An End To Islamists

CAIR - Raghead terrorist organization in AmericsThe Muslim Brotherhood’s primary US cell, CAIR wants an end to “Islamists” – not the actual Islamists, mind you, just the use of that word by anyone, especially the press. Their ranting and raving mouthpiece, Ibrahim Hooper made it clear they CAIR wants “Islamist” banned in public discourse because there are rarely any positive references to Islamist in news articles”.

Firstly, the only thing involving this Muslim vermin, Ibrahim Hooper that should ever be in the news is the joyous announcement of it’s extermination. But, since I haven’t gotten to him, and others who have more opportunity seem too weak to do what is right, we’re forced to hear or read this incestuous pig-fucker’s jabberings.

As many people make promises to themselves to improve their lives or their societies in the coming year, here is a suggested New Year’s resolution for media outlets in America and worldwide: Drop the term “Islamist.”

The Associated Press (AP) added the term to its influential Stylebook in 2012. That entry reads: “Islamist — Supporter of government in accord with the laws of Islam. Those who view the Quran as a political model encompass a wide range of Muslims, from mainstream politicians to militants known as jihadi.”

The AP says it sought input from Arabic-speaking experts and hoped to provide a neutral perspective by emphasizing the “wide range” of religious views encompassed in the term.

Many Muslims who wish to serve the public good are influenced by the principles of their faith. Islam teaches Muslims to work for the welfare of humanity and to be honest and just. If this inspiration came from the Bible, such a person might well be called a Good Samaritan. But when the source is the Quran, the person is an “Islamist.”

Unfortunately, the term “Islamist” has become shorthand for “Muslims we don’t like.” It is currently used in an almost exclusively pejorative context and is often coupled with the term “extremist,” giving it an even more negative slant.

There are few, if any, positive references to “Islamist” in news articles.

I would hope this little rant of Hoopers would sound familiar to the peoples of the Civilized World as it is nothing but yet another paraphrasing of the IOC’s ongoing attempt to make criticizing Islam a crime. I would also hope that this is a case where familiarity breeds contempt, loathing, and swift reprisal against both the speaker and those it claims to speak for.

For those who think my response to a “simple request” seems extreme, let me remind that CAIR rarely just asks for anything. Any “request” by them must be, given their history of paper terrorism against people who criticize Islam for its subhuman evil, seen as nothing less than a legal preamble or preparatory step for lawfare.

~*~

I will remind each and every American that warfare trumps lawfare; attorneys who take cases against Americans’ rights are valid targets; and that neither legal briefs nor judge’s robes will stop a well-aimed bullet.

Related Reading:

Free Speech in an Open Society
The Great and Holy War: How World War I Became a Religious Crusade
The Terrorists: A Martin Beck Police Mystery (10) (Vintage Crime/Black Lizard)
The Islamist: Why I Became an Islamic Fundamentalist, What I Saw Inside, and Why I Left
The Islamist

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

8 Responses to “An End To Islamists”

  1. ceefour Says:

    Little by little They have inserted Their influence into our lives…in the US and in the world; They either use deadly force or they use propaganda. It is possible we haven’t seen the Saturday bombs going off in the malls, yet, because They know that sort of action would be counter productive and the American reaction may not be pleasant. On the other hand, if America was disarmed….different game plan. STAY ALERT!!!

  2. jonolan Says:

    How would more terrorism be counterproductive for them? Every time they use it, they instantly start propaganda and legal campaigns that claim that THEY’RE the ones being victimized because humanity rightly distrusts them. That’s what CAIR does as their primary task for the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Look at all the crap they pulled after 9/11. The first blow was bloody terrorism but the follow-up blows were all lawfare in the US.

    Of course, the solution is that whenever they choose to fight in the courtroom, American should take the fight to their streets, shops, homes, and their crotch-droppings’ schools.

    Let THEIR filthy bitches scream and weep over their dead spawn for a while, then gut shoot them and rape the wound in front of their males before finally exterminating them too.

  3. Ceefour Says:

    I try to avoid hasty generalization with These People (just like the BLKS) cause I feel that there may be Good Islamists but, then again, when I spot one in a mall a little alarm goes off and I wonder if This Person is, has, or is about to plant something bad. AT least They don’t play that “drop the honky” game…yet.

  4. jonolan Says:

    I can’t see how, in the West, there could ever be a “Good Islamist.” Their beliefs, world-view, and each and every part of their behavior is both inimical and antithetical to the Civilized World. Simply put, they don’t belong here and never will, at least not as freemen and we no longer practice slavery.

    …And it’s no crime nor sin to be alert and cautious whenever one sees a Muslim. While most have no more courage or desperation than anyone else, hence not being a threat, some do and they look just like the others.

  5. Ceefour Says:

    And that’s whats scary. Their “bible” tells em that it is perfectly ok to destroy the infidel…it is required if they are good “islamists.” If they don’t destroy the infidel they are “bad islamists” and they, themselves, can be destroyed. If we have our guns we have a chance…no guns..NO CHANCE

  6. jonolan Says:

    That’s scary, certainly. But what’s really scary is the sad fact that we’ll have to use our weapons against the useful idiots in our own society, many in positions of authority, who’d side with them.

  7. Ruthie Rosa Says:

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations has affinities to extremists of both the left and right, sharing features with both. Its extensive ties to far-left groups include funding from the Tides Foundation for its “Interfaith Coalition against Hate Crimes”; [65] endorsing a statement issued by Refuse & Resist [66] and a ” National Day of Protest to Stop Police Brutality, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation.” [67] CAIR supported the ” Civil Liberties Restoration Act ,” legislation drafted by Open Society Policy Center , an organization founded by George Soros that would obstruct U.S. law enforcement from prosecuting the “War on Extremism.” Far-left members of Congress such as Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) and Jim McDermott (Democrat, Washington) have turned up as featured speakers at CAIR fundraising events.

  8. jonolan Says:

    Ruthie,

    Until the reach supremacy, cells like CAIR will ally themselves, at least superficially, with any group that furthers the war against America. This is especially true when it concerns any other group that will help them in their lawfare while protecting them from armed retaliation by the American people.

    As always, if they bring a lawyer, Americans should bring a sniper. If they file a suit, Americans should plant a bomb.

Leave a Reply