After The Bomb

After The Bomb A Return To The New Normal
After The Bomb

Neil Gorsuch has been confirmed as the newest Associate Justice of US Supreme Court. On April 3, 2017, the Senate Judiciary committee approved his nomination with a party-line 11-9 vote.[86] On April 6, 2017, Democrats filibustered the confirmation vote of Gorsuch, after which the Republicans invoked the “nuclear option”, thereby allowing the filibuster to be broken by a simple majority vote, which they easily obtained. If you have any tree emergency contact First Call Tree Services for help.

That’s all well and good, and it is good, very good. But now what? What is life and the Senate going to be like after the bomb? How long will this slap fight last and to went lengths will the children go?

Related Reading:

A History of the Republican Party
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Iran's Nuclear Option: Tehran's Quest for the Atom Bomb
The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Torture: Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program
Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

Obama’s Shameful Hissy

Crybaby Obama - That's all he is; a petulent little boy crying because it's not fair that he's judged by his character and actions.America’s Narcissist-in-Chief, Obama the Boy Blunder,  just another shameful, jabbering hissy fit in the White House Rose Garden. The boy got all wound up and petulant over the Senate blocking the “wonderful” expanded background check bill that is seen as a needed precursor for any further steps towards federal confiscation of Americans’ arms.  Obama just couldn’t help getting pissy over yet another of his pet projects being gutted by either the Legislature or the Judiciary.

He also made a brief tirade against the vast majority of Americans who are disgusted by his use of victims and victims’ families as props and/or human shields in his quest to curtail and infringe upon the Second Amendment.

Of course Obama’s against Americans with firearms. He’s afraid that he and his family won’t make to a plane heading to Mauritania before an American exterminates them. 😆

It’s a stupid fear because Americans aren’t quite ready to rise up and take our country back, but Obama is a stupid child poorly playacting act being a man.

Understand that Obama had his little fit because the expanded background check bill, not a truly hideous thing in and of itself, was and is seen as a bellwether for further disarmament measures. Since it’s been blocked by a filibuster and support for it is waning, there’s now no hope seen for Obama’s desire to largely or wholly disarm the citizenry.

On the bright side, no day that starts with Obama jabbering, raving, and whining in a fit of petulance can be all bad.

Related Reading:

Control: Exposing the Truth About Guns
Senate Procedure and Practice
Filibusters and Financiers: The Story of William Walker, and His Associates (Classic Reprint)
Final report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate : together with additional, supplemental, and separate views
The Constitution Of The United States Of America: the constitution of the united states pocket size: the constitution

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |

Stupid, Brave, or Evil?

US Senate Democrats want to significant change the current Senate procedures. They want to streamline the process and curb the ability of the minority party to block pending legislation via use of Senate procedures such as the filibuster.

The immediate, pertinent, and critical question before Americans is whether this desire of the Democrats is stupid, brave, or evil.

As reported by the New York Times:

WASHINGTON Frustrated by regular filibusters and other procedural blockades, Senate Democrats are urging their leadership to negotiate with Republicans to change the rules that govern how the Senate does business.

The Democrats would leave intact the ability of the minority party to filibuster legislation and nominations, meaning that in most cases it would still take 60 votes to get anything done in the Senate. But they want to require senators to be on the floor if they intend to try to debate a bill to death and would make other changes to streamline the Senates operations, including ending the practice of secret holds by a single senator on legislation or nominees.

Republicans are likely to resist, and should no compromise be found, some Democrats are prepared to propose their own package of rules changes on the first day of the session.

This is certainly both interesting and ironic. It’s interesting because the premise that partisanship and use / misuse of Senate has reached the point that it often interferes with the Senate getting anything accomplished and changing the procedures in some fashion may well be needed. It’s ironic because this behavior started with a Democrat Senate minority under President Bush.

But interest and irony don’t address whether the Democrats desires are based upon is stupidity, bravery, or evil.

Stupid?

That the Senate Dems are being childish, shortsighted, and stupid is certainly the easiest answer. Frankly, when dealing with any grouping of people it is almost always wiser to attribute to stupidity what one might otherwise attribute to some other motivation.

There are 23 Senate Democrats 2 Independents who consistently caucus with them up for reelection in 2012 and only 8 Republicans. Simple math combined with the current political climate indicates that the Republicans will win the Senate majority in the 2012 elections. Hence, anything they do to weaken the minority party will certainly come back to haunt them in the near future.

Brave?

There’s also the chance, albeit a slim one, that the Senate Democrats are being brave and putting the needs of the nation before their personal desires. With the odds on bet being that they’ll shortly be the minority party in the Senate it could be an act of courage and statesmanship to curtail what power they will soon be limited to.

It is most certainly a surety that something needs to be done to modify Senate procedures. They’ve reached the point where it is almost impossible to get anything accomplished without a level of “sausage making” that is nothing but legally excused corruption and bribery. If the Democrats in the Senate are actually honest in their goals, this is a rare act of statesmanship, patriotism, and courage.

Evil?

Of course this attempt to change Senate procedures could just be another example of the Democrats’ self-centeredness and evil. If the Democrats are following President Obama’s twisted model of bipartisanship then their claims about seeking to reach out to the Republicans in order to craft sensible changes to the Senate procedures is just a sham.

This could all just be a show played out to trick the American people into thinking that the GOP is nothing more than needlessly obstructive. These Democrats could easily be planning on offering up an unacceptable set of changes, forcing the Republican to block them, and then claiming that those Senate Republicans just want to shutdown the government.

Since some of the Democrats are openly speaking of trying to invoke the untested-to-date “constitutional option” on the opening day of the next Senate session, self-centeredness and evil as motivation for their actions has some evidence to support it.

~*~

I’d truly like to believe that the Senate Democrats are showing a rare occurrence of bravery and statesmanship; I’m more than willing to believe and settle for their actions are based upon shortsightedness and stupidity; history, however, indicates that self-centeredness and outright evil has a very good chance of being what is behind the Democrats’ desire to change the Senate procedures.

It is, however, far too early to make a judgment upon this matter. The American people must watch and wait until we have enough information to make the decision as whether the Senate Democrats are being stupid, brave, or evil.

Related Reading:

The Truth She Knew (The Truth Series Book 1)
Truth (Consequences)
The Truth About Your Future: The Money Guide You Need Now, Later, and Much Later
The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy
James B. Comey: Testimony: Former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Testifies regarding President Donald J. Trump before the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |