Safely Offensive

Posted in Politics, Religion, Society on May 31st, 2011

The Risen Zombie Jesus - Blood and Brains For The Lord Christ
Blood and Brains For The Zombie Lord Jesus

The image above is likely to be quite offensive to Christians. Depicting their God and His Resurrection in the context of a zombie apocalypse is quite disrespectful, offensive, and insulting to Christians. By and large though, it’s safely offensive; neither the law nor individual Christians will attempt to do me harm over it.

Of course this would not be the case if I chose to post images mocking Allah, Muhammad, and/or Islam. Then I would be open to societal reprisals and possibly murderous assault by the Muslims. In some areas of the Civilized World I could even be brought up on criminal charges.

Art vs. Hate Crime - Oikophobia, Islamic Terrorism, and Christophobia combined in Evil
One Is Art, One Is a Hate Crime?

The United Nations, long, deeply, and irredeemably contaminated by the vicious, subhuman Muslims, has repeatedly tried to expand this special protection across the globe.

Read the rest of this entry »

Related Reading:

The Last Jihad (Political Thrillers Series #1)
Society: The Basics (11th Edition)
Christianity and Islam
The World's Religions (Plus)

Hate Crime In Seattle

Posted in Politics, Society on December 17th, 2010

Race Card If five Whites stole something from a pregnant Black girl and then brutally assaulted her when she tried to recover her property it would be headline news, condemned as a Hate Crime, and we’d have animals like Al Sharpton jabbering all over everything and trying its best to stage more riots.

When the races are reversed, however, and its five nappy and nasty Negresses viciously and brutally attacking a pregnant White girl the incident is barely mentioned and the races of the thugs and victim are not mentioned at all.

Such is sadly yet unsurprisingly the case in the recent Black-on-White assault in Seattle, WA.


Black-On-White Hate Crime, But Who Cares?

And, if you for a moment think that Obama’s boy, Attorney General Eric Holder will have the Department of Justice apply federal hate crimes statutes to these ghetto bitches, you’re delusional.

The New Black Panthers – Eric Holder’s Homies

The American people need to wake up and fully realize that they will get no support from the Mainstream Media and little or no protection from the government or law enforcement. In point of sad and treasonous fact, both the MSM and the government will actively seek to prevent law enforcement from providing that protection.

If you want to maintain a reasonable level of safety for yourself and your loved ones, you’re going to have to be willing to provide it yourself by whatever means you can manage and that your conscience calls for – and always remember that it is far better to be proactive rather than reactive, especially in a threat situation.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. ;-)

Related Reading:

Crime Stories
Among the Thugs
Politics For Dummies
Practical politics; or, The liberalism of to-day
Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]

Not A Hate Crime?

Posted in Politics, Society on July 28th, 2009

I’m utterly against Hate Crimes legislation in the first place but, if we’re to be forced to endure the evil of criminalizing thought and motive in addition to action, the standard and the law should be enforced fairly and equally, irrespective of the minority status of the perpetrators and the victims. Sadly but quite expectedly, the people who created these “thought crime” laws had no such equality in mind when they did so and enforcement of these laws is very unidirectional.

Recently a woman living in East Austin, TX was awakened by a brick being thrown through her 4 year-old son’s bedroom window. Attached to the brick was a note reading, “Keep Eastside Black. Keep Eastside Strong.”

Austin Police say that the incident doesn’t fall under the hate crime category, which is a classification of a charge but not a charge itself. The excuse is that the the note attached to the brick didn’t include hate speech.

The truth, after the apologetics and dissembling are removed, is that the incident won’t be allowed to fall under the hate crime category because the women in question, Barbara Frische, and her young son are White.

Detail’s via The Austin American-Statesman:

Early Friday morning, Barbara Frische said she woke up to the sound of glass breaking inside her East Austin home.

She called police but didn’t learn what had shattered the double-paned window in her 4-year-old son’s room until after police arrived. Officers showed her a brick with a note attached: “Keep Eastside Black. Keep Eastside Strong.”

“It’s the first time anything like this has ever happened to me,” said Frische, who is white. She has lived in her house on 13th Street for about 10 years.

The incident doesn’t fall under the hate crime category, which is a classification of a charge but not a charge itself, said Austin police Sgt. Richard Stresing. He said the charge probably would be criminal mischief and deadly conduct, both misdemeanors.

Crimes based on race, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability or gender are flagged as hate crimes, Stresing said, so they can be referred to the Department of Justice. The note attached to the brick didn’t include hate speech, he said.

Frische was featured in a Statesman Watch article in May in which she lobbied for action to be taken on a charred house that neighbors said had been a gathering place for drug dealers, prostitutes and squatters.

Frische said she received no negative feedback from area residents after the article ran and said she does not think this incident is connected to the article.

Nelson Linder, president of the Austin chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said incidents such as the one that happened to Frische are rare.

“Throwing a brick into somebody’s home, that’s a crime,” Linder said. “It’s a criminal act, and that’s how it should be addressed.”

Linder said this incident is linked to an undercurrent of racism that city leaders have yet to address in East Austin.

Even Nelson Linder, president of the Austin chapter of the NAACP, amid his apologetics admits that the crime is linked to an undercurrent of racism in East Austin. Yet the law will not address it as such.

If Barbara Frische and her son were Black or Hispanic and living in a White neighborhood in western Austin such an incident would certainly be treated as a hate crime because a note reading, “Keep Westside White. Keep Westside Strong,” would definitely be classed as hate speech – even if it’d been taped to her front door instead of hurled through her son’s bedroom window!

But, of course, hate crimes laws were never meant to be enforced evenly. The people who championed them are primarily minorities and White ethno-guiltists who operate under a particularly self-serving (mis)definition of racism. In their minds only Whites can commit hate crimes based on race because only Whites can be racist.

If this wasn’t a hate crime then neither was anytime the Klan burned a cross in some Black’s front yard.

Related Reading:

Hispanic Nation: Culture, Politics, and the Constructing of Identity
Whites, Blacks and Racist Democrats
Hate Crime: A Novel of Suspense
Society: The Basics, Books a la Carte Edition (11th Edition)
Crime and Punishment (Dover Thrift Editions)
[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter]