First 100 Days

First 100 Days
The First 100 Days Were Rough

Yep. Looking back on them, the first 100 days of the current Presidency were rough. The various unelected co-Presidents were scrambling hard to prevent anything and everything that the American people voted for from happening.

Not that this should have been unexpected. For too long, we’ve given judges a level of respect, autonomy, and protection that they really never deserved. So, if we want them to “stay in their lane” and stop trying to be both the Judicial and Executive, we’re going to have to teach them that they and their families a very, very “touchable” and subject to the will of the People. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Tags: | | | | | | |

The Process They’re Due

The Process They're Due
The Process They’re Due

Democrats are all up in arms over criminal illegals being deported without “Due Process.” However, it’s quite easily arguable under jurisprudence that no illegal alien is due Due Process when and if the “punishment” is deportation. Deportation is neither, legally speaking, a civil nor a criminal punishment. It is simply removing them from where they’re not entitled to be and returning them to the proper place.

No Punishment, No Due Process

Under 8 U.S. Code ยง 1325, these invaders could be fined up to $250 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined up to $500, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. Both the fines and imprisonment, however, are provided for under Title 18, which is the overarching Crimes and Criminal Procedures statute in US law. That would invoke the constitutional requirement for Due Process. However, simple deportation is arguably an “intervention” that precludes Title 18 completely and, therefore, is not subject to Due Process, it not legally being a civil or criminal proceeding.

So yes! Illegal Aliens should be given the process they’re actually due and not one jot or iota more. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Always Check Your Six!

Always Check Your Six! There's Dems Within The Walls, Especially The Traitors Of The 9th Circuit Court
Always Check Your Six! There’s Dems Within The Walls

When it comes to defending one’s homeland, one should be able to concentrate outward upon the borders and the the threats massed past them. Sadly, however, in these degenerate times you have to always check your six because there’s traitors within the gates ready and willing to throw them wide, destroy you and your homeland’s defenses, and usher the enemy within.

Yes, in these days it’s not just necessary to man and watch the borders. It’s even more important to take action against the traitors, e.g., the judges of the 9th Circuit Court and their families, to ensure the security and integrity of our nation and our people.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Law: A Queer Thing Now

So right now there’s a lot of discussion and spewing of hatred over the SCOTUS’ decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which now demands that all 50 States allow Queers to marry under the law. Most of the hate being spewed is, unsurprisingly, coming from the Liberals and Progressives and is both an orgy of gloating and implied threat of persecution – persecution now more likely after Obergefell.

In all truth, I’m rather ambivalent about this ruling from the SCOTUS. I’ve read the decision and it seems a solid and well-founded piece of law overall, but with one glaring problem – Judicial Tyranny over the States and the unintended negative consequences that bit of overreach may very well engender.

Queer Judicial Tyranny
The Law Seems A Queer Things These Days

While I have exactly zero issues with the idea of queers being able to marry and have always been an opponent and detractor of DOMA I firmly believe that the SCOTUS’ hearing of this case and rendering such a broad opinion is contrary to best interests of the nation and flies directly in face of previous SCOTUS rulings – utterly ignored by Justice Kennedy and the four Liberals on the Court – that unequivocally stated in Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo that all laws pertaining to marriage are the purview of the several States and not the Federal Government.

Insofar as marriage is within temporal control, the States lay on the guiding hand.

“The whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, parent and child, belongs to the laws of the States, and not to the laws of the United States.

Indeed, I’m displeased by Obergefell for exactly the same reason as I was against DOMA. Marriage law has historically been a province of state law in the United States and it should stay as such. While the Supremacy Clause does allow the SCOTUS to do what they’ve done – it’s perfectly valid under Constitutional Law – one should not do something merely because one can or one feels for some person or group of persons.

And yes, this is what Justice Kennedy did. He ignored history and the long-standing weight thereof, previous SCOTUS rulings, and the negative impacts of the legal precedent this sets so as to lend aid and comfort to a group he favors – homosexuals. Remember always that Justice Kennedy is the one who through judicial action effectively legalized sodomy in America with his opinion on Lawrence v. Texas.

So, to all the queers out there – I’m honestly happy for you but I shudder to think of the damage you’ve caused the nation by how you’ve gotten what you felt you deserved.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Any Questions?

A lot of Americans are less than totally pleased that Mitt Romney is the Republican Presidential Nominee, feeling that the choice between Romney and Obama is not really much of a choice at all. Romney is, after all, not fundamentally different from Obama in most meaningful ways.

The resulting apathy among Americans is compounded by the fact that Obama isn’t the great Socialist demagogue that he portrayed himself to be. He is, instead, a weak, petty, and narcissistic, and has no real agenda beyond his own aggrandizement. Additionally, with Conservatives in control of the House and having a strong enough force in the Senate to block the Liberal agenda, the tenant of the White House seems largely immaterial to the more casual observer.

Mitt Oromney
Any Questions As To Why Obama Must Be Defeated?

The similarities between Obama and Romney once again compound the issue. Romney too is weak, petty, and narcissistic, and has no real agenda beyond his own aggrandizement. He has no moral or policy positions and will, as he has always done, flip-flop on one issue after another based upon what he and his handlers feel will serve him best at that moment.

This malaise must be countered firmly and put to rest. Beyond all foreign and domestic policy (non)positions, beyond all legislative attempts that can be altered or blocked by the Americans in Congress, it is imperative that Obama be defeated and removed from office in November, 2012. The threat he poses to America is dire and of a generational nature.

any-questions
Any Questions As To Why Obama Must Be Defeated?

US Supreme Court justices Kennedy, Scalia, and Ginsburg are all expected to retire soon, quite likely within the next four years. Given the nature of the Court this means that whoever is President over the next four years will likely be able to shape the nature of the SCOTUS for a generation!

Are there any questions left as to why Americans must do everything and anything in their power to ensure that Obama is not the to be in a position to do that? Does any American want another Warren Court?!?

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |