It’s Not Her Tits (NSFW)

Carrie Prejean sort of semi-nudeCarrie Prejean, currently Miss California, may have her title stripped from her by the Miss USA pageant administration. She may also lose her position as first runner-up in the 2009 Miss USA pageant, which was held April 19. Both decisions may well be announced tomorrow (Monday, May 10, 2009).

If she is stripped of the title and position that she earned it won’t be because of the semi-nude photos of her that were released by those who are unfriendly towards her – though those photos will undoubtedly be used as the excuse and/or justification for her punishment.

Miss Prejean won’t lose her title over the fact that there are photos in which her tits – which the Miss USA pageant bought for her – weren’t covered by fabric. If she is stripped of her Miss California title, it’ll be be because she wouldn’t say that she supported Gay Marriage.

Voicing beliefs that don’t match the queers’ agenda is grounds for insult and now punishment.

If having had nude or semi-nude photos of ones’ self in existance were a problem for contestants in the Miss USA pageant, then Miss Rhode Island, Alysha Castonguay, would have been censured as well. While serving as a New England Patriots Cheerleader she posed semi-nude for Maxim magazine. The Miss USA pageant coordinators had no problems with these photos.

No, it won’t be Carrie Prejean’s unclothed breasts that cost her the Miss California title and that of first runner-up in the 2009 Miss USA pageant. It’ll be because she had the temerity to say when asked that she believed that marriage is between a man and woman as her Christian faith directs her to do.

~*~

NOTE: The Miss USA pageant does have perfectly legal grounds under their contract with Ms. Prejean to strip her of her titles. She did in fact violate her contract with them by not telling them of the semi-nude photos existence. Ms. Castonguay is said to have been upfront about the fact that she had been in at least one semi-nude photoset.

Of course Alysha Castonguay’s semi-nude photos were published in Maxim magazine for all the world to see, whereas Ms. Prejean’s semi-nude photos were made when she was beginning her modeling career at 17 and were merely part of her portfolio which would be sent to various agencies and clients.

But every thinking American knows that the only reason that she’s being persecuted is because she refused to set aside her faith for the sake of the queers’ agenda and the anti-American atrocity of political correctness.

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

4 Responses to “It’s Not Her Tits (NSFW)”

  1. Personal Failure Says:

    Of course, it could also be that rather than fulfilling her duties as Miss California, she wandered off with NOM to do work that directly violates her contract.

    Oh, and “lose”. “loose” would refer to something not being tight. We certainly can’t accuse Ms. Prejean of that.

  2. jonolan Says:

    Technically, any public appearance Ms. Prejean made without the express written permission of the pageant committee would have “directly violated’ her contract, but we both know that the only reason this is a problem now is that the appearances she made weren’t pro-queer marriage.

    That’s just sickening. American institutions should not be bending over for the queers’ agenda, and they certainly shouldn’t be punishing anyone who stands up for their own beliefs.

    BTW: Thanks for the spelling correction; that particular mistake often slips by me when I’m proofreading my posts prior to publishing them.

  3. snaggletoothie Says:

    The Jawa Report had a good observation about all this rabidly hateful PC BS: “Perez Hilton Has Convinced Me……that it’s just wrong to try to hold a moderate position on homosexual issues.

    “The continued vicious persecution of Miss USA contestant Carrie Prejean clearly demonstrates that most gay men are too mentally unstable and utterly self-absorbed to function in society.” at http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/197562.php

    I think the only question is how representative of the gay community as a whole are the screamers.

  4. jonolan Says:

    The “screamers” are and are not representative of the bulk of the queers from what I can tell, snaggletoothie. Most queers that I know aren’t that vicious and in-your-face about things, but most seem to hold a similar position to that of the “screamers” on the issues.

    One good thing though – Donald trump decided not to bow to the queers’ agenda and to political correctness. Ms. Prejean is still Miss California. 🙂

Leave a Reply