Abortion is the only event that modern liberals think too violent and obscene to portray on TV. This is not because they are squeamish or prudish. It is because if people really knew what abortion looked like, it would destroy their pretense that it is a civilized answer to the problem of what to do about unwanted babies
— Peter Hitchens
Recent Comments
jonolan on Lazy Fat Ugly Cows: “I'm guessing that you didn't make it to the end of the post, specifically the final 3 paragraphs under "Or…” Jan 12, 07:18
John on Lazy Fat Ugly Cows: “On the second page you can almost see the abs of the brown complected lady. How is she fat and…” Jan 11, 15:41
jonolan on Virginia's Dark History: “Personally, I think this particular gun-grabbing exercise will go very messily and result in local law enforcement having serious issues…” Jan 7, 06:45
Tyler, the Portly Politico on Virginia's Dark History: “Great post, jonolan. Northam's views on abortion are similarly reprehensible: [Here] How do you think this gun control measure in…” Jan 5, 08:59
Oh, the sorts running and working at Fascistbook will probably never quite come out and say it, but blocking, jailing, and deplatforming as many American voices as possible is definitely part of their agenda in the lead up to the 2020 elections.
Their latest target has been Black Conservative, Candace Owens. They actually went so far as to authorize special scrutiny of Ms. Owens’ public persona, her ideology, actions, and major news involving her. The policy review team was also instructed to list any and all “Affiliated Hate Entities” of Owens – whatever those are.
To most Americans it’s obvious that Facebook’s bans are the conspiracy. They’ve doubled-down on probably illegally silencing certain sorts of speech and certain sorts of speech only, while letting at least as “dangerous” things go by without censure or censorship. Indeed, they developed the habit of actively defending their preferred narrative by banning dissenting or complaining comments and those that made them.
Most people believe that there is no real way to fight against Facebook’s fascistic censoring of speech and opinion in its platform because Facebook aka Fascistbook is a private, corporate entity. Fortunately and surprisingly, this is NOT legally true and there is case law to back that up.
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946) that when a corporation is, in essence the public square and functions as such, it must abide by the same restrictions as the State insofar as Constitutional law is concerned. And that Facebook is, in fact, operating in that manner is the held opinion of the SCOTUS, as stated in Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. _ (2017).
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate with one another on any subject that might come to mind. With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and listening in the modern public square, and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment rights.
So yes, I do believe that we, the People have to capacity to fight Fascistbook and the other dangerously biased and tyrannical social media corporations that have become entrenched in society to the point of it not being completely ridiculous to think of them as utilities.
jonolan on Lazy Fat Ugly Cows: “I'm guessing that you didn't make it to the end of the post, specifically the final 3 paragraphs under "Or…” Jan 12, 07:18
