The Good And The Bad

The Good And The Bad
The Good And The Bad

As with most things, the SCOTUS’ recent decision that using race as a criteria for college enrollment is unconstitutional has its good and its related though largely irrelevant bad.

The Good

Almost everyone would agree that race should not be a criterion for anything. Well, they would if the race wasn’t Black. But, of course, the entirety of the Left and the “Black Community” does want race to be a criterion… if the race is Black and they get comparatively lowered admission standards. They unashamedly admit that the Blacks can’t meet normative admission standards.

But then, that is the entire premise of Equity! Hence, it’s good that this has been, at least insofar, as college admissions are concerned, finally eradicated by the SCOTUS.

The Bad

The Left and their Black sharecroppers have been ranting how Legacies still get preferential admissions and, while its irrelevant and nothing but a subnormal straw man, they are right in their assertion that Legacies are bad. They suck. They are based upon nothing resembling merit or ability. But they’re also not something that law or the courts can correct for.

Hellfire! I’d like to an end to athletic scholarships too. But that would really set off the Blacks.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Woke Appointee Fail

Woke Appointee Fail - Kato Crews - ignorant but nigger enough
Woke Appointee Fail

It should really come as no surprise to anyone in America when a Woke Appointee displays fundamental incompetence for the position they’ve been put forth for. When not be a Straight White Man is the primary criteria for their appointment, once has to expect that they’re lacking in actual merit. Still though, sometimes the Woke Appointee Fail is more egregious than other. Biden and Co.’s Black appointee to the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado is one of those more flagrant token appointees.

It’s pretty bad when an already sitting judge can’t answer the very basic question of what a Brady motion is when queried by the Senate.

Judge Kato Crews — who was nominated by President Joe Biden for the U.S. District Court of Colorado — failed to answer a question on the Brady motion, a basic legal concept.  

When pressed on the issue by Kennedy, Crews said that the term was “not coming to mind.” But that didn’t stop the judge from giving his best guess. 

“I believe that the Brady case involved something regarding the Second Amendment,” Crews responded. “I have not had an occasion to address that.”

Well, at the boy came up with something that had “Brady” in it. I mean, sure, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 is a far, far cry from the more basic modern legal tenet set forth by the SCOTUS in 1963 via their opinion on the landmark case of Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83).

To be fair though, I adhere to the now racist belief that actually being qualified for the job is much more important than the color of one’s skin or who or what they have sex with.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Democrats’ Police Reform

Democrats' Police Reform
Democrats’ Police Reform Visualized

This is a sadly apt visualization of Democrats’ Police Reform, especially in regards to the endemic intersectionality of Black males and violent crime. In the name of #Equity, this is how Democrats expect law enforcement to treat Black violent offenders. After all, like everything else done under the warbanner of Equity, the only only way to get the results – and the Blacks’ votes – Democrats want it to not enforce laws or standards upon Blacks.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |