Wikileaks LogoThat Was Then

America’s domestic enemies, the Liberals and Progressives, have to-date been quite enamored of- and staunchly supportive of Julian Assange’s anarcho-terrorist organization, Wikileaks. They’ve heralded Wikileaks as soldiers in the war against America and her allies and lent whatever material and emotion aid and comfort to Assange and his cronies that they could.

This Is Now

But now that Wikileaks has turned traitor, as it were, to the Liberals’ and Progressives’ cause and published data that indicates the Democrats committed election fraud in order to get their boy, Obama elected, can we expect this to change and for Wikileaks to be a valid target in their eyes?

Wikileaks recently published stolen internal email from the private intelligence and analysis firm, Stratfor which indicate that Black Democrats in Philadelphia, PA and various locations in Ohio did, in fact commit election in the 2008 presidential elections and that Senator McCain knew about it but refused to press charges or go public with the data for the good of the nation.

The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”.

Making public such accusations without deriding editorials, especially when they involve Philadelphia and Ohio where voting “irregularities” were complain of and ignored by the Obama Regime, is a direct violation of current Liberal and Progressive orthodoxy. Will the Left remain silent on such heresy?

Worse perhaps, Wikileaks disseminated the documents without sanitizing them. Those documents hit the public while still pinpointing Blacks as the criminal element having committed election fraud in order to “elect” their First Black President. According to the Leftists’ dogma that’s racist. Will the Liberals and Progressives still support such a racist organization as Wikileaks?

In the wake of Wikileaks’ turning against Obama by publishing evidence of his being “elected” through the criminal activities of Black Democrats will the Liberals and Progressives continue to support and lend aid and comfort to this anarcho-terrorist organization?

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Charges Facing Manning

Bradley Manning - Queer, Traitor, DoomedUS Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is facing serious charges because of his traitorous release of large amounts of classified material. He he is charged with three (3) separate crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The most serious of these crimes is breaching Article 104 – Aiding The Enemy, which is a capital offense.

He is also charged under Article 92 – Failure to Obey Order or Regulation and Article 134 – General Article. The latter is a catch-all for improper behavior by military personnel that isn’t specifically covered by other Articles under UCMJ.

In all, with the original charges and the recent additional charges, Manning is facing 34 Specifications – very close to what are called “counts” in the civilian courts – between the three (3) charges.

  1. Article 104 – Aiding The Enemy (1 Specification)
  2. Article 92 – Failure to Obey Order or Regulation (9 Specifications)
  3. Article 134 – General Article (24 Specifications)

Article 104 carries the death penalty or any other legal punishment that the court-martial or military commission decrees. Both Articles 92 and 134 allow for any legal punishment short of execution that the court-martial or military commission decrees.

It is reported that the prosecution will not seek the death penalty under Article 104, seeking life imprisonment instead. Under UCMJ however, the convening authority, not the prosecution, has the final decision as to whether or not to impose the death penalty. This combined with the broad latitude in sentencing allowed to the court-martial or military commission which will hear the case makes it anyone’s guess what will happen.

My guess it that about 10 of the specifications under Articles 92 and 134 will be dropped due to redundancy and lack of evidence and that, at the end of the day, Manning will be sentenced to a Bad Conduct Discharge and Incarceration for Life + 69 years (3 years / specification).

Tags: | | | | | |

An Odd Ambivalence

Julian Assange - Enemy of America and the West. He needs to be killed by one of humanity's governments!Current events and the odd the ways that reality messes with people in general has left me with an odd feeling – Ambivalence, which is quite odd for me.

I’m truly torn over the moral and ethical implications of my involvement, such as it is, in the whole Julian Assange and WikiLeaks debacle.

On one hand, I put up a post that included content that upset and outraged a number of Australians enough that they were willing to violate their own laws to threaten me and my family with death. That, in and of itself, showed me that my post was egregiously wrong and I chose – No, my provider only required that I remove certain specific content – to delete it.

On the other hand, my actions seems to have convinced an avowed enemy of America and fugitive from the international judicial – note, I don’t say justice – system to surrender himself into UK custody. For support of that very odd and unexpected turn of events I refer you Julian Assange’s own words which were published as Op-Ed in The Australian just before he surrender himself to British authorities.

[Sic]…There have been dozens of serious calls in the US for me to be “taken out” by US special forces. Sarah Palin says I should be “hunted down like Osama bin Laden”, a Republican bill sits before the US Senate seeking to have me declared a “transnational threat” and disposed of accordingly. An adviser to the Canadian Prime Minister’s office has called on national television for me to be assassinated. An American blogger has called for my 20-year-old son, here in Australia, to be kidnapped and harmed for no other reason than to get at me.

I am that American blogger that Julian Assange referenced just before he submitted himself to the legal system. That infers or alludes that I was was part of the reason why he did so.

Hence, the ambivalence I feel, in the true and denotative sense of the word.


Pronunciation: \am-biv-uh-luhns\
Function: Noun
Date: 1909


  1. Simultaneous and contradictory attitudes or feelings (as attraction and repulsion) toward an object, person, or action
  2. Continual fluctuation (as between one thing and its opposite)

I did something that, even by my attenuated standards of Right and Wrong, was reprehensible and it seems to have had a net positive impact, especially for the citizens of America and the Western World.

This leaves me in an odd position and one that I was, and am, frankly unprepared to deal with. I truly never expected – hoped, certainly – my lone voice in the wilderness of the internet to have any measurable on the world at large.

Truly, I’m going to have think about this – and assess and reassess how much of this is ego on my part – for a while. This will likely affect the frequency on content of this my posts for a while. 🙁

Tags: | | | | | |