Despite what the Dems’ Lamestream Media wants everyone to believe, there’s been very, very little violence perpetrated by #MAGA people. There’s been even less if one excludes semi-defensive violence resulting from protests/counter-protests resulting in the various Dem-aligned ilk foolishly assaulting them. But, what little #MAGA-related violence there has been can be explained aptly and accurately with Branco’s cartoon. The Dems’ essentially “radicalize” certain parts of our community and their media gleefully paints a targeted and biased picture of whatever unrest results.
There can be little to no doubt that Liberal logic is Dhimmi logic when it comes to dealing with Muslims. Then, Liberal logic has always been predicated upon a miscegenate offspring of oikophobia and fear. It is the logic of the Heckler’s Veto crossed with that of the White Man’s Burden.
Liberal Logic – Dhimmitude 101
This is what we consistently hear from the Liberals and Progressives within our borders – that Muslims are a peaceful people … but that any action that we take to protect ourselves from their proven acts of violence and terrorism against us in the name of jihad will cause them to radicalize and become violent. These Liberals and Progressives even go so far as to claim that actually believing and accepting the existence of their jihad is a recruitment tool for the jihadis and terrorists.
For the past several decades the Liberals and their minority tenants have been repeating the same old, tired mantra that states:
When a minority succeeds it’s despite America’s endemic and systemic racism, and when a minority fails it is because of it.
And they’ve had more than their proper share of success with this tactic since, if you repeat a lie often enough – especially if you repeat to children during their formative years – it will eventually be believed.
So, of course, they followed near to the the tenets of their spiritual godfather, the neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky and applied this same mantra to their other agenda items, hoping to have similar or even greater levels of success.
With a very limited repertoire at their disposal, it makes perfect sense for the Liberals to stick with this singular tactic.
This is a classic example of faithful – orthodox even – adherence to Alinsky’s 2nd Rule for radicals seeking to destroy a society:
Never go outside the expertise of your people – When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat….
Naturally, when the Heirophant of Global Warming, Al Gore started his doomsday cult these Liberals realized it was a good vehicle for promulgating their neo-Socialist, ethno-guiltist agenda and applied the same mantra to it:
Any cooling trend, no matter how long or general, is despite Anthropogenic Global Warming, and any warming trend, no matter how brief or localized, is because of it.
And they failed! The loyal citizens of the Civilized World, Americans especially, rejected them and the Warmists’ cult of AGW largely because these Liberals used this same tired mantra to argue the point.
We had in the intervening years realized the falsehood of their earlier claims about race and racism and weren’t going to believe those same false arguments again just because the nouns had been shifted around to fit a new methodology of achieving the Liberal agenda.
These Liberals, obviously not quite as literate and educated as they want us to believe, forgot Alinsky’s 7th Rule for Radicals:
A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag – Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time….
It was an Alinskyian Failure of global proportions and one that each and every citizen of the Civilized World should be thankful for. Which is not to say that we shouldn’t stay alert for a resurgence of this cult and be ready to crush it again by and and all means at our disposal.
Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. 😉
Tags: AGW | Climate Change | Environmental Justice | Global Warming | Leftists | Liberals | Politics | Progressives | Radicals | Saul Alinsky | Social Engineering | Social Justice | Socialism | Society
Does it make anyone but myself find more than a bit disturbing and sickening that President Obama’s front-group, Organizing for America is not only having its membership swear Oaths Of Loyalty to Obama, but also swearing to spread the “good word” of Obama by going door-to-door, evangelizing President Obama’s manifesto?
I wonder, will they, like the Mormons and the Jehovah Witnesses, bring literature with them? If so, what will it be, one of Obama’s – not one, but two – autobiographies, Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, or possibly Marx’s and Engels’, Communist Manifesto?
I also wonder if this will be purely a grass-roots effort, or if ACORN, CAIR, MEChA, and other similar strong-arm groups will be involved, either openly or covertly.
While I’m sure there are those will who vituperously disagree with with me, I find this Pledge Prject of Organizing for America (formally Obama for America) to be both disturbingly cult-like and counter to many of the core principles of American society. We do not worship our elected officials and we do not swear oaths of loyalty to them; we swear oaths of loyalty only to America.
I do have one lingering question though; does this abominnation come from Obama or from those who have made him their Chosen One? Obama was a community organizer ala ACORN with all that it implies and was tutored in politics and manipulating the masses by the domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, so it’s quite possible – but it’s far from a certainty from what I’ve seen and read.
This vile and disturbing behavior could have arisen from his followers and not from Obama himself. I’ve often wondered if Obama created the phenomenom of his following, or if he just capitalized upon their blind faith and quasi-religious fervor. If the latter, I feel sorry for the President if they come to feel that he’s failed them.
America is about to pass through a crossroads. With Barack Obama about to take office as President of The United States of America a great deal will be subjected to change in our nation. Most of us aren’t truly cognizant of what those changes are expected to be or encompass.
In an attempt to give people the opportunity to educate themselves on what to expect and/or fear from the upcoming Liberal administration I’ve compiled three resources that I believe can provide a basis for understanding what Obama and his administration plan on doing.
Rahm Emanuel is Obama’s White House Chief of Staff and Bruce Reed President of the Democratic Leadership Council. Together they wrote The Plan: Big Ideas for America.
Their plan includes: Universal Citizen Service, Universal College Access, and Universal Children’s Health Care.
By combining Emanuel’s Chicago style political streetfighting realism with Reed’s neo-Socialist Utopian agenda, The Plan is a blueprint for an entirely new America, one based on strong federal control and a nationwide, state-run agenda.
Yes, another book by Barack Obama. In Change We Can Believe In: Barack Obama’s Plan to Renew America’s Promise now President-elect – and soon to be President – Obama provides some more details to the airy promises he made during his campaign.
There’s a great deal of overlap between Obama’s “Change” and Emanuel’s “Plan”. It seems that The Plan is the framework that Obama fleshed out to create his plan for his new America.
Assuming that Obama sticks somewhat close to his stated goals, this book will be a valuable source of information about what American’s should expect over the next few years.
Alinsky’s radical teachings influenced Barack Obama in his early career as a community organizer on the far South Side of Chicago. Rules for Radicals is Alinsky’s manifesto for overthrowing the American governmental and societal structure so as to replace it with a neo-Socialist state.
This book was essentially the blueprint for the Obama presidential campaign.
The tactics for revolution that Alinsky detailed are very applicable to Obama’s view of the desired future of America. American’s should expect these stratagems to be used by Obama’s administration as they move forward with their agenda.
Whether you’re a Conservative, Moderate, or Liberal these three books are important reading. The Plan, Change We Can Believe In, and Rules for Radicals outline the threats posed and/or promises offered by the incoming administration and some of the tactics they will probably use to implement them.
Read, learn, be studiously aware! Whether you loath and fear Obama or see him as the hope for a brighter American future, learn as much of the truth as you can and manage your own expectations.