Presentation Matters

Presentation matters, often more than the substance or performance. This is especially true in politics and in sociopolitical issues. This, in current times, is never more obvious than in respect to the gun-grabbing Liberals’ criteria for what firearms they would initial forbid American citizens from owning as the bulk of those criteria are purely cosmetic and have nothing to do with the functional capabilities of the weapons in question.

To make this point so clear that even Liberals and Progressive can understand it – though they’ll reject it and publicly deny the understanding – let us apply the same sort of cosmetic criteria to something other than various classes and pseudo-classes of firearms.

Negro v. Assault Negro
Presentation Matters – Negro vs. Assault Negro

It’s obvious to all that Americans do not need Assault Negroes in their midst due to the inherent threat that they pose, a threat proven by decades and decades of statistics. Indeed, as the Constitution is not written in stone and our Founding Father’s certainly never intended or considered that America would be filled with Assault Negroes, it is completely right and proper to place reasonable restrictions upon the exercise of the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution and ban Assault Negroes.

Related Reading:

We Had Sneakers, They Had Guns: The Kids Who Fought for Civil Rights in Mississippi
Animal 3: Revelations (N/A)
California Gun Laws
Shooter's Bible Guide to Firearms Assembly, Disassembly, and Cleaning
A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870-1920

Tags: | | | | | | | | | |

Leave a Reply