Reflections From a Murky Pond

Given the vermin’s decompensating and saying the Islamist parts out loud, this is a fair appraisal of Mamdani’s views on the 9/11 Muslim attack on the WTC and Pentagon. Let’s face facts, if he didn’t celebrate the attack and the 2,976 deaths it caused, it’s because he was inconvenienced by it.

Oh yeah, and Mamdani’s supposed aunt, whom he proclaimed was one of the real victims? One, she’s not his aunt; she’s his father’s cousin. Two, she was not and is not a Hijabi. And three, she was living in Tanzania at that time.

And, to his fantasy of anti-Muslim attacks due to 9/11? We exterminated 3 of them: Waquar Hassan, Abdo Ali Ahmed, and Ali Almansoop. Even the very, very biased reporting on “hate crimes” against Muslims by CAIR only reported 1717 incidents of “backlash discrimination” against Muslims from September 11 through February 2002. And that number was only reached by them, including things ranging from verbal taunts to employment discrimination to airport profiling, along with actual acts or threats of any level of violence.

But Mamdani is a Shia Muslim seeking power over people. Lying to appropriate oppression is just part of his faith and culture.

Tags: 9/11 | America | Democrats | Islamists | Liberals | Lies | Muslims | NYC | Politics | Progressives | Ragheads | Vermin | Zohran Mamdani

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 30th, 2025 at 11:31 am and is filed under Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

This is the greatest irony and unself-aware shitshow of our current times. All the “king,” “Dictator,” “Authoritarian,” “Fascist,” “Nazi,” Threat to Democracy” crap drooling out of the maws of Democrat politicians, and the “Mostly Peaceful” protests and such that are happening are only happening because they’re lying through their teeth… or are too mentally unstable to be allowed to participate in the political process.

If President Trump decided he was King, Dictator, or otherwise the sole authority over America, Democrat politicians, especially Schumer and Jeffries, would already be dead or imprisoned somewhere. A number of overbearing judges certainly would be.

Oh, and if even 3% (2.39 million) of the 77+ million Americans who elected President Trump were racist, bigoted, fascist cultists, few if any Democrats would say a word, much less protest, occupy, and otherwise try their best to disrupt our nation. Most of them would simply quietly cower and a few – again about 3% – would either be dead or incarcerated.

But no. President Trump is in no way a King and the American people aren’t fascist cultists of his. That and only that is why Democrat politicians feel safe to call him thus and goad their subordinates into political upheaval and violence. They live with great privilege, privilege no longer enjoyed even in the UK, and misuse it every chance they get.

Tags: America | Democrats | Fascists | Humor | Hypocrisy | Liberal Privilege | Liberals | Lies | No Kings | Politics | Privilege | Progressives | Protests | Society | Tyranny

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 21st, 2025 at 8:15 am and is filed under 2024 Elections, Humor, Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

“Al-Goebbels’ Di’aya” is merely an arabicization of “Goebbels’ Propaganda.” I find it highly fitting – and I love getting some continuing use out of the languages I had to learn 😉 – because the entirety of the “existence” of Palestine is a lie told so often that it became many’s truth. This despite the objective fact that “Palestine” and “Palestinians” are a myth and lie. The closest thing to that was “Syria Palaestina,” the name the Romans gave to the whole region after brutally putting down the Judean revolt in 136 AD.

Tags: Antisemitism | Goebbels | History | Israel | Judea | Lies | Palestine | Politics | Propaganda | Rome | Sarcasm | Society

This entry was posted on Friday, August 8th, 2025 at 4:30 pm and is filed under Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One of the most telling and evocative pieces of art I’ve seen in a while. It is the visual encapsulation of Hamas today. You can literally tell if one of Gazans is lying because simply by it speaking. And, you can tell it’s going to lie again simply because it’s still breathing.

Sadly for humanity, Gazanoccio seems to be disturbingly effective in these degenerate times. Between the Hamas members in our nation’s universities, the Anti-Semites across Europe and all of Africa, and those various entities across the globe who are more than happy to use Israel as a proxy war against America, it paints a bleak future for the world.

Tags: America | Anti-Semites | Antisemitism | Democrats | Gaza | Geopolitics | Hamas | Israel | Liars | Liberals | Lies | Politics | Progressives | Propaganda | Society | Terrorism | Terrorists | Vermin | War

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 at 9:39 am and is filed under Politics, Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Democrats love their Big Lies, mostly because their entire political platform is founded upon them and the supposed correction of them. But, for this post, I’m going to focus upon the Big Lie of “Banned Books.”

Simply put, barring a very, very few exceptions based upon the content being ruled as fraudulent (The Federal Mafia) or being classified material (Operation Dark Heart), there are no legally banned books in America and haven’t been since the 1971 SCOTUS decision in New York Times Co. v. United States. In point of legal fact, most previously banned books were made available for general publication after 1959, when the SCOTUS in Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. Regents overturned the Federal Anti-Obscenity Act (Comstock Act) of 1873.

No, almost the entire extent of “book banning” in the US is limited to concerned individuals wanting to protect children by keeping certain sorts of reading materials out of our schools. And, this is something that both Americans and Democrats have regularly engaged in for many decades and for fundamentally the same reason – protecting impressionable children from materials that they deem to be damaging to their psyches. It must be said though that Democrats are more likely to remove material from school libraries because of the author rather than the content than Americans are, e.g., many works by Dr. Seuss – even beyond the limited set of his works that could be – in a few cases, quite easily – considered to be “racially insensitive.”

And please, do not be like the Dems and their media and equate challenging a book with successfully banning it. Among both Americans and Democrats there always has been, are, and always will be a minority that challenges the publication and dissemination of various and sundry works. They fail and, even when they seem to succeed at the local level, our court system as quickly as the wheels of law allow reverses that success due to the 1st Amendment.

So, Book Bans are just another Democrat Big Lie.

A Couple Of Additional, Personal Points

I’m just going to add a few bits of my personal opinions on related points to the core of this post, mostly because I don’t feel like doing follow-up posts to cover these tangential specifics.

Ratings & Grade Scales

In my opinion, America needs to “rate” some of these books for age appropriate content. What I’m OK with in elementary school is far more limited than what I’m OK with in middle schools. And, when it comes to high schools, there’s very little in the way of reading materials that I believe should be restricted. Blanket restrictions across all grades, just like blanket approvals, don’t make a lick of sense to me.

Parental Approval

While I’m all for opt-outs and requiring parental approvals, I can’t see how this would be effectively applied to books in school libraries. If the books can be checked out by any kid, they’ll be passed around if their made “forbidden.” All requiring parental approval would do in my opinion is create “cool kids” who got to read these and pass them around for social credit or actual monetary / material profit. The Penthouse magazines that somebody – 😉 – passed around my high school being a possibly extreme example of this.

To Kill A Mockingbird – WTF!

Just as a quick WTF sidenote, Democrats seem to hate and have tried to remove Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mocking Bird from some of their school districts, but Americans have never seemed to have a problem with it.

You’d think, given the anti-American propaganda of the ever-so-woke Left, that it’d be either the other way around or with the Democrats also having no problem with it. Harper Lee’s Pulitzer Prize-winning 1960 novel does, after all, show stereotypical racism from Whites and fits near perfectly with the Democrats’ CRT curricula, since it showed what amounted to systemic racism and a lynch mob mentality. But no; they hate it because of problematical language and racial – that’d be towards Blacks – insensitivity.

Catcher In The Rye

I don’t believe that J. D. Salinger’s 1951 work, Catcher In The Rye should be banned from high schools. I do, however, think it should be removed from all required reading lists and school curricula. I would like to think that that book is despised by both Americans and Democrats as being harmful to minds of teenagers. In fact, I’m pretty sure that having to read and study it has tipped at least one at-risk teenager into serious depression.

Tags: America | Banned Books | Books | Democrats | Liberals | Lies | Politics | Progressives | Propaganda | Society

This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 4th, 2024 at 7:30 am and is filed under Books & Reading, Politics, Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.