Our Educated Enemies

Our Educated Enemies Proudly Displaying Their Hate For Us
Our Educated Enemies

The womyn over at HuffPo are gushing over the continuance of the trend for Latina college graduates to decorate themselves and the caps with Hispanic-centric ornaments and messages. This is not surprising since the sorts that run HuffPo almost always side with America’s enemies, both foreign and domestic, and probably prefer America to have educated enemies – educated at our colleges and universities, often on our dime – within our borders where they can do us the most harm.

That being said, don’t make the mistake of believing that I am utterly against the trend of #latinxgradcaps or think of the Latinas engaging in this behavior as being monolithic. Many, as can be seen from the photos on HuffPo, are innocuous and objectively non-offensive. Some, however, are quite anti-American and HuffPo not only makes no distinction, they showcase them.

Imagine, if you will, what the response would have been to a Non-Hispanic White draping themselves in the American flag at a graduation ceremony. It’s beyond doubtful that they’d be allowed to participate in the ceremony. Yet, not only are these Latinas allowed to do so while draped in the colors of foreign nations, they’re celebrated for doing so.

Be sure of this: These Latinas are our nations enemies, They’re within our borders and proudly proclaiming their loyalties to foreign powers. And they’re now educated enemies with the added advantage of Affirmative Action and a plethora of non-profit lawfare organizations, e.g., the ACLU, to aid them in their endeavors against us.

Related Reading:

Experience And Education
All Enemies Foreign and Domestic (Kelly Blake series Book 4)
Patterns for College Writing with 2016 MLA Update
College Algebra (12th Edition)
An Illegal Immigrant (Helping Hands Book 6)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Pelosi’s Citizenship Test

As a prophylactic and/or preemptive caveat, this is Nance Pelosi I’m writing out, so normative standards of cognizance, sanity, truthfulness, and allegiance something close to useless to either expect of apply. Still, as so many of our domestic enemies both support her and believe as she does, this bears notice. This is doubly true today as Pelosi’s citizenship test and the metric thereof are core to our current crisis.

Pelosi’s response to Laura Wilkerson, whose 18 year-old son in 2010 was beaten, tortured, killed, and his corpse burned by an illegal immigrant, Hermilio Moralez, would beggar credulity if it weren’t so indicative how the White majority of our domestic enemies think and believe.

I can’t even imagine the pain. I can’t even imagine. There is, there is nothing, I’m sure that can compare to the grief that you have. And so I pray for you. I pray for you. Again, we all pray that none of us has to experience what you have experienced. So thank you for channeling your energy to help prevent something like that from happening. But I do want to say to you, that in our sanctuary cities, our people are not disobeying the law.

These are law-abiding citizens, it enables them to, to be there without being reported to ICE in case of another crime that they might bear witness to.

— Nancy Pelosi

By Pelosi’s standards illegal aliens are law-abiding citizens. Please ignore the objective reality that they are inherently not law-abiding and aren’t citizens. The metrics of Pelosi’s test for legality and citizenship seem to be based solely upon her opinion and the opinions of those who support her continued employment and access to Americans’ taxdollars.

Then, in some sense, this is to be expected from things like Pelosi and those that support her. They hate the existence of nations – if those nations are made up of people of European (read as White) descent, especially America. Hence, they have the strongly held belief that any legal standard beyond residency – by any means – for citizenship is inherently wrong – if the subject in question isn’t of European (read as White) descent.

Related Reading:

Know Your Power: A Message to America's Daughters
Imperfect Creatures: Vermin, Literature, and the Sciences of Life, 1600-1740
Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction
America: A Narrative History (Brief Tenth Edition)  (Vol. 2)
La Latina

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

You Will Rent The Apt

If Americans though it was horrific that your business and life could be destroyed for not baking a cake or not printing a tee-shirt that one found offensive was bad, they really need to see where this sort of thing is going and what the Obama Regime is doing.

Forget cakes and tee-shirts for queers. The Obama Regime is demanding that landlords rent the apartment to criminals if those criminals are non-White, especially Black.

Across the United States, African Americans and Hispanics are arrested, convicted and incarcerated at rates disproportionate to their share of the general population. Consequently, criminal records-based barriers to housing are likely to have a disproportionate impact on minority home seekers. While having a criminal record is not a protected characteristic under the Fair Housing Act, criminal history-based restrictions on housing opportunities violate the Act if, without justification, their burden falls more often on renters or other housing market participants of one race or national origin over another (i.e., discriminatory effects liability).

~*~

A housing provider violates the Fair Housing Act when the provider’s policy or practice has an unjustified discriminatory effect, even when the provider had no intent to discriminate. Under this standard, a facially – neutral policy or practice that has a discriminatory effect violates the Act if it is not supported by a legally sufficient justification. Thus, where a policy or practice that restricts access to housing on the basis of criminal history has a disparate impact on individuals of a particular race, national origin, or other protected class, such policy or practice is unlawful under the Fair Housing Act if it is not necessary to serve a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest of the housing provider, or if such interest could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.

Office of General Counsel, HUD

And of course, if the non-White criminal files a discrimination complaint, the landlord or “property provider” is the one who must shoulder the burden and expense of proving that they had a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest in not renting property the non-White criminal, that such interest was neither hypothetical nor speculative, that not renting the property to the non-White criminal in question would achieve that interest, and that not renting the property to the non-White criminal was the only way to achieve that interest.

Yes, in this case as it is in every single case involving “disparate impact,” “discriminatory effect,” and “protected classes” there is a presumption of guilt upon the presumably White defendant – guilty until proven innocent. This is because the accused, if White, is considered guilty not due to his or her actions and motives but because the complainant is non-White and the effect upon the complainant is negative.

To further degrade any hope for true, unbiased justice in these matters, consider the qualifications needed for the landlord’s interests – substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory, and neither hypothetical nor speculative. All of these are completely and utterly subjective. These are metrics decided upon solely so that the government is the final arbiter of what any case’s results will be.

Cracka, you will rent the apartment to that Black or Hispanic thug or you will be destroyed.

Related Reading:

The Law
[(The Protected Class: Real Life Stories of Women Over the Age of 40 Who Have Experienced Discrimination or Harassment in the Workplace * * )] [Author: Kathleen M Hargiss] [Sep-2002]
The New Minority: White Working Class Politics in an Age of Immigration and Inequality
Property, 8th Edition
Panda Stickers (Dover Stickers)

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |