Droning Hypocrisy

Obama HypocriteThe arrogance and abject hypocrisy of the Obama Regime knows no bounds, not even those of basic decorum and intelligence. They can’t even manage to be marginally circumspect in the behavior.

With the run-up to the 2012 elections indicating that there was a decent chance that Mitt Romney would be elected and, hence, the Obama Regime would no longer have control over US drone warfare operations, they accelerated their efforts to make rules governing drone strikes to use against Romney.

Of course, once Obama was reelected, these efforts were once again put on the back burner so as not to hamper their own activities.

“There was concern that the levers might no longer be in our hands,” said one official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

But then this is par for the course for Obama, his handlers and overseers, and his sycophants and cultists. Laws are for other people – Americans – not for them. So too is it par for the course that their priorities were to prepare for the use of lawfare against Romney in the event of his election instead of codifying rules of engagement for drone strikes.

Maybe Obama was just worried about being on the receiving end of drone strike. Face facts, he’s a clearer and less ambiguous enemy target than Anwar al-Awlaki ever was.

Their droning hypocrisy is nauseating. I know that it’s ridiculous to expect any better from Obama and his sort, but I do expect those who are in charge of my nation’s national defense and foreign policy to show a certain modicum of discretion and circumspection when they’re engaged in unsavory activities.

Related Reading:

Mitt Romney in His Own Words
Mitt Romney and the Mormon Church: Questions
America: A Narrative History (Brief Ninth Edition)  (Vol. 1)
Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas
Lawfare: The War Against Free Speech: A First Amendment Guide for Reporting in an Age of Islamist Lawfare

Tags: | | | | | | | | |

5 Responses to “Droning Hypocrisy”

  1. cmblake6 Says:

    This MMMPOS has exploited the supposed aspects of Christianity with malice aforethought. It’s entire purpose is, and has been, the destruction of this nation. It must go. Further, it needs to be hauled out either in cuffs, or feet first. Don’t care which.

  2. cmblake6 Says:

    But then this is par for the course for Obama, his handlers and overseers, and his sycophants and cultists. Laws are for other people – Americans – not for them. So too is it par for the course that their priorities were to prepare for the use of lawfare against Romney in the event of his election instead of codifying rules of engagement for drone strikes.

    Exceedingly precise. All that needs to be said.

  3. jonolan Says:

    I can’t really agree that Obama’s purpose is, and has been, the destruction of this nation. Insofar as I can see his only purpose is his own aggrandizement. I don’t think the boy has an agenda that stretches past his reflection in the nearest mirror.

    The same, of course, cannot be said by those who are running him. They’re purpose is, and has been, the destruction of this nation so that they can rebuild it as the geographic region they always wanted it to be.

    Fortunately, we Americans are, by and large, and armed people and, when not if, they go too far we’ll be able to exterminate them and their misborn crotch-droppings unto the last squalling infant.

  4. Alan Scott Says:

    The hypocrisy of President Obama is self-evident. Since he does not care what we ordinary peons think I like to point out the hypocrisy of his supporters. Bush was held responsible for the misdeeds of the lowest ranking soldiers in Iraq. Obama is not held responsible for the incompetence and cover up at Benghazi. Bush was held responsible for the financial meltdown even though he had nothing to do with mortgages for bad credit risks. President Obama gets a pass for 4 years of 8,9,10 % unemployment and $5 Trillion in new debt.

    We are called racists and hate mongers for daring to attack the man who would stop the sea levels from rising, yet for 8 years their hatred of Bush bordered on the psychotic.

    For some reason Obamaites are ultra sensitive when you dare show them their own hypocrisy when supporting their hero.

  5. jonolan Says:

    When dealing with the beliefs and opinions of the Left and their minority sharecroppers about President Bush Jr. and Obama it’s important to remember two things:

    1. President Bush Jr. was White
    2. Obama decided that he was Black

    That’s the difference or, at least, the only difference that matters to our domestic enemies. They will never hold Obama accountable for anything solely because he’s a Black and, in their worldview, Blacks can never be held accountable for anything except running off the plantation and assimilating at long last into America.

Leave a Reply