Reflections From a Murky Pond

I combed through hours of Charlie Kirk’s videos and, when set in their full contexts, the vast majority of his positions and statements were not racist in any real way. However, there was one – shown above – and it “proves” Mr. Kirk was, in fact, “racist.”

Charlie Kirk, with that simple statement, denied minorities their victimhood, denied their status as the “oppressed,” denied White Supremacy, and absolutely rejected the myth of Systemic Racism. That is the ultimate heresy under the Democrats’ Woke Theology and flies in the face of the Dems’ dogma and doctrine. Hence, to them, Mr. Kirk was the worst form of racist.

Tags: #Woke | America | Blacks | Critical Race Theory | Democrats | Liberals | Minorities | Oppression | Politics | Progressives | Race Baiting | Race War | Racial Politics | Racism | Victimology | White Supremacy | Woke

This entry was posted on Monday, September 22nd, 2025 at 8:40 am and is filed under Politics, Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Cue the Democrat outrage! Between showing Sydney Sweeney, the text in the image, and my titling this post “White Is Right,” any and all Democrats who actually found this post would be triggered.

There Can Be Only One Right

That is one of the internalized and not particularly consciously accepted planks of those who tend to vote Democrat. There can be only one right; all else must be wrong. When they hear or read something like “White is Right” or just see a beautiful White woman in an advertisement, they perceive it as anyone not White must be wrong or, at the very least, lesser.

They can’t accept, much less understand, that more than one thing can be right. To them, if one is right, all others can’t be.

This is why DEI, which might have been a good-ish thing – perhaps just a more accountable rebranding of affirmative action – so quickly became a racist nightmare. Non-White, non-Straight, non-Something became right, meaning White, Straight, Majority had to be wrong.

And It’s Democrat Economic Policy

This one is right, others wrong idea, or the underlying binary condition – a XOR gate if you will – is also essentially the Democrats’ economic policy. They – and by this, I mean their rank and file, not their wealthy leaders – hate with a black, bleeding passion wealthy people and want to strip them of that wealth because they truly believe that those people being wealthy means they’re poor.

That’s why they started incessantly harping, ranting, and raving about “Income Inequality.” This is in spite of the fact that real wages, i.e., adjusted for the insane inflation rate (55.51%), have increased by 11.9% since 2006, with some traditionally very low-income jobs having a 15%+ overall increase, largely due to the reality check Panicdemic gave employers.

In the modern, post-company town – Disney’s Reedy Creek Improvement District excepted – America, nobody is poor or particularly economically disadvantaged because someone else is wealthy. But that is blasphemy to Democrats and their even more Leftist associates… because only one thing can be good and all others must be bad.

Tags: #Woke | America | Beauty | Blacks | Capitalism | DEI | Democrats | Envy | Grievance-Mongers | Leftards | Leftists | Liberals | Minorities | Politics | Progressives | Race Baiting | Racial Activism | Racial Politics | Socialism | Society | Sydney Sweeney | War On Whites | Whites

This entry was posted on Friday, August 29th, 2025 at 6:30 am and is filed under Politics, Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Race-Baiting is, even at its best, annoying. But I’ve discovered something even more so in my opinion – Race-Clickbaiting. The particular case in point is the headline for an article from Everyday Chirp that showed up in my Microsoft Start page in Edge:

Earrings Ignite Racial Tensions: Woman Told Coworker She Can’t Get Earrings Like Her Because She’s White

Seems all-too-typical and definitely the sort of headline to grab one’s attention because White women are subject to attacks, primarily from non-White females over matters of hairstyle, clothing and accessories related “cultural appropriation.” As a White man who’s somewhat protective of our women – perhaps more so than they deserve these days – it sucked me right in.

But it was just race-clickbaiting. The non-White woman (Amerindian) didn’t tell her White coworker that she couldn’t get earrings like that because she was White. She just tried to put the woman off because the Amerindian tribeswomen who made them don’t sell their work outside the tribe!

Yeah, a whole different thing.

Also, especially in these times, it’s a dangerous practice. I went a read the article; many wouldn’t have done so. But that headline would be in the back of their minds – one more log on the fire, one more nail in the non-Whites’ coffin.

Tags: America | Clickbait | Cultural Appropriation | Minorities | Race Baiting | Race War | Society | War On Whites

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 28th, 2023 at 2:26 pm and is filed under Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

So, the Woke theologians associated with Hollywood are, as is almost always the case, whining and ranting about how racist White people are when they voice their disapproval of Hollywood’s recent lust affair with gratuitous racial recasting. In this case, it’s in response to the nigh overwhelming negative response to their inserting Black and Black-ish (Puerto Rican Trigueño) actors into roles in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

Their imagined antagonists, be they the showrunners or casting agents, are purportedly spoiling and destroying something good, the commenters felt. How? Apparently by casting people of colour.

Featuring Ismael Cruz Córdova as an elf, Sophia Nomvete as a dwarf, Cynthia Addai-Robinson and Nazanin Boniadi as human characters, and Lenny Henry as a harfoot (an ancestor to the hobbits we’ve seen before), among several others, the new streaming series is bringing some of the first actors of colour to Tolkien adaptations—after six live-action films that went without, save for a few extras. In advance footage and within the first few episodes, it was made clear that these are meaningful roles in the ensemble cast.

Beneath assertions of fandom pride and purity seethes a maelstrom of abject racism. The now-deleted YouTube comment barrage is one strand in a much larger web of backlash, diligently stoked by subgroups of fans that seem hell-bent on tanking the series.

— Sakeina Syed

But there is little to no racism inherent in disliking and castigating the improper insertion of race members who don’t match the original work in question. And, the Blacks and their Woke enablers have certainly never refrained from ranting about it, or even a too-White looking actor or actress is cast in their films.

So, on Córdova:

There are no dark-skinned Elves in Tolkien’s world. All Elves are pale complected and tend towards grey eyes and almost all have dark hair. Even the term Moriquendi (Elves of Darkness) only means that they never completed their migration to the Blessed Land and, hence, they never beheld the Light that was before the Sun and Moon. There’s no racial distinction and, hence, not even a shred of excuse for casting Córdova in the role.

But, on Boniadi:

Alright, they cast an Iraqi as native of the Southlands – what will become Mordor – is to my mind lacking in any issue. There’s little to no canon on what they people their looked like and their close enough to places in which the peoples were described as other than European-esque to make just about any casting not an issue.

And, on Nomvete:

Like Elves, their are no dark-skinned Dwarves in Tolkien’s world. They were always described as short, stocky, bearded Caucasians. This is hardly surprising since Tolkien roughly and loosely patterned them off of the Norse Dvergar, much as he patterned the Elves off of the Norse Ljósálfar

And, on Henry:

As much as I am and have been a fan of Lenny Henry, there are, once again, no Black hobbits – and yes, Harfoot are hobbits, just as Stoors and Fallohides were. Now, it is true that Tolkien described Harfoots as being darker skinned than the other “breeds,” it’s really doubtful that he meant any darker than some of the British or Continental ethnic groups with tanner complexions. But hey! Darker skinned is darker skinned, so there’s at least a shred of excuse for this casting choice.

And, Last but Worst, Addai-Robinson:

Yes, I skipped over the casting of Cynthia Addai-Robinson because it is the single most glaring, egregious, and stupid choice Hollywood made in The Rings of Power so far. Casting a Black as the ruler of Númenor is beyond the pale and throws out all of canon and Tolkien’s lore. It is the equivalent of casting a White as T’Challa – especially the T’Challa of the original comics.

All Númenóreans were tall, fair-skinned, dark-haired, and light-eyed. They were also strongly into maintaining racial purity, unless it involved Elves. Indeed, they didn’t mix much or well with the other Men in Middle-Earth for the most part, holding themselves above and apart from the Middle Men aka Men of Twilight. They even briefly deposed their first Mixed-Heritage King, Eldacar. A Black ruler? So very wrong and pure anti-White, woke bullshit.

~*~

Let’s face facts; only the Blacks and their anti-White, Oikophobic, Left-wing, enables and panderers think that racial recasting and inserting non-Whites into properly White roles is a good thing. And, they’re the only ones crying “RACISM!” when normal people complain about this example of “Cultural Appropriation.” The vast majority of us think what Hollywood is doing is grossly wrong, and we’re right to do so.

And, Tolkien’s works are a special case. They are fully and completely grounded in a fusion of Anglo-Saxon, Teutonic, and Norse culture and religion (What Christians would call mythology), which is no surprise since Mr. Tolkien was linguist specializing in Old and Middle English, both derivations in large of Anglo-Saxon, Teutonic, and Norse, albeit with heavy and profligate Latin and Latin-derivative inclusions.

Simply, bluntly, and uncompromisingly put, inserting non-Whites into a White story is at least as wrong as inserting Whites into a non-White story. It’s Cultural Appropriation in fact, though not in nomenclature since the anti-White racists defined that as Whites finding any value in- and adopting any portions or trappings of non-White cultures.

But, the Race-Baiters’ Problems

First Problem:

The first problem the new, #Woke iteration of Hollywood faces is that their preferred People, the Blacks, are only 13-ish% of the US population and not an important factor in the financial market. So, Black-centric cinema is inherently of limited interest and economic value, and will employ only a tiny number of Black actors and actresses. That’s largely why Hollywood went full-on anti-White and effectively required that all productions especially privilege non-Whites over Whites. In the absence of the possibility of equality, they’ve chosen to go for equity instead.

Second & Greater Problem:

The second and greater problem the new, #Woke iteration of Hollywood faces is that their chosen people have no stories to tell, or near enough to none as to make no difference in the marketspace. Through – and let’s be honest about this – essentially no fault of their own, the Blacks are completely divorced from their ancestors’ cultural roots. That means that, especially in quasi-historical and/or fantasy genres, there are few, if any, intrinsically Black roles for them. And, using the current and most obvious example, The Woman King, fraught with issues due to African history being “messy” by Western and Westernized cultural and ethical standards.

~*~

So no! The issue with The Rings Of Power isn’t racism. The issue is Hollywood’s race-baiting and ever more gratuitous racial recasting of White stories. This is nothing but cultural appropriation and subornation for the sake of being #Woke and for ensuring, whether it’s a valid thing or not, that Black theater sorts reach economic parity with Whites in the same field.

Tags: #Woke | Amazon | Blacks | Hollywood | Liberals | Minorities | Progressives | Race Baiting | Race War | Racial Recasting | Society | Tolkien | TV | War On Whites | Woke | Wokeness Theology

This entry was posted on Saturday, October 29th, 2022 at 5:00 am and is filed under Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Certain sorts are complaining that underrepresented minority (URM) – yes, that’s now a term in college circles – students are facing invisible barriers in public colleges which prevent them from getting or completing the degrees that they want. And those invisible barriers are grades. And this, of course, is racist and needs to be addressed.

Let’s start with the fact that minorities are most likely not underrepresented, if enrollment figures have maintained the rates that they had for a long time. A five-year average showed that 4.98% of Whites, 6.22% of Blacks, and 4.1% of Latinos enrolled in college each year. So, that pretty much throws the Underrepresented Minority (URM) into the trash heap where all such lies belong.

But that “invisible barrier” to minority students is hardly invisible at all. It’s in plain sight, like all or most actual scholastic requirements in colleges, especially large public universities. They do gate off popular majors, limiting them out of necessity to those students with the best GPAs in prerequisite courses for those respective majors. These grade requirements conserve the various departments’ limited resources by acting as a winnowing tool, which makes sure that the strongest students enter those majors and lower-performing students are directed to other majors that the universities’ faculties believe they can better handle.

“I got in here,” she [Gonzales] told me this summer, which she spent finishing her degree in a different major. “I did the application. I did the essays. I was accepted. But then there was another admissions process I didn’t even know about. It was like running a race with one leg.”

It’s quite simple really. When competing for resources, those who can show that they will make the best use of those resources will gain them and those that don’t show that won’t get them. If minorities can’t successfully compete – a falsehood, judging by UC Berkely’s graduates demographic figures – it’s neither the universities faults nor their “problem” to solve.

Most certainly, the growing trend of using “holistic” means of judging a major candidates’ worthiness to claim one of the seats in a college/major, is not a means that provides true benefit. It just ends up lowering the bar, but only for certain classes of applicant.

Tags: America | Blacks | College | Diversity | Education | Equity | Latinos | Liberals | Minorities | Progressives | Racism | Society | Universities

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 22nd, 2022 at 5:00 am and is filed under Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.