Queerish Irony: When all the lies the gays ranted to the world and presumably by and large believed themselves come back around and bite them on their faggot asses.
In this particular, disgusting case it’s their lie that accepting, legitimizing, and normalizing homosexuality and various sexual/gender disorders won’t lead to a similar thing for pedophilia. It was a lie. It was a dangerous and disgusting lie, and a stupid one to boot. This is proven by certain sorts feeling empowered to rant at children that we “can’t” even call them pedophiles and that they’re Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs)
Stop calling them that [Pedophiles]. You’re not allowed to label people like that. Stop it, Diego. We are not going to call them that. We’re going to call them, MAPs. Minor-attracted persons. So don’t judge people just because they want to have sex with a 5-year-old.— Amber Parker
Franklin High School
And this creature, Amber Parker is not the first to use this specific euphemism to describe and normalize pedophiles. Years ago, Dr. Allyn Walker, an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at Old Dominion used and perhaps coined the term Minor Attracted Person(s). It even wrote called A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity, defending them and seeking special protections for them. And then there’s Miranda Galbreath, a licensed sex therapist and counselor with the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, who has taken great pains to explain that the majority of people make “incorrect assumptions” about Minor Attracted Persons and that those assumptions “create harm for an already marginalized population.” Parker is just the first we’ve heard of being so overt about it in our schools in a position of influence and authority over our children.
And there we are, sadly. The LGBTQ+?! activists and their ever-ready-for-perversions enablers have essentially made their lifestyle and sexual choices “acceptable” and protected by both law and #CancelCulture despite being told time and time again that this would lead to similar – and more than likely similarly successful – things and movements for pedophilia in all but it’s most extreme variants. And, they were wrong – rather ironical but not in any way unexpectedly so.
Disgusting as it is to any right-thinking, actual human being, the irony comes from the fact that every argument used by queers to defend their sexual choices apply equally to pedophiles. They’re born that way; you love (lust after) who you love (lust after); If you don’t like it you’re just a Christofascist bigot. All these argument can be and are used by pedophiles and their enablers to defend their sexual choices, and with an equal weight of logic and truth behind the arguments.
And, their trump card of “between consenting adults” doesn’t even work that well, because age of consent laws are just societal constructs and vary greatly by culture/nation, ranging from 11 to 21.
Worse and what will be a growing problem, is that the declining age of puberty means that hebephilia and ephebophilia – both psychological terms and neither, just like homosexuality, considered a mental disorder under the DSM – is going to be both more common and impact younger and younger children. And yes, it will also impact more adults, who will in apparently perfect sanity be attracted to younger people.
Yes, queerish irony indeed! Every argument and a majority of the terms, e.g., marginalized population, are being used by pedophiles and their enablers in exactly the same way that homosexuals and their enablers used them to gain legally mandated protections and privileges. Just. Like. We. Said. They. Would.
Honestly, I’d ask what comes next, legalizing incest. But that shipped sailed a while back.
Tags: #Groomers | America | Degenerates | Degeneration | Democrats | Disease Control | Groomers | Indoctrination | Irony | LGBT | LGBTQ | Liberals | Maps | Minor Attracted People | Pedophiles | Pedophilia | Politics | Progressives | Queer Agenda | Queers | School | Society | Vermin
Normal, right-thinking adults don’t try to introduce sex, sexuality, or sexual identification to young children. Normal, right-thinking adults know that there’s little no age-appropriate “sexual education” for children that young. On the other hand, perverts and predators do exactly that if given the chance to do so. So do sociopolitically motivated sorts who want to create a world more friendly to sexual deviancy and assault, and they’re teaching our kids right now.
And this whole, growing phenomenon of drag queens having a story hours and teaching session with little kids? That’s sick. That’s not in any way OK! Not when the purpose is to introduce sex and sexual identity to very young children. And especially not when drag queens are the most extreme and poorest – quite often false – examples of the trans.
But, of course, the Left – though apparently and, if so, logically, not the queers therein – are all for it and want this sort of thing expanded upon and entrenched in our schools and. failing that, libraries.
The real question, however, before American adults, most especially but not only parents, is what are we going to do about this. What are we going to do to protect the children of our communities from sexual predators and their enablers, but deliberate and merely misguided or uncaring?
To paraphrase Hillary and to turn her words against her sort, if it takes a village to raise a child, then it most certainly takes a village to defend them.
Tags: America | Children | Democrats | LGBTQ | Liberals | Parenting | Pedophiles | Pedophilia | Perverts | Politics | Progressives | School | School System | Sex | Sex Ed | Sexual Deviants | Sexual Predators | Society | Trannies | Transsexuals
Yeah, I agree with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R CO-3). President Trump may be crass and may have, at some times in his past, have made some fairly crude sexual comments, but he’s never been called “Creepy Uncle Donald” or “Donald ‘Bad Hands’ Trump.” So yeah, I too miss those apparently halcyon days when the man installed in the White House didn’t single out six-year-olds and compliment their legs while giving speeches.
Thanks to Netflix’s decision to stream MaÃ¯mouna DoucourÃ©’s “touching,” “explorative,” and “feminist” work, “Cuties,” protecting children from pedophiles and general sexual exploitation has become a Right-Wing thing according to many Democrats and likely Democrats.
Of course, given much their rhetoric, this essentially indicates that protecting children from pedophiles and general sexual exploitation isn’t a Left-Wing thing anymore. But then, that’s not that much of a surprise, given their views on sexual orientation and the fact that Americans very much hate pedophiles.
Or maybe it’s Right-Wing Only now because of President Trump, or rather. the Left’s insane hatred for him and those who voted him into office.
Yeah, it’s a simple, sad fact that, while it’s possible that the Left is still against the sexual exploitation of children, it’s not their priority and, given the choice between protecting kids and railing against President Trump, his administration, and the 10s of millions of his supporters, the kids lose.
The truly sickening part is that many, but by no means all, on the Left will likely turn to supporting pedophilia just because we’re against it and they don’t want to agree with us on anything.
On “Cuties” Itself
I can’t personally judge the film since I haven’t seen it and have no intention of doing so. Frankly, a movie about an 11-year-old French-Senegalese girl rather poorly navigating the onset of puberty as part of a strict Muslim household on the outskirts of Paris has little to nothing for me to identify with or have interest in. And, beyond that, some of it would sicken me.
What I can directly speak to is Netflix’s poster/trailer for “Cuties” – which I’m neither posting nor linking to – being the primary source for triggering the widespread backlash against the film. It really made the film look like “spank bank” material for pedophiles.
Not one of Netflix’s finer marketing moments and something that makes it so that they deserve whatever negative consequences that get since stupid should be painful since pain is the only way to teach the stupid.
DISCLOSURE: Years ago I worked with a Children’s Advocacy/Protection organization that partnered with the FBI and Interpol. I actually put my “InfoSec” skills to use directly hunting down pedophiles online, gathering evidence, and turning them over to the authorities for prosecution.
That was a couple of very hard years which, after a lot of what I saw, seriously colored my view of anything even close to child pornography.