Reflections From a Murky Pond

We, the People are finally getting a fairly large amount of credible and legally actionable evidence that Obama deliberately misused America’s intelligence community to thwart President Trump’s first election and to undermine him after he was elected. There are numerous calls for him and many others, including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, and former national security adviser Susan Rice, to be prosecuted for Treason and/or Sedition. But can former federal officials be prosecuted in the Russia-Trump collusion hoax? That is the question that arises from the recent actions of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.  

Dir. Gabbard has released declassified documents over what she describes as a “treasonous conspiracy” that was “directed by then President Obama” to provide “manufactured intelligence” that “Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected.” This was despite contradictory intelligence analyses that said the exact opposite: that “Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to ‘hack the United States election.’” 

What federal criminal statutes might cover what is alleged to have occurred? What could they legitimately under the law be charged with- and convicted of, without torturing the statute in a manner like Alvin Bragg did?

I can understand why Gabbard described it as a “treasonous conspiracy,” but the federal treason statute (18 U.S.C. § 2381) isn’t legitimately applicable. The misuse, even Obama’s gross misuse, of federal power to target a political opponent is heinous, but Treason, as a crime, can only be applied to someone who “levies war against” the country or “adheres to [its] enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere.” 

Similarly, Sedition statute (18 U.S.C. § 2384) can only properly be levied against “two or more persons” who “conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States … or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States.” As there was no force involved in what happened, the standard for Sedition charges hasn’t been met. 

So, the two most serious, most bandied about, and most emotionally satisfying charges, Treason and Sedition, have to be left off the table… if we, as a nation, are going to even pretend to respect the sanctity of the law. But, Obama and his cabal can still be charged in federal court.

These federal charges are quite applicable based on the evidence we have and prosecutorial precedent. Those charges are: Conspiracy to Defraud the United States(18 U.S.C. § 371); 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding); Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)); Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241). 

And, in a case of exquisitely delicious irony, these are the same charges that Biden’s hitman, Jack Smith filed against President Trump. 😆 👿

Oh yeah! And there’s this problem with the Treason charge as well. 😉

Tags: America | Crime | Deep State | Democrats | Federal Law | Law | Obama | Politics | Russian Collusion | Sedition | Treason

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 5th, 2025 at 6:15 am and is filed under Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

This is an apt, sarcastic representation of what is actually happening. Anyone and everyone questioned about Biden’s mental state while in office and/or the usage of the autopen during his installation in the White House has repeatedly pleaded the Fifth.

Well, that’s the strongest evidence possible that it wasn’t Biden, but other people and/or organizations – who knows which were foreign and which were domestic – were running the shitshow that was the Biden Regime.

Tags: America | Autopen | Biden | Democrats | Fifth Amendment | Law | Liberals | Politics | Treason | Usurpation

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2025 at 10:26 am and is filed under 2020 Elections, Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Democrats are all up in arms over criminal illegals being deported without “Due Process.” However, it’s quite easily arguable under jurisprudence that no illegal alien is due Due Process when and if the “punishment” is deportation. Deportation is neither, legally speaking, a civil nor a criminal punishment. It is simply removing them from where they’re not entitled to be and returning them to the proper place.

No Punishment, No Due Process

Under 8 U.S. Code § 1325, these invaders could be fined up to $250 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined up to $500, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. Both the fines and imprisonment, however, are provided for under Title 18, which is the overarching Crimes and Criminal Procedures statute in US law. That would invoke the constitutional requirement for Due Process. However, simple deportation is arguably an “intervention” that precludes Title 18 completely and, therefore, is not subject to Due Process, it not legally being a civil or criminal proceeding.

So yes! Illegal Aliens should be given the process they’re actually due and not one jot or iota more. 😉

Tags: America | Democrats | Deportation | Due Process | Illegal Aliens | Illegal Immigrants | Illegal Immigration | Illegals | Invaders | Judicial Activism | Judicial Insurrection | Judicial Misconduct | Law | Politics

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 23rd, 2025 at 12:16 pm and is filed under Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

At a bare, barren minimum, every single foreigner within our borders who actively supports Hamas should be rounded up and deported. And yes, if we could arrange it, they should be deported to Gaza so that they can die there. As for any titular US citizens who are doing the same, they should be arrested under Title 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason, because they have and are most certainly meet the legal standard of “adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States.”

And yes, Ladies, Gentlemen, and Democrats, I absolutely and wholeheartedly believe that the DOJ should perfectly make it clear when they do so that they’re seeking the death penalty for these vermin’s crimes.

Oh! And no, Ladies, Gentlemen, and Democrats, this would not in any way, shape, or fashion violate these filth’s 1st Amendment right right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Even if one ignores in the vermin’s favor the legal definition of peaceably, the 1st Amendment is not 100% absolute. A perfect and very pointed example being the German American Bund in the 1930s and 1940s. At first, when the US was not a declared enemy of the Third Reich, the Bund was allowed and even protected from reprisals by American citizens. However, at the end of 1941 when America official joined World War II, the government utterly shut them down, arrested their leaders, and even dissolved the US citizenship of their primary leader, Fritz Kuhn and deported him to Germany.

So please, from the city to the plaza, deport these filth to Gaza or consign their remains to landfills.

Tags: America | Anti-Semites | Antisemitism | Democrats | Gaza | Hamas | Law | Liberals | Politics | Progressives | Protests | Society | Terrorism | Treason

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 28th, 2024 at 7:38 am and is filed under Politics, Society. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

The report is in and published. Special Counsel, Robert Hur – who happens NOT to be White – has determined that Joe Biden did in fact willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen, and that these classified materials included: marked classified documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan, and notebooks containing Mr. Biden’s handwritten entries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitive intelligence sources and methods.

Special Counsel Hur also concluded that, despite this, Biden should not be charged with any crime or wrongdoing, partially due to the DOJ’s longstanding rule against prosecuting a sitting President, and partially due to Biden being “innocent” due to mental disease or defect.

We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him-by then a former president well into his eighties-of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.

We conclude the evidence is not sufficient to convict, and we decline to recommend prosecution of Mr. Biden for his retention of the classified Afghanistan documents.

— Robert K. Hur, Special Counsel

In a nutshell, Mr. Hur’s report and recommendation to his boss, AG Merrick Garland, that, irrespective of any longstanding proscription against prosecuting a sitting POTUS and a similar – only once violated… by Garland – longstanding precedent of not prosecuting a former President or Vice President for mishandling classified documents from his own administration, there’s no point of bringing charges against Biden because a jury is likely to acquit him on the grounds of his failing mental state.

My Take On This Farce

One, there was no legal or law enforcement point in this investigation in the first place. If The DOJ, by it’s own rules, can’t prosecute a POTUS and precedent has, with one politically motivated exception, always been to simply recover the mishandled materials from former POTUS’s and not charge them, the only reason for the report was to create a more palatable reason for doing exactly nothing. And that is exactly what Hur did; he stated the case that Biden wouldn’t be convicted by jury due to reasonable doubt of his mental ability to willfully violate the statute. That lets Garland and the DOJ “off the hook” for not indicting Biden.

Tags: 2024 Elections | America | Biden | Classified Documents | Crime | Dementia | Democrats | Insanity | Law | Politics | Robert Hur

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 11th, 2024 at 12:02 pm and is filed under 2024 Elections, Politics. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.