools are reaping exactly what they’ve sown. And, if they have created a climate which brought seeds up out of the ground with vegetation on the end of them looking like something they never dreamed of, that is wholly and solely their own fault.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Ginsburg Is Right

US Supreme Court Justice is rarely right about things, hence why her opinions are based upon perceived or hoped for outcomes rather than the law. She can, however, be right about the fact from time to time. A case in point being her tirade during an interview with the The National Law Journal. She was and is right about this.

“What’s amazing is how things have changed,” Ginsburg said, recalling the landmark 1971 decision of Griggs v. Duke Power Co., in which the Supreme Court unanimously held that employer policies that look neutral on paper can still constitute discrimination if they disproportionately harm minorities in practice. “It was a very influential decision and it was picked up in England. That’s where the court was heading in the ’70s.”

— Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

And, to our nation’s shame, that was exactly where the court was heading in the ’70s. It was heading at a headlong pace towards enabling special race-based privileges for non-Whites and forcing everyone to make race as the overriding factor in all decisions due to ‚Äúdisparate impact.”

NOTE: The singular exception to this is the progressive income tax which has a very disparate impact upon Whites but is never considered be discriminatory or a violation of their civil rights.

What most aside from Blacktivists don’t know is that the employer policy being lambasted in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. was Duke Power’s requirement that employees in more demanding positions had to either have a high school diploma or scores on standardized IQ tests equal to those of the average high school graduate. As Blacks have a long-standing history, which hasn’t changed to this day, of graduating from high school far less often than Whites, this was considered by the Burger Court to be both discriminatory and a violation of Blacks’ civil rights.

And following along with that High Court ruling and creation of the ‚Äúdisparate impact” framework is exactly the path to Hell that America was taking until the Roberts Court finally started to make inroads against this race-based legal framework.

So, as she so often is, Ginsburg has her facts in order but draws the wrong conclusion. Hardly shocking since she’s SCOTUS justice in the first place only due to Affirmative Action.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

A Racial Education

On Monday, June 24, 2013 the SCOTUS by a¬†7-1 vote with Justice Kagan having recused herself, voided the lower appellate court’s ruling upon Fisher v. University of Texas, ruling that schools must prove under strict scrutiny that there are ‚Äúno workable race-neutral alternatives‚ÄĚ to achieve diversity on campus before being able to legally enact race-based admission policies.

Various Liberals and racial activists, while relieved that the SCOTUS handed down only a “modest” ruling and allowed Affirmative Action practices to continue in the college admission systems, are still displeased by the high Court’s ruling because it leaves the door wide open for further lawsuits like Fisher v. University of Texas.¬† They rightly fear that resultant repeated lower court rulings will essentially put an end to minority-centric college admission preferences.

The important thing for Americans to remember in all this is that these Leftists and Minority grievance-mongers have nothing to worry or complain about and only do so because it serves their personal and, in the case of the racial activists, financial agenda to pretend that affirmative action and non-White admission preferences are needed for the sake of diversity. The simple truth, according to the US Census Bureau, is that these racially bias programs are not needed in any way or, at the very least, they can be scaled back in the manner that the SCOTUS seems to intend.

College Enrollment Per Year By Race

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Whites 11,715,000 11,371,000 11,762,000 12,324,000 12,825,000
Blacks 2,299,000 2,304,000 2,474,000 2,481,000 2,889,000
Latinos 1,943,000 1,914,000 2,131,000 2,227,000 2,434,000

Yes, if one looks at the raw enrollment figures, it’s obvious that far more Whites enroll in college every year than either Blacks or Latinos do. These raw numbers are certainly of the sort that racial activists would quote in order to keep Affirmative Action alive in America. They do not, however, take into demographic percentages in America: White (78.1%), Black (13.1%), and Latino (16.7%)

Percentage Of Population Enrolling Per Year By Race

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Whites 4.86% 4.72% 4.88% 5.11% 5.32%
Blacks 5.75% 5.76% 6.19% 6.20% 7.22%
Latinos 3.74% 3.68% 4.10% 4.28% 4.68%

On average over the five years listed 4.98% of Whites, 6.22% of Blacks, and 4.1% of Latinos enrolled in college each year. So, if we are to assume that the White majority is the statistical norm to work from, Blacks are and have been overrepresented  in annual college enrollments and Latinos are somewhat underrepresented. Indeed, as the trends in the tables above show, the over-representation of Blacks in annual college enrollment figures is sharply accelerating.

Given those racial college enrollment figures, it’s pretty obvious that neither Affirmative Action nor those screaming for its continuance are needed in America. That’s the core curriculum of a real racial education in America today.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Not Brown Not Allowed

Black Caucus - Screaming apes flinging pooAmericans must always remember that while clothes may make the man, suits and ties do not change the screaming, jabbering apes of any Black or Latino Caucus into other than what they always were and will continue to be until the Earth is cleansed with their deaths.

Simply look at their demand for “diversity” and their (mis)definition of that word as an example of what they are and will always be because they lack both the will and capacity to change.

In what passes for their minds New Jersey’s Supreme Court must include judges who are Black or Hispanic. Any of Governor Christie’s appointees to the state’s high court who are not Brown are not allowed. White’s are barred and not even Asians are sufficient diversity, despite there being no Asian on the court to-date.

One of the two nominees, Monmouth County Superior Court Judge David Bauman, was born in Japan to a Japanese mother and would be the first Asian American on the high court.

Yet the Legislature’s Black Caucus, the state Latino Action Network, and a broad coalition of more than 50 groups, including teachers’ unions and Planned Parenthood, are opposing Bauman and the other nominee, Robert Hanna, who is white, primarily because they would not make the court more diverse – and specifically, because they’re not African American or Latino.

The chair of Legislative Black Caucus, Sen. Ronald Rice (D-Essex), quite openly jabbered that it would vote to confirm only a Hispanic and a Black for the two vacant seats on the Court – no Whites, no Asians, no way. Yo! Them there be seats for Brown folk, not Whities or them Yellow Devils.

And Brown ain’t Brown unless it’s down with ghetto and barrio. Skin don’t matter much; it’s the hate and envy that matters. No Oreos allowed!

Let’s face sad and uncomfortable facts; Rice and its ilk belong decorating tree limbs or burning in alleys, not fouling a Legislature with their stench and animalistic screaming and shit flinging. We need to purge America of these apes in order to make room for Americans who happen to be of the same races as them.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |